They’d Like To Teach The World To Sing In Perfect Harmony

I’d like to build the world a home
And fur­nish it with love
Grow apple trees and honey bees and snow-white turtle doves

While you were lamen­ting your shrin­king invest­ment port­fo­lio, dis­cus­sing whether Adam (Ame­ri­can Idol) looks bet­ter with or without eye liner and fin­ger­nail polish, and worr­ying about Obama’s ove­rex­po­sure on natio­nal tele­vi­sion, the Uni­ted Nations was once again making a moc­kery of them­sel­ves. The 47 mem­ber Human Rights Coun­cil pas­sed a non bin­ding reso­lu­tion that sug­gests coun­tries around the world seriously con­si­der pro­mo­ting tole­rance and unders­tan­ding bet­ween cul­tu­res, reli­gions and races. OMG.

I’d like to teach the world to sing
In per­fect har­mony
I’d like to hold it in my arms and keep it company

What’s so horri­ble about that you ask? Well, nothing on the sur­face. Beyond the crust howe­ver this reso­lu­tion, first intro­du­ced to the Com­mis­sion on Human Rights in 1999 by Pakis­tan on behalf of the Orga­ni­za­tion of Isla­mic Con­fe­rence under the agenda item on “racism, is the “Dear John” let­ter of reso­lu­tions. Even pretty deep into it (the wor­king reso­lu­tion pdf) it all sounds pretty “UN We are The Worl­dish”. You read along and feel like brea­king into a cho­rus of I’d Like To Teach The World To Sing. You’re saying “yes” inside your head, and then you come across the clincher, the “It’s not you, it’s me, I will always love you, I just can’t be with you”, of the reso­lu­tion. You rea­lize you’ve been duped. You read the sug­ges­tion that “media watch what they say and who they cri­ti­cize”. Then the most cer­tain, true intent is made clear as they say “even though ever­yone has the right to hold opi­nions, and free­dom of expres­sion is good, it might be wise to enact laws to shut up those who don’t know how to handle the spe­cial duties and res­pon­si­bi­li­ties that come with these rights”.

You might con­si­der this unim­por­tant, the West in gene­ral voted against, or abs­tai­ned from voting, and always has, as did India, and it won’t affect us any­way. Don’t be so sure. Jour­na­lists, and some of our fellow blog­gers, are get­ting jai­led at an inc­rea­singly alar­ming rate. We have to pay atten­tion to this. In a world where we are res­pon­si­ble in some way for huma­nity, where in some parts of Afgha­nis­tan girls are again being denied edu­ca­tion due to.… reli­gion, in a decade in which the Uni­ted Nations has agreed that women’s rights are human rights, where UNIFEM pro­mo­tes women’s empo­wer­ment, rights, and gen­der equa­lity glo­bally, and where the Sec­re­tary Gene­ral has spe­ci­fi­cally pled­ged to end vio­lence against women, this is giving per­mis­sion to make laws which sup­press and con­se­quently oppress. By sup­pres­sing the voi­ces, you sup­press the cause, be it liberty, jus­tice, or equa­lity. As sta­ted in some of the UN’s own mem­ber nation’s past analy­sis “defa­ma­tion of reli­gions,” as oppo­sed to the defa­ma­tion of per­sons, for­cibly requi­res the state to deter­mine which ideas are accep­ta­ble, as oppo­sed to which facts are true. A fun­da­men­tal rule of law pro­blem pre­sents itself in the notion of “defa­ma­tion of reli­gion”. Sti­fling legi­ti­mate cri­ti­cism or even research on prac­ti­ces and laws appea­ring to be in vio­la­tion of human rights.”

Those who vote con­ti­nually for this reso­lu­tion feel the rights of the orga­ni­za­tion, in this case reli­gion, and more spe­ci­fi­cally Islam, trump the rights of human beings. They see reli­gion as threa­te­ned by cri­ti­cism so they desig­nate free speech the cul­prit of the vio­lence, hatred, and racism, and in so doing set a pretty unsett­ling pic­ture of what could come for those living in nations who sup­port this resolution.

In the name of peace, love, and Allah of course.

For the Love of God, as they say.

Peace.

Pos­sibly of interest:

UN body OKs call to curb reli­gious cri­ti­cism


Review of pro­gress and assess­ment of imple­men­ta­tion of the Dur­ban Dec­la­ra­tion and Pro­gramme of Action by all sta­kehol­ders at the natio­nal, regio­nal and inter­na­tio­nal levels-pdf


UN rights coun­cil ses­sion ends in con­tro­versy

UN Watch

SHATTERING THE RED LINES: THE DURBAN II DRAFT DECLARATION

<a href=‘http://wonderlandornot.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/becket.pdf”>Becket Fund for Reli­gious Liberty Issues Brief, June 2008

Share This
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • SphereIt
  • Mixx
  • FriendFeed

29 Comments

  • This is why I lay the cause of most world­wide con­flicts at the feet of orga­ni­zed reli­gions in the first place. It’s a tough time we live in when we blame the solu­tion and not the cause of intolerance.

    mojo shivers’s last blog post..The Flag Was Flying At Half Mast, And I Was Thin­king ‘Bout How, Ever­yone Is Dying, And Maybe It’s Time To Live

  • Yeah, aren’t you baf­fled no one seems to care about this? Scary times.

    Milena Thomas’s last blog post..My Advice to Sin­gle Moms in Sucky Jobs

    • Baf­fled if I am loo­king at it from my pers­pec­tive but in gene­ral I’m not sur­pri­sed at what peo­ple con­cern them­sel­ves with, usually very little.

  • I’d have cared about it had I heard anything about it. Not something the local or even major state news­pa­pers are head­li­ning. The inter­net helps me find things I might not find other­wise — given i have a limi­ted about of time to spend on it daily — that’s what’s good about rea­ding a bunch of dif­fe­rent blogs.

    is the UN a joke or what? I’m not sure being unver­sed on deep enough, but this sound bullshi­tish to me.

    casey’s last blog post..Happy Anni­ver­sary

    • You have to stop rea­ding lac­rosse blogs then. ;)

      It’s vir­tually mea­nin­gless except for the fact it’s like an “ok go ahead muzzle those peo­ple who are pos­si­ble spea­king truths about your reli­gion because it might incite vio­lence .…or cause some peo­ple to really think about things.…

  • I’ve only met a hand full of Isla­mic peo­ple, and I truly hope most all are not like the few I’ve encoun­te­red.
    Of the few they see­med to be dri­ven by reli­gious con­vic­tion loc­ked in some rather narrow min­ded views.
    If (which I seriously hope not) a majo­rity of them live by these same strong con­vic­tions I won’t lie, I’m sca­red of them.

    I hate ste­reoty­ping peo­ple, I really do, but I will never be com­for­ta­ble with any group that feels jus­ti­fied to act in lunacy based on man made prophecy.

    Oh no! This is going to make me go on another ram­page against reli­gion, and I was so happy not thin­king about them.

    Bennet’s last blog post..I’ve got a 4 inch Iphone in my pants, aren’t you impressed?

  • You can’t turn your head for a sec and look what hap­pens.
    How the UN can spon­sor such sug­ges­tions is what i wanna know.

  • Dear John” let­ter of reso­lu­tions. Even pretty deep into it all sounds pretty “UN We are The Worl­dish”. You read along and feel like brea­king into a cho­rus of I’d Like To Teach The World To Sing. You’re saying “yes” inside your head, and then you come across the clincher, the “It’s not you, it’s me, I will always love you, I just can’t be with you”, of the resolution

    A bri­lliant repre­sen­ta­tion of this reso­lu­tion coo­per. I swear to god . A bit iro­nic given the topic, i know . ;)

  • I wish I could get inheavy convo here but Nova…

    They are already doing this in Afgha­nis­tan, for exam­ple, where Sayed Per­vez Kam­baksh, a stu­dent jour­na­list, was sen­ten­ced to death for blasphemy. Yeah lets resolve to make it ok for more deve­lo­ped coun­tries to do the same.

    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/asia/student-facing-20-years-in-hell-1643069.html

    kait’s last blog post..Som Spring

  • Yeah, the dreams of peo­ple con­tro­lling peo­ple through democ­ra­tic means burns in every breast. But you’re right, the fact that I wasn’t going to comply with that reso­lu­tion isn’t as impor­tant as what hap­pens to those who are expec­ted to.

    Doug’s last blog post..The Refor­ma­tion of Wolfshausen

    • exactly Dog. I don’t think they are going to jail you (yet) for those pratt­les, but just in case I would have some money in the pillow­case and a map of a tun­nel sys­tem to Canada at my fin­ger­tips — if I were you.

  • I had not heard this either, mea­ning I lear­ned two things from this post. The other being that there is another ver­sion of that song that doesn’t con­tain the line “buy the world a Coke.”

    Bone’s last blog post..Wha­te­ver gets you through the day

  • It’s all going to even­tually affect us in some way. It’s a small world.

    g’s last blog post..Noam Speaks

    • Unless you’ve never left your home town. For some peo­ple it’s still a pretty large world in their minds, so they don’t unders­tand how the wave rolls.

  • it sounds a bit like the bill of rights they keep pro­po­sing for the EU — it lists out basi­cally all the rights we have in our own bill of rights, but in dif­fe­rent words, more lega­lise, and then goes on to desc­ribe the exceptions.

    • What’s most worri­some with this is that the coun­tries who sig­ned it are already the coun­tries who tend to oppress, this a UN reso­lu­tion, is just another jus­ti­fi­ca­tion for them.

  • It just goes to show how far we are from our sta­ted beliefs. The free­dom ham­mer is one we repea­tedly throw at third world coun­tries and yet we don’t have the cou­rage to sign on the bot­tom line and vali­date our so-called beliefs. The fact that there is no real social pres­sure to our lea­ders to make this pledge only speaks of the sick­ness in our society.

    Renee’s last blog post..Motherhood Is An Active Choice

    • Sig­ning this would have been pretty unmind­ful, and I can imia­gine sig­ning something which makes it appear to be ok (if not to sanc­tion) to jail peo­ple who cri­ti­cize reli­gion. India had a pretty good res­ponse. Those who abs­tain from yay or nay seem to be trying to work out a reso­lu­tion which does not inc­lude sanc­tio­ning laws to sup­press free speech.

  • I think the UN began with the best of inten­tions but we lear­ned quickly that idea­lism and rea­lity are two sepa­rate enti­ties. I can’t remem­ber the UN ever being effec­tual and ever cau­sing anything but par­king tic­kets and cri­mes by diplo­mats for the peo­ple of New York to pay for

    Yet until Ame­rica gets itself together as a nation and stops figh­ting other coun­tries batt­les anything we sign would be a joke – and i believe we are, somewhere deep down, amongst the best nations

    pia’s last blog post..I moved! And a pic­ture of me from the second era of my life when anything was pos­si­ble – well a link to

    • There are defi­ni­tely some large ques­tions to be asked about the Uni­ted Nations sig­ni­fi­cance when everything seem so diplo­ma­ti­cally hypocritical.

  • The more I pay atten­tion to the UN, the less I like it. But then, given the past 8 years, it’s not all that sur­pri­sing that the UN more reflects world views than simply wes­tern views.

    Not that that chan­ges the double-speak we so often hear from the uber-religious. Nor does it change how poli­ti­cal “lea­ders” view anony­mous blog­gers who type away in their mothers’ base­ment. Take the recent out­ting of a popu­lar Alaska blog­ger by a state legis­la­tor. Yes, I know he didn’t impri­son and kill her, but take a look at how far we have not advan­ced even in this fair country of ours.

    sauerkraut’s last blog post..Gerald Michael Doo­gan sings to AKMuckraker

  • You have to look at it from it ori­gi­nal intent to what it has evol­ved into.