cooper culture
Image 01

Yanking My Chain This Week

September 29th, 2009 by cooper

Not even a public option here, des­pite from 2000 to 2007, pro­fits at the 10 lar­gest publicly-traded health insu­rance com­pa­nies went up 428 per­cent. CEOs at these com­pa­nies made an ave­rage of $11.9 million in 2007. In the past nine years, health insu­rance pre­miums have more than dou­bled — a rate three times fas­ter than wage inc­rea­ses. Health care firms boos­ted their lobb­ying efforts in the second quar­ter of this year by $133 million, beco­ming the lar­gest industry spen­der on lobb­ying. And Karen Ignagni, the chief lobb­yist for the health insu­rance trade asso­cia­tion, made $1.65 million in 2007. (MoJo The Democ­rats’ Split Per­so­na­lity Disor­der)

Click to Enlarge.
Untitled-1

Reform without a public option can still remedy a lot of these ills, as long as there’s enough regu­la­tion. But it’s not clear there will be, which is why Roc­ke­fe­ller is spea­king out – and why he should be.

What Roc­ke­fe­ller Unders­tands Joh­nathan Cohn.

Bad Con­gress­men. They are like dogs. If you feed them, and obviously the insu­rance industry is fee­ding them, they obey. The insu­rance industry big shots are sit­ting down to their — not on the healthy diet list, French chef ser­ved — din­ners this eve­ning, sighing with relief, and doing a imper­ti­nent yet mali­cious fist bump. “We did it again, phew that was close, a bottle of 1945 Cha­teau Mouton-Rothschild Jero­boam, if you please waiter”.

Adden­dum: I found this blog saying something which may end up true. Sho­wing that the insu­rance com­pa­nies are the only ones laughing this quote says it all.

I actually think we are going to get a reform that is both worse than the sta­tus quo and worse than a pure sin­gle payer system.

Kudos to our Congress!

As I unders­tand it, insu­rance com­pa­nies will not be able to refuse to cover some one, nor will they be able to charge high risk peo­ple a pre­mium that reflects their risk. The price won’t be uni­form, but the maxi­mum varia­tion will be well below what it would take to correctly price the varia­tion in risks.

As I noted before, this will make pre­miums for healthy peo­ple extra high. And as the WSJ poin­ted out yes­ter­day, at least on the mar­gin, it will make healthy peo­ple want to hold off from get­ting any insu­rance until they are actually sick.

Pro­blem sol­ved, you say?

Ahh, but now it appears that the third leg of the tri­nity will be rule that it will be ille­gal to not have insurance!

So young healthy peo­ple will be for­ced to buy way over­pri­ced (rela­tive to their risk) insu­rance. Plus if said young healthy peo­ple make good money, they can look for­ward to paying more taxes to sub­si­dize the purchase of said insu­rance by others.

Gua­ran­teed Issue, Com­mu­nity Rating, Indi­vi­dual Man­date. They sound so rea­so­na­ble and inno­cuous, but they are frea­kin’ lethal.

Other Chain Yankers:

Love that some film cri­tic is ques­tio­ning the ethics of the DA in the Polanski case, and only 1 WAPO colum­nist out of 3 not defen­ding him. Thank you Eugene.

While were on ethics, I don’t care if the Polanski case is poli­ti­cally moti­va­ted. It doesn’t make Polanski any less guilty, nor does his age, or his films. His genius means nothing to me. I could have lived without his films. We gain nothing by them, at least not more than we lose by let­ting someone who raped, and drug­ged, a 13 year old go free, because genius, cele­brity, entit­le­ment, and the sup­port of various film industry per­sona, makes some think he should.

Peace

Share This
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • FriendFeed
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks

Tags: , , ,

32 Responses to “Yanking My Chain This Week”

  1. jakeNo Gravatar says:

    So were like China, most of Africa, some of South Ame­rica and what’s that? Kazakhstan??

    Way to go USA.

    The media is loving this Polanski thing. The indig­nance of some toward his arrest is hard to figure.
    jake´s last blog ..Ravens

    • cooperNo Gravatar says:

      The media is use­less. I used to love Ander­son Coo­per now I just want him to shut up.

      Yea, we stand with the best in social jus­tice don’t we.

  2. The fact of the mat­ter is that we, the pro­gres­si­ves, have empo­we­red Democ­rats to behave this way. We give them the bene­fit of the doubt because we know that we need to deal with a Repu­bli­can Party that in power behave like over­lords and out of power behave like petu­lant chil­dren. But they’ve done nothing to deserve it. Not really.

    I remem­ber watching the news Newt and Co. when voted to shut down the govern­ment because Clin­ton wasn’t let­ting them have their way. And Clin­ton coming out in his second term dec­la­ring that “the era of big govern­ment is over”

    Before this shit star­ted, Obama was in favor of sin­gle payer and Bau­cus was in favor of the public option. Today Bau­cus said twice that he would vote against the public option because he couldn’t get to 60 votes with it.

    Do you know how I know it doesn’t take 60 votes to pass a bill in the Senate? Because Article 1 Sec­tion 3 Clause 4 of the Cons­ti­tu­tion says:

    The Vice Pre­si­dent of the Uni­ted Sta­tes shall be Pre­si­dent of the Senate, but shall have no Vote, unless they be equally divided.

    Wake me when we have Sena­tors who care more about the will of the Peo­ple than the whi­ning of the oppo­si­tion and the coin in their cam­paign cof­fers
    EsotericWombat´s last blog ..Only in the Uni­ted Sta­tes Senate

    • cooperNo Gravatar says:

      I’ve been doub­ting them for a long time now, months. They should be asha­med. I hope that ever­yone of them lose their jobs. It’s a game to them, they want to say they did something so they settle for something much worse than anything we have and the insu­rance com­pa­nies are loving it.

      We are a lazy peo­ple though, most peo­ple my age have no idea how scre­wed they now are.

  3. joegNo Gravatar says:

    I wish I could take away the fear your gene­ra­tion should be fee­ling. I can’t. You’re scre­wed. I’m right behind you though, an X’er.

    I hear you on Polanski. I loved Chi­na­town one of the best movies ever made, Rosemary’s Baby is a clas­sic, The Piano a mas­ter­piece, The Tenant — see it if you haven’t. That’s it,he did some really bad stuff as well.

    Jus­tice, funny word, don’t see it often enough.

    • cooperNo Gravatar says:

      Yeah I’m pretty sure we are scre­wed, no one will notice it for awhile though, most peo­ple my age are too busy trying to pay for their apart­ments because after 4 years of college they can’t find a job that pays well enough to pay the rent.

  4. I’ve been telling ever­yone who would lis­ten (not many) this is how it would play out after I heard Obama’s speech. It was obvious then that the Dems had no sto­mach for a fight, and were willing to com­pro­mise almost everything just to say they “pas­sed health care reform.” That blog quote is exactly right. But we in Ame­rica don’t believe in facts, or science, or rea­lity. The media is beyond use­less.
    Fran­cis Scudellari´s last blog ..Per-happy Spins

  5. mojo shiversNo Gravatar says:

    I’m all for Uni­ver­sal Health Care as long as it doesn’t involve me paying more for it. I just basi­cally want to walk into a hos­pi­tal for anything that may be wrong with me and walk out without having to spend anything for the ordeal.
    mojo shivers´s last blog ..I Can’t Accept That It’s Over, I Will Block The Door Like A Goa­lie Ten­ding The Net, In The Third Quar­ter, Of A Tied-Game Rivalry

  6. DougNo Gravatar says:

    OK, but coun­ting yan­ked chains, who was it that cam­paig­ned on uni­ver­sal health care without an indi­vi­dual man­date only to be “per­sua­ded” once in office.

    They’re scoun­drels for the insu­rance com­pa­nies and scoun­drels for the peo­ple.
    Doug´s last blog ..Barris­ter

    • cooperNo Gravatar says:

      Oh, I am per­fectly aware of that. Just because I wan­ted him to be pre­si­dent over that other old man does’t mean I wasn’t per­fectly ware this could happen.

      I know natio­nal heath care would have had to involve a per­so­nal man­date, it is the only way it is suc­cess­ful, but now we get something the insu­rance com­pa­nies wan­ted, a man­date, without even a public fuc­king option. Sadly most peo­ple my age have no idea what this will end up mea­ning for them down the road.

      • DougNo Gravatar says:

        Actually, sad­der than that, I think, is that most of your gene­ra­tion won’t unders­tand what has hap­pe­ned to them when it’s hap­pe­ned.
        Doug´s last blog ..Brain

      • DougNo Gravatar says:

        Oh, and I didn’t mean to cri­ti­cize Obama’s voters. I just got set off a little when he said he’d been “per­sua­ded” of the need for a man­date. All in all, a fine choice given the choi­ces.
        Doug´s last blog ..Brain

  7. ChrisNo Gravatar says:

    It’s very pos­si­ble we will end up with something worse than we have now. If there is no public option, then we will be back in five years going through this whole thing again. Regu­la­ting the insu­rance indus­tries won’t create reform. All it will do is create more bureauc­racy, which will actually require its very own regulation.

    For all the money we’ve spent in Iraq alone, we could have ten years of a public option pro­gram in this country. Tax payer money going right back to tax payers. Why is it easier to rec­klessly invade a foreign country, kill hun­dreds of thou­sands of peo­ple just so our news media can get a hard on?
    Chris´s last blog ..Dou­ble Tal­king Extre­mism

    • cooperNo Gravatar says:

      I’m really mad at the Democ­rats who could have pushed a Natio­nal Plan and fuck the ins­ruance com­pa­nies, as they should have. We know now for sure, as if there was any doubt, who run Washing­ton and it isn’t any one of them.

      • ChrisNo Gravatar says:

        I’m with ya. We let Tea Bag­gers tal­king about death panels win. Sure insu­rance com­pa­nies pum­ped millions into it, but in the end the debate flo­wed without the basic level of sanity wha­tsoe­ver.
        Chris´s last blog ..Deep Thought

  8. piaNo Gravatar says:

    I have to be sel­fish here. Ever since the insu­rance agent told me I was lying and I had to prove a nega­tive which is impos­si­ble I have been sca­red to go to the doc­tor. I ans­we­red the ques­tions as they were asked. They didn’t ask about con­di­tions I might have had in the past I rea­lize now that was so they could deny the claims

    Coo­per if anything hap­pens to me I don’t want to have go through my resour­ces and sell my house which is a dis­tinct possibility.

    Yes I know insu­rance com­pa­nies are ban­king on peo­ple like me who want pre-existing con­di­tions and recis­son to end so thou­sands more appli­cants can join in each state if they can afford the premium

    I live for the day I can call the insu­rance agent and say “you lie.”

    Yes I want a public option. I think that is the mar­ker of a civi­li­zed society

    And I know I sound like a bro­ken record but are peo­ple like me who are willing to pay more than we should so we can be fully cove­red sup­po­sed to wait until we get on Medi­care – if that still exists to be sick? Because life doesn’t work like that/

    I think pre-existing con­di­tions and res­cis­sion should end right now and then we figure out the rest. Other­wise you might have to have bene­fits for me some­day and you’re too busy
    pia´s last blog ..

    • cooperNo Gravatar says:

      I am not for a man­date that doesn’t allow an option no mat­ter who they cover and I think this will be a very big mis­take for the country down the road. Somewhere in there the com­pa­nies will find a way to cost shift something they have been doing inc­rea­singly over the last few years.

      I’m just blown away by these things of course and wish I had time to write let­ters all day long to mem­bers of con­gress and wished I was an anarchist and could spit on their cars. Alas I have papers to write, and research to do.

  9. ChrisNo Gravatar says:

    It ate my com­ment :(
    Chris´s last blog ..Deep Thought

  10. johnNo Gravatar says:

    I could see the wri­ting on this wall for a long time now. It is so disap­poin­ting. Angering.

    If you think things look bleak now, just wait a few years. This is not accep­ta­ble and shoudn’t be accep­ta­ble to anyone.

    I don’t care about Polanski, as much as I care that they really let him get away with it until it became a poli­ti­cal move.
    john´s last blog ..The Next Ame­ricn Pun­dit

  11. IkeNo Gravatar says:

    Coop…

    I’m of a mind to boy­cott any and all of the peo­ple on the peti­tion for Polanski: http://j.mp/osagx

    It’s one thing to stick by a friend — it’s another to make asi­nine pleas that are thinly-disguised ratio­na­li­za­tions for the notion that “artists” should get their own cushio­ned penal code… or that “not wor­king in Holly­wood for 32 years” cons­ti­tu­tes “punishment.”

    The arro­gance is galling.

  12. BenNo Gravatar says:

    I’m back fore­ver and how I wish it were not the case. It’s hard to get handle on all this stuff pas­sing for news over here. How you can hear anything above the shou­ting is hard to unders­tand. I’ll find out soon enough I guess.
    Ben´s last blog ..Back For Good

  13. sauerkrautNo Gravatar says:

    How can some of the sena­tors vote against a public option but vote to spend tens of millions on use­less abs­ti­nence education?

    Perhaps they think that will result in Polanski lea­ving the 13-y.o. alone.

    There was a time when I liked Har­vey Weins­tein and Debra Win­ger. I dunno bout him no more but she sure is a din­ger.
    sauerkraut´s last blog ..Kanye goes “Joe Wil­son” on Tay­lor Swift

  14. laketreesNo Gravatar says:

    yeah..Cooper
    well Polanski dis­gus­ted me just as Woody Allen does…and I’m not really that ena­mo­red of their work either.…
    laketrees´s last blog ..a tour of my stu­dio.…