Wednesday Wonderings, WTF’s and Sound Bites.

The Church of Scien­to­logy is on trial in France, accu­sed of “tar­ge­ting vul­ne­ra­ble peo­ple for com­mer­cial gain”. I’m not an expert on Scien­to­logy, know little of it except that Greta Van Sus­te­ren — FOX news semi talking-head for­merly of CNN — is one, as is her hus­band John Coale, a high ran­king Scien­tio­lo­gist and trial law­yer, was appoin­ted by my Gover­nor to the Board of Direc­tors of UMMS (Uni­ver­sity of Mary­land­Me­di­cal Sys­tem). I’ve read the appoint­ment is pos­si­ble pay­back of a cam­paign debt dona­tion. I have no way of kno­wing if this is true of course. I am inte­res­ted in how this plays out in France though.

I flip­ped over to the Scien­to­logy web­site site and took a test. I can get the results when I go to my appoint­ment at their place off of Dupont Circle in D.C..

Spea­king of Spa­ceships, I now know I am one, thanks to Quilly, who sent me on this trans­por­ta­tion quiz.

You may won­der why I am taking trans­por­ta­tion quiz­zes. I’ve come to the conc­lu­sion that beco­ming a sound­bite online pre­vents one from beco­ming a sound­bite in real life.

Pesky anno­yan­ces:

I don’t know if the NYT assig­ned this dude this piece, or if he viciously grab­bed at it with both of his little new wave con­ser­va­tive man hands, but Libe­ra­ted and Unhappy, where Ross Douthat calls for a need to stig­ma­tize sin­gle mothers, and other com­men­tary as likely to have come from my grand­fathers bar­ber as anywhere else, is a sur­pri­singly shitty piece even for an op-ed. It’s based on this piece of work…The Para­dox of Dec­li­ning Female Hap­pi­ness by Whar­ton School eco­no­mists Betsey Ste­ven­son and Jus­tin Wolfers.

A sub­jec­tive study, when pos­sibly objec­tive data, such as over the last 35 years female sui­cide rates have dec­li­ned, while male sui­cide rates have inc­rea­sed, is not inc­lu­ded, and there is no way to know that the vast­ness of the line the “hap­pi­ness scale” in on these days, as oppo­sed to 35 years ago, , makes it most likely…not much of a change after all. Douthat notes that the authors “avoid floa­ting an easy expla­na­tion for their data”. Obli­vious to the fact that they avoi­ded floa­ting an easy expla­na­tion because there isn’t one, he makes up one that works for him, and the NYT actually published it.

Soto­ma­yor:

Ah, someone who wants to never for­get there are real world con­se­quen­ces to her decisions…novel. My life bud G is pulling for her.

G:“Finally someone with Type 1 (immune media­ted) dia­be­tes on the Supreme Court”.

PEACE

Before someone gets a bug up their bot­tom, although he was being sar­cas­tic, G has had JD since he was 12.

Share This
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • SphereIt
  • Mixx
  • FriendFeed

29 Comments

  • What’s this? Two tests in 24 hours? Do you miss under­grad that badly? ;)

    The Church of Scientology’s scary, and not just because they have the weir­dest and most sinister-looking logo since the black Haken­kreuz. They find out you’re repea­ting the story that L. Ron Hub­bard, a wri­ter of B-grade (to be cha­ri­ta­ble) science fic­tion, laid a bet that he could invent a reli­gion and make money off it, they’ll sue you for everything you’ve got. Perhaps the sca­riest part of all is when you rea­lize that Scientology’s claims, to a disin­te­res­ted skep­ti­cal obser­ver, are neither more nor less bogus than the claims of every other religion.

    But then again, if We the Peo­ple were smar­ter, we’d be spea­king of gen­der roles in (I sug­gest) terms of resource allo­ca­tion as modi­fied by con­tem­po­rary advan­ces in tech­no­logy, not in terms of fos­si­li­zed utte­ran­ces reflec­ting (lite­rally) Stone Age technology.

    You and Quilly may be spa­ceships, I’ll be … well, I’ll never know. Guess I’d rather be a sound­bite in real time. ;)

    the amoeba’s last blog post..“Daddy” Can’t Save Her This Time

    • Blame Quilly.

      I think France had it right though, but fear they’ve already infil­tra­ted ins­ti­tu­tions in this country to the point of no return.

  • Scien­to­logy has long tried to ride off the back of the Church of Chris­tian Scien­tists. Just take a look at Tom Cruise and see how Scien­to­logy has used sham psycho­logy to snare the lost and uncer­tain into a life of beg­ging money for the few at the top of the pyramid.

  • Ross Douthat is the token Times con­se­ra­ti­tive colum­nist. Appa­rently he was a blog­ger is sup­po­sed to appeal to righ­tists of your age and perhaps older. Ignore him. Though his first column threw me as it was writ­ten to make cen­trists like him

    pia’s last blog post..3WW: dreary; embrace; timid: fic­tion: Late Spring of Etan

    • I’ve read him before elsewhere, The Atlan­tic as someone said and a few other sites. He had periods where he actually made sense, not that often but some­ti­mes. This piece was just a total miss.

  • France calls it like they see it, orga­ni­zed crime. But aren’t many reli­gions, if not at least their indi­vi­dual churches, prac­ti­cing orga­ni­zed crime?

    The Douthat piece was a mess, i thought he’d be bet­ter, he see­med so at The Atlan­tic” , maybe I expec­ted less of him there, or I didn’t read him enough because he was a great big yawner.

    The JDF lobby?

    johnm’s last blog post..The World’s Sport and the World – Links

  • I knew about the D.C. church, they have more of their share of inside the belt­way scieon­to­lo­gists, more than I’d like, but not anyone whose sig­ni­fi­cance would assault me.

    “don’t know if the NYT assig­ned this dude this piece, or if he viciously grab­bed at it with both of his little new wave con­ser­va­tive man hands,”

    It’s the second one.

    “”Finally someone with Type 1 (immune media­ted) dia­be­tes on the Supreme Court”.”

    You’d have to have jd pull that one off.

    jacob’s last blog post..Happy Memo­rial Day Weekend

  • Your grandfather’s bar­ber or a Cave­man. Be about the same to me.

    Chris’s last blog post..More Fear From Crusty Old White Men

  • Any “reli­gion” where Tom Cruise” is a psychothe­ra­pist has some pro­blems. Most reli­gions are a bit insane, but this one looks dan­ge­rous. I doubt they will get Scien­to­logy in France they’ll just get the indi­vi­duals. I thought they had a church in Southern Mary­land but I loo­ked and it doesn’t seem to be the case.

    The NYT is des­pe­rate. Anger makes for lots of hits, espe­cially if the piece is stu­pid and insul­ting. I think the “new wave con­ser­va­tive man hands” as you called them pro­bably grab­bed for it.

    I don’t know enough about this women, but from my short trip around I think she’s a good choice. Bet­ter than a good from my pulpit.

    caseyjake’s last blog post..Syra­cuse You Are Sick

  • Hmmm…seems to me I took one of those tests a cou­ple of years ago. Someone called me and invi­ted me to visit them to dis­cuss my results further. Um, no thank you. I con­ti­nue to give any reli­gion a wide berth and have got­ten to the point where I can suc­cess­fully bite my ton­gue when the need to sup­press my opi­nions is emi­nent. I am sooooo out of touch these days. Unfor­gi­va­ble, truly.

    • I took it after rea­ding the French thing. I should have figu­red I’d not get my results until I show up. Didn’t give them my real phone number.

    • Yea I took that test on line, but they wouldn’t give me the results until I “came in”. Like that’s gonna hap­pen. lol

  • Unve­ri­fia­ble run a muck.
    I never really unders­tood how accu­rate any data on people’s hap­pi­ness could be recor­ded, since I know from my own expe­rience I go through many shifts within a day.
    Ask me in the mor­ning before cof­fee if I’m happy, and I’ll say go to hell. After cof­fee, I might say:” I love life, it’s wonderful”

    I just don’t know how emo­tions can pos­sibly be mea­su­red accu­ra­tely even under such gene­ra­li­zed circumstances.

    • Well, they tried and their methods were sound but the data was sub­jec­tive, the op-ed wri­ter didn’t really use the data though only the soundbites.

    • hey where did you go?

      • I am sorry. Once again, I’ve killed my blog.

        I feel as though I’m repea­ting myself in blog­ging, and with only you & 1 other rea­der I’m happy to have sha­red, but it’s emba­rras­sing. Part of blog­ging, means fishing for rea­ders, which I don’t have the dedi­ca­tion to do anymore.

        I’m more inte­res­ted in Twit­ter these days. Lea­ving snip­pets of abs­tract jibberish.

        My posts IMO have mostly been about com­plai­ning, which I’m trying des­pe­ra­tely to get away from doing.

        So sorry, and thank you very much for your loyalty, and atten­tion. I’ve always appre­cia­ted your presence.

      • Plus with the Bush Era (Redh­neck God fea­ring Bigotry) gone, I feel more balan­ced, and less need to complain.

        Still much change is nee­ded, but at least now that balan­ced wis­dom seems to be more in power these days my view is less dreary. Less spiteful.

  • I pretty much have the same opi­nion as May­nard James Kee­nan. I’m really not into paying for salvation.

    Chris’s last blog post..100 Days of the Stimulus

    • The Catho­lic church is a big pro­mo­ter of paying for sal­va­tion, they of course don’t see it that way.

      • I was rai­sed pen­te­cos­tal, so it all depen­ded upon how disc­ri­mi­na­tory you could be against women. There’s nothing holier than a wife at home bare­foot and preg­nant. That pretty much gua­ran­teed you sal­va­tion at my church.

        Chris’s last blog post..Crusty Old White Men Are Sca­red To Death!

  • I flip­ped over to the Scien­to­logy web­site site and took a test. I can get the results when I go to my appoint­ment at their place off of Dupont Circle in D.C.

    Are you sure you’re allo­wed to give out the loca­tion? :)

    Most of my know­ledge of Scien­to­logy comes from South Park. (Am I still allo­wed to com­ment here after making that statement?)

    And wow, that article was horrid. Com­plete with a Sarah Palin reference.

    Bone’s last blog post..Three-thirty-one

    • The loca­tion is public or the buil­ding would pro­bably be hid­den under Ivy.

      Yeah really, it was a mess.

  • Pas­sing pri­vate email on is a …felony…? ;)

    I know a mem­ber of that church, if it is a church. That’s all I’m going to say.
    It looks like he took the abs­tract of that piece and deci­ded it fit his ideo­logy and went with it pro­du­cing that awful op-ed. No one wants to work these days.