Interesting Incidentals

I’m dis­trac­ted by the fact that my windshield was crac­ked ear­lier this eve­ning during a hail storm. Con­se­quently I’m not much for wri­ting ori­gi­nal con­tent this eve­ning. Ins­tead I’m rea­ding things like a friend’s medi­cal bill from an imme­diate medi­cal care center.

The bill from the imme­diate care cen­ter is for the sutu­ring of a fin­ger. The imme­diate care cen­ter accep­ted insu­rance, but as he has a $1200 deduc­ti­ble he expec­ted this to be something he had to pay in full because the deduc­ti­ble hadn’t been met. The bill has two columns of char­ges. The amount insu­rance would pay if he had no deduc­ti­ble is $329.78. The excess was 446.22. So he had to pay $329.78 because his insu­rance com­pany has a con­tract with the imme­diate care cen­ter, which is owned and run by the local hospital.

This is good yes?

Is $329.78 a rea­so­na­ble charge for the ser­vice? Accor­ding to him the doc­tor spent 1/2 hour with him, at most, sutu­ring his fin­ger. That would mean the doc­tor por­tion could be $329.78 an hour ( 164.89 for the half hour) with the $164.89 going toward cost of equip­ment and admi­nis­tra­tive fees — I’m not sure exactly how they divide it up that is just one of many pos­si­bi­li­ties. That seems rea­so­na­ble to me. Yet, if the indi­vi­dual going there did not have insu­rance it would have cost him $776 for the same ser­vice, jac­king the doc­tor fee up to what is equal to $776 an hour ($388 for the half hour) with $388.00 in administrative/medical equip­ment fees. Not so reasonable.

There is appa­rently some kind of “gun to the head” situa­tion going on here. Have insu­rance, even though we jac­ked up the pre­mium 18 per­cent this year, or get char­ged dou­ble what you’d have to pay if you had insu­rance? I can only ask why. Why do peo­ple without insu­rance get what appears to be an unrea­so­na­ble charge? Why is there not just a fair and rea­so­na­ble charge?

Things I’ve read:

The big­gest poli­ti­cal fight of the week, sadly, over libe­rals not coming out and com­plai­ning loud enough about that ridi­cu­lous misogy­nis­tic play­boy article (sorry about this link) tou­ted proudly on Poli­tico and com­plai­ned about on some AOL poli­ti­cal site. Both posts were pulled. The article was a sick piece of work about women Guy something or other would love to fuck even though he hates them. Having dec­ried Play­boy as a piece of misogy­nis­tic trash when I was 18 years old it is merely redun­dant to do so again. The more dis­tur­bing thing is rea­ding the com­ments on various sites, where it doesn’t look like either libe­ral or con­ser­va­tive men have a great deal of res­pect for women. The lar­gest dif­fe­rence I see is that con­ser­va­tive sites remove com­ments that show that to be the case, or don’t allow com­ments at all, and libe­ral sites do not, flaun­ting their misogyny for all too see. Men are way too ski­lled at attac­king a women on their looks, sex appeal, choice of clothing, or their atti­tude, rather than her ideas. A rein­for­ced nug­get of pre­vious know­ledge was all that excur­sion onto the blo­gesphere got me.

Sur­vi­ving the World. Loving it.

Top Ten Black Blogs for June. Some great blogs there, with more added every month.

The worst in-kind dona­tions, from Good Inten­tions are Not Enough

Ross Douthat Makes No Sense.

Kabul’s K Street Pro­ject see­king more lobb­yists. Where Afghanistan’s ambas­sa­dor learns the rules of accep­ta­ble corrup­tion in D.C.

What I Watched:

Mil­dred Pierce, pretty good movie if you like that kind of thing.

peace

Share This
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • SphereIt
  • Mixx
  • FriendFeed

30 Comments

  • That image shows Megyn Kelly, whom I’ve seen on Fox News, and don’t care very much for just as I hold little res­pect for much of Fox News.

    Megyn Kelly as most all on Fox News are pup­pets to serve up tabloid red­neck repu­bli­can imi­ta­tion news.
    The only rea­son I watch Fox News is when I’m really bored to test how long it takes before it insults, and pis­ses me off. Usually it only takes no more than about a minute before I’m angry and change the chan­nel.
    So no I don’t dis­like her as a per­son , or gen­der, but purely for the machine she works for that pumps out trash news to a large per­cen­tage of igno­rant Ame­ri­can small min­ded people.

    Last month Megyn Kelly gave a report about Hub­ble being wor­ked on and she asked:” Where did Hub­ble get it’s name?“
    She then loo­ked off camera & someone said:” It’s named after the com­pany that made it.“
    Megyn Kelly replies:” Can we get someone to look that up, and find out where the Hub­ble teles­cope got it’s name?”

    No, I don’t hate woman, but I strongly dis­like women dum­ber than 5th gra­ders sprea­ding their igno­rance to millions Ame­ri­cans daily.

    Bennet’s last blog post..Phi­lo­sophi­cal Quan­dary Of Our Existence

  • Sorry, I was dis­trac­ted. I hate Fox New, obviously.

    Like Fox news these sto­ries from such maga­zi­nes are desig­ned to gene­ra­lize everything, in order to dumb everything down, and make a story out of nothing, ver­ses real stories

    I don’t hate or dis­like women, even though I some­ti­mes hate their moti­ves. Gene­ra­li­zing in gene­ral is usually quite unwise. I believe any women, or anyone of any race can do anything so long as they want to. Pretty basic I know. Just dis­re­gard, like I do Fox News…even though the horri­ble truth is that millions of peo­ple feed into these sim­pli­fied dumps­ter diving igno­rance of so called News every day.

    What else can we do?

    Bennet’s last blog post..Phi­lo­sophi­cal Quan­dary Of Our Existence

  • It makes me glad that I’m in Ger­many, and don’t have to waste my time with things like that Play­boy article — they just never make it over here.
    Exce­llent point about the medi­cal costs. What if some doc­tor just ope­ned up shop and char­ged fair hourly pri­ces for the work. It could start a revolution.

    indeterminacy’s last blog post..Inde­ter­mi­nacy #428

    • Inde, you are lucky in that way any­way. lol
      We need more than a revo­lu­tion I’m afriad.
      I am glad to see you I hope you are well. It seems you have fallen off the face of the earth.

  • I have a friend from Canada who’s con­tem­pla­ting having her wis­dom teeth pulled out. She’s worried because she’s never been to a den­tist before (which is crazy) and because she doesn’t know how she’ll pay for it if it ends up being expensive.

    I don’t know what kind of sys­tem we live in where peo­ple are afraid to get the care they need to become healthy or stay healthy for fear of win­ding up in the poor house.

    mojo shivers’s last blog post..There’s A Rea­son For The Sunshiny Sky, There’s A Rea­son Why I’m Fee­ling So High, Must Be The Sea­son When Those Love Lights Shine All Around Us

  • I usually just bleed.

    Doug’s last blog post..Truth­ful

  • Everything about the Ame­ri­can medi­cal sys­tem has to be chan­ged. It’s too bad Hillary for­ced her pro­gram onto con­gress and that peo­ple fell for absurd “Harry & Louise” com­mer­cials – this could have been chan­ged fif­teen years ago
    I have insu­rance but it doesn’t cover everything yet I pay the same pre­mium as a per­son who does get everything paid and often is sic­ker than I and uses the insu­rance more often. It doesn’t make sense but an underw­ri­ter deci­des and the insu­rance com­pany and insu­rance reps get to play “nice guy” and blame it on the underwriter

    pia’s last blog post..Life’s a bitch

  • Sorry about your windshield

    I wish Bill and Hil hadn’t been so heavy han­ded in 94 and went to Con­gress with their pro­po­sal without having Con­gress par­ti­ci­pate. And the infa­mous health industry “Harry & Louise” com­mer­cials which for some rea­son sca­red people

    I also wish “pre exis­ting con­di­tions” clau­ses would end today as you pay the same as some­body without them – who might be much sic­ker. I have paid into the insu­rance industry all my adult life yet when I moved it was as if I never had insu­rance before. That said all peo­ple should be given equal access to health care

    pia’s last blog post..Life’s a bitch

    • So hope­fully this time around things will work out bet­ter? I do not have high hopes, due to all the misin­for­ma­tion out there. The guy who is run­ning ad cam­paigns against a more natio­nal plan was fired from his job due to stea­ling millions from the com­pany …hope the public starts using the inter­net to dig for truth…if there is such a think.

  • Is there a cate­gory for “insu­red, but can’t afford to go to the doctor?”

    Bone’s last blog post..Saved By The Bell: The Reunion

    • Most peo­ple but not the peo­ple wor­king in the legis­la­tion. That is the rea­son nothing will get done, they have health insurance.

  • The offer of dog food to Kenya to help with their food cri­sis??? That sounds like a sick, per­ver­ted joke.

    And $329.78 to suture a fin­ger. We’re living in a Catch-22 society. It’s all cra­zi­ness, and there’s no way around it.

    actonbell’s last blog post..Of Jer­ki­ness and Luckiness

    • The list is even worse than that really.
      Aid in gene­ral is very strange, we give aid in many cases by pro­fi­ting from the aid we give..ie corn, arms, and so on and so forth. There is no real eva­lua­tion in timely man­ner as to if that aid works…it’s com­pli­ca­ted but sad really how much money goes to things which are almost useless.

  • In this state that is what hap­pens. Not sure about other sta­tes but the fees for unin­su­red are often dou­ble that for those insu­red. That is an insu­rance greed issue. I guess the medi­cal faci­li­ties use the unin­su­red to make up for the amount they don’t get from the peo­ple with insu­rance con­tracts. I think 329 is high for a sutu­ring, never mind 776.

    I’m with you. I read less of those kind of sites these days the argu­ments are about stu­pid things, why give Play­boy any press, they are fai­ling any­way and on their way out

    jacob’s last blog post..Vaca­tion House Hunting

    • yes I’m not health care per­son, I don’t study it at all spe­ci­fi­cally, but that bill was kind of inte­res­ting. I know dif­fe­rent sta­tes ope­rate dif­fe­rently regar­ding health care and Mary­land does have some of the stric­test laws or rules to those who pro­vide health­care here but it is get­ting worse. I can’t ima­gine what hap­pens in other states.

  • That play­boy hulla­ba­loo was gar­bage you are right. What they should be tal­king about is
    MEDICAL FLEECING. The 776.00 is rob­bery but the 329.00 is not that rea­so­na­ble either, depen­ding on how many sutu­res there were. We pay for the admi­nis­trate fees usually cau­sed by insu­rance com­pany red tape, most doc­tors now have peo­ple who spend all day long dea­ling with insu­rance com­pa­nies, and even then it’s not easy. Makes no sense. We also pay for the excess litigation.

    I like the sur­vi­ving the world, it’s a non stress read.
    johnm´s last blog ..While I’m Working

  • flee­cing is a good word.

  • Yep, most doctors/hospitals adjust for insu­rance. I’ve been going to the chi­ro­prac­tor for a cou­ple weeks and because I have insu­rance my bill was $1200, without insu­rance the bill would be $2600. So the chi­ro­prac­tor adjusts for insu­rance pay­ments and then I pay a co-payment of $20. Insu­rance covers the dif­fe­rence. In other words, insu­rance com­pa­nies get to set the pri­ces and depen­ding on if you have insu­rance or not, the price is adjus­ted accordingly.

    It’s good for those who have insu­rance but terri­ble for those who don’t.
    Chris´s last blog ..You Can Be Part Of Big Love Too!

  • The insu­rance com­pa­nies don’t always set the right price. If there is a rea­so­na­ble fee for a ser­vice that should be the rea­so­na­ble fee. Why there is such a disc­re­pancy is a ques­tion ans­we­red dif­fe­rently by the medi­cal esta­blish­ment than by the insu­rance mafia. I give up.

    gdp gdp gdp

    Play­boy sucks should be enough of a sta­te­ment and it should only have to be given one time.
    I always like the links.
    jake´s last blog ..Wel­come to Bawl­mer Hon, 2009 Hon Fest

  • The insu­rance situa­tion is a night­mare. One of my stu­dents and his mom both had such bad teeth, and even though they have health insu­rance she paid more than she really could afford for it and couldn’t afford den­tal plan or to pay for a clea­ning. No den­tist would take pay­ments. I tal­ked to my old den­tist who is such a hunk of a nice guy and he found someone near them who was good and would take pay­ments, they were too far away from my guy.

    Some­ti­mes peo­ple just need a little of that kind of help.

    As if ever­yone doesn’t already know PB is a peace of crap. It’s like they just figu­red it out.
    kait´s last blog ..Great Ideas in Black and White

    • Don’t get me star­ted on the den­tal thing again either. I know if your teeth are in good con­di­tion you feel bet­ter and are likely to be healthier ove­rall. You’d think they’d inc­lude it just for pre­ven­ta­tive measures.

  • Medi­cal insu­rance is over-rated. It only pro­vi­des par­tial cove­rage as so many things are exempt and doc­tors often send their own sepa­rate bills. I had a visit to the ER last year. The insu­rance was sup­po­sed to cover everything. Des­pite insu­rance paying seve­ral thou­sands of dollars, I still get bills from various doc­tors offi­ces for pro­ce­du­res and ser­vi­ces I do not even recall. Hell, I only remem­ber tal­king to a cou­ple of doc­tors. But I’ve got­ten “con­sult with patient” invoi­ces from at least 8 I never tal­ked to.

    Your friend is bet­ter off paying the 329. Pro­bably chea­per and he won’t be get­ting invoi­ces for the rest of his life.

    • The 329 wasn’t my real con­cern it was that if he didn’t have insu­rance he would be char­ged 776.00, and expec­ted to pay it.

      I must have great insu­rance. I get no bills for anything at all. Then again I have a ppo, no refe­rrals nee­ded. In this state, I think it dif­fers from state to state, if a doc­tor or cli­nic has a con­tract with an insu­rance com­pany they can only charge what the insu­rance com­pany calls rea­so­na­ble and can’t recoup the extra. That is not neces­sa­rily the case in other states.