Image 01

Posts Tagged ‘conservatives’

Nerve Plucks

Monday, October 5th, 2009

Mellow on Mon­day I am, so much so that it’s now Tues­day. No duti­ful dysphe­mis­tic metaphors today, merely a con­ge­ries of nerve pluc­kers. Unlike nerve twitchers, which con­ti­nue their spas­mo­dic mean­de­ring through the psyche for some time, making them a sig­ni­fi­cant and serious anno­yance, a nerve pluc­ker is merely an exter­nal itch. Once scratched, easily forgotten.

John made note of this new WAPO con­test last week. Today, having recei­ved the email all subsc­ri­bers get, remin­ding me that I could be America’s Next Pun­dit , I sighed. I asked why, to no one in par­ti­cu­lar, as I was alone in a Panera Bread in Chevy Chase, suc­king up free wire­less while wai­ting for a friend. I sus­pec­ted the gent­le­man sit­ting at the next table in his Brooks Brothers suit, loo­king shee­pishly from side to side as he typed, was ans­we­ring WAPO’s plea. I hope for his sake he was appl­ying for a job at some con­ser­va­tive think tank.

We need more pun­dits? WAPO is replete with them. Are they not willing to pay real jour­na­list any lon­ger, or is it that Ame­ri­cans don’t want real news? Don’t know what real news is? Is this a des­pe­rate attempt to get rea­ders? And more than this, would anyone with an opi­nion of worth — bac­ked with expe­rience and wor­king know­ledge of any given sub­ject — want to give that opi­nion for $200 per column? I don’t think so.

“Blog­ger Payola” news. (source, FTC Votes to End “Blog­ger Payola). I just love that term don’t you?

Stem­ming from the unin­ten­tio­nal shoddy ethics of what some call “Mommy Blog­gers” who pre­tend to use and love pro­ducts in order to receive free pro­ducts, or for a paycheck, there are some new rules being ins­ti­tu­ted in Decem­ber by the one and only FTC. The full pdf offe­red at the CJR site is avai­la­ble here. Some blog­gers com­plai­ned they couldn’t trust their long time reads any lon­ger. So now it’s about transparency.

I resign myself to trans­pa­rency, and pro­mise that when I tell you to read a post by Blog­ger A or Blog­ger B it’s because the post is worthy and the blog­ger is prime. It will never be because they pay me. How do I know this? Because I’ve asked them to pay me. They said no.

Not a nerve pluck, but a recom­men­da­tion. From the Washing­ton Post, believe it or not. An Op-Ed by Ste­ven F. Hay­ward, a bit of an expert in con­ser­va­tism, and not one of my favo­rite peo­ple, but still a worthy read. He asks, Is Con­ser­va­tism Brain-Dead?

A worthwhile read, even if you already know the ans­wer, and most of you do of course, know the answer.

I want to pass on good thoughts to someone I’ve never met. I’ve read about him often enough over the last 4 years, at Pia Sava­ges Cour­ting Des­tiny. She calls him Rafe, though I know not his real name. He is part of her life, and part of her wri­ting, and for that I thank him. Con­se­quently I have a bit of an attach­ment to his cha­rac­ter, if not the real life entity.

Rafe suf­fe­red a rup­tu­red cere­bral aneurysm while lif­ting a tread­mill and has under­gone sur­gi­cal correc­tion, eva­cua­tion of the blood, and repair of the aneurysm. He is thus far doing well, but it is touch and go. My vibes are out there, so feel free to send your vibes along to Rafe. We are all cha­rac­ters in someone’s story, and we may all need someone’s thoughts some day.

peace