cooper culture
Image 01

Student Athlete an Oxymoron?

March 24th, 2009 by cooper

I’m sit­ting here flip­ping through the manic news, the fran­tic and varied of opi­nions on various eco­no­mic plans and their pos­si­ble out­co­mes. I find it all too much of a maze at this point. I’m temp­ted to watch Ellen to see who is sin­ging in the bath­room this week. I’m even temp­ted to sing in the bath­room myself and send in a video, and I’m fas­ci­na­ted by the news that John Mayer twee­ted him­self out of his rela­tionship with Jen­ni­fer Anis­ton? Yawn.

I came upon some inte­res­ting NCAA Bas­ket­ball Brac­kets. Not the brac­ket I’m losing with at the 20 Something ESPN site either, these are Higher Ed Watch’s Third Annual Aca­de­mic March Mad­ness Brac­kets, a brac­ket dis­play of the eva­lua­tion of the teams “in com­pe­ti­tion of stud­ying for and obtai­ning a mea­ning­ful degree”.

NCAA Gra­dua­tion Suc­cess Rates, Sweet Six­teen. Click to Enlarge.

bracket-gsr

Not sur­pri­singly, as best as can be inter­pre­ted from a not so trans­pa­rent NCCA, most of the top seeds coming in to the tour­ney wouldn’t even come close to cham­pionship sta­tus if aca­de­mics were the basis for the win. Ove­rall the tops seeds have a pretty dis­mal record in gra­dua­ting their ath­le­tes. Taking what is left — the Sweet Six­teen — Villa­nova and Pur­due make the final, with Ari­zona and UConn losing big time whether using the NCAA’s GSR (Gra­dua­tion Suc­cess Rate) or the FGR (Fede­ral Gra­dua­tion Rate). I mean seriously, Ari­zona has appea­red in every NCAA tour­na­ment for the last 50 years and it looks like the stu­dent ath­le­tes, as they like to call them, have the lowest gra­dua­tion rate –13%.

Fede­ral Gra­dua­tion Rates, Sweet Six­teen. Click to Enlarge

bracket-gr

There is no doubt these teams make the schools money, some say in the billions each year across the USA, with millions spent on rec­rui­ting the best pla­yers and coaches, yet only a small num­ber of these pla­yers, as that NCAA bran­ding com­mer­cial cons­tantly reminds us, will ever rea­lize the finan­cial dream from pla­ying a reve­nue sport post college. Most will be doing something else. Appa­rently a large num­ber of them won’t be doing that something else with a college degree in hand. The schools making millions off of these ath­le­tes, in gene­ral, don’t appear too concerned.

Is it any big deal that the gra­dua­tion rates are so paltry, espe­cially in reve­nue sports? Do peo­ple even care? I’m not sure I do, but then again I’ve never really thought of top team Divi­sion 1 pla­yers on reve­nue pro­du­cing teams as stu­dents, at least not for the most part. It’s always see­med like a farce to me. Would it not be bet­ter to rec­ruit a school team which doesn’t have to actually go to school, stop the pre­tense and actually com­pen­sate the pla­yers while they play their 4 years, ins­tead of pre­ten­ding they are stu­dents? If once the school is done making millions off of them they send them on their merry way, degree or not, wouldn’t it make more sense to do it dif­fe­rently? Unless the schools really want to start trying to make these ath­le­tes stu­dents, while con­si­de­ring the ques­tion of whether most of these reve­nue sport ath­le­tes even went to go to be students?

On another tan­gent, wouldn’t it be great if peo­ple got the same adre­na­lin rush — and sense of false pride they get seeing “their team” win — from seeing scien­ti­fic research pro­jects face off against each other in large are­nas, brin­ging in millions in research money, allo­wing schools to rec­ruit top notch stu­dents and professors?

Infor­ma­tion obtai­ned from The Higher Ed Watch Blog.

Share This
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • FriendFeed
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks

Tags: , ,

23 Responses to “Student Athlete an Oxymoron?”

  1. DougNo Gravatar says:

    Some of us do get a rush from scien­ti­fic papers. I don’t need no ESPN to tell me what’s exci­ting. Hey, do you want to hear about some chi-squared dis­tri­bu­tions I found?

    Doug’s last blog post..Out-of-doors

    • cooperNo Gravatar says:

      I thought it was words that gave you a rush??

      “Hey, do you want to hear about some chi-squared dis­tri­bu­tions I found?” Pro­ba­bi­lity not.

  2. gNo Gravatar says:

    I pro­mise you they don’t care, you know I know that.

    I don’t get a rush from science usually, some­ti­mes, not usually. I do get a rush from Phi­lo­sophy and sur­fing, but no one offe­red to pay my way through college fro that and it’s hardly a reve­nue producer.

    Of course it’s a joke at the lar­ger reve­nue pro­du­cing schools, to pre­tend other­wise is fun though, let’s pre­tend they are stu­dents just like me.….some of those schools will chew you and spit you out fas­ter than you can say an I have a pic­kle with that please.

    Still there is that rush …

    g’s last blog post..Por­tia De Rossi Apo­lo­gi­zes For Her Marriage

  3. jacobNo Gravatar says:

    Then there is the ques­tion of those who do get degrees, with a barely pas­sing grade, in what they call “jock majors”. One of those majors that makes you an expert in coaching or something ridi­cu­lous and qua­lify you for not much.

    I’ve known some ste­llar stu­dent ath­le­tes, but when you are tal­king the big money making schools you’re right it’s a farce. I can’t help loving the games any­way. I guess I think of it as “not my pro­blem”. Our cul­ture accepts all this and doesn’t bat an eye.

    jacob’s last blog post..Stuff

    • cooperNo Gravatar says:

      I’m bat­ting both my eye, right now as a mat­ter of fact.
      Honeslt I’ve taken som eheat fo the jock majors thing and really there isn’t anything neces­sa­rily bad abut those major, only how many Kine­sio­lo­gists do we really need.

  4. mojo shiversNo Gravatar says:

    I agree. College ath­le­tes in the big-ticket sports should be trea­ted as semi-professionals and be com­pen­sa­ted for their ser­vi­ces. It makes more sense to pay them for their time if they aren’t recei­ving a com­pa­ra­ble edu­ca­tion as the rest of the stu­dents are recei­ving. Or I always thought, after their eli­gi­bi­lity is up, that these stu­dent ath­le­tes should be affor­ded a chance to recei­ved that degree when they the time to study and earn it. It does take a lot to fund a uni­ver­sity, but it doesn’t take so much that some of that money can’t go back into the stu­dents, all of the stu­dents, themselves.

    mojo shivers’s last blog post..And The Waves Crashing Around Me, The Sand Slips Out To Sea, And The Winds That Blow Remind Me, Of What Has Been, And What Can Never Be

  5. piaNo Gravatar says:

    Love your last para­graph – but not just for scien­ces. If we had some sys­tem of rewar­ding the “best” to teach.…

    pia’s last blog post..Reno­va­tion Court

  6. kaitNo Gravatar says:

    BC, does well but that is using the NCAA cri­te­ria not the govern­ment cri­te­ria, you’ve said it-before the Jesuits love their sports — they also love their edu­ca­tion. U of Mary­land doesn’t do bad either, or at least they used to do well, they all use 6 year grad rates though. The year I gra­dua­ted BC they boas­ted 16 NCAA teams with 100 per­cent grad rates. They have less going pro types though and like I said it is a 6 year grad rate.

    It’s what the mar­ket will bear and what will bring in the money.

    kait’s last blog post..Paul Smith

  7. BennetNo Gravatar says:

    The scien­tist face off is a good idea, but you’d have to dumb it up a bit. Women in biki­nis wal­king through hol­ding giant cue cards with ele­ments from the perio­dic chart.

    Enter­tain­ment news sucks, but I’m guilty of flip­ping through those trashy Star maga­zi­nes. I saw an image of Chris­tina Agui­lera, almost losing her flip-flop, and that is news worthy my friend.

    Bennet’s last blog post..I’ve got a 4 inch Iphone in my pants, aren’t you impressed?

  8. This remin­ded me of James Thurber’s “I Went to Sulli­vant” which desc­ri­bes the base­ball team in his gram­mar school. Some of the pla­yers were rumo­red to be out of their teens already but could never get past fourth grade. The uni­ver­sity teams were afraid to play them.

    I’m pla­ying rec­rea­tio­nal soft­ball each week and vowed to play an inte­llec­tual game, because with my brawn, that will be the best I can hope for.

  9. ChrisNo Gravatar says:

    Duke all the way. They gra­duate and win championships.

    Chris’s last blog post..Delu­sion is the First Sign of Desperation

    • cooperNo Gravatar says:

      I’m not fond of Duke but they have a slightly bet­ter record in that regard than some — for sure. I am not sure if they gra­duate them smart though.

  10. caseyNo Gravatar says:

    You let the air out of my balloon again.

    I’m a fan boy off college sports, but you’re right,it stinks that some of the pla­yers are not get­ting what they think, and you’re also right saying some of them don’t care. When you get to some of the large schools, where their gra­dua­tion rates are so pathe­tic clearly sho­wing the pla­yers aren’t stu­dents it does seem stu­pid to pre­tend. It makes you appre­ciate those schools where they are really stu­dents and where some of the money is spread around to other departments.

    casey’s last blog post..Wee­kend Update

  11. LeighNo Gravatar says:

    Sorry I for­got what I was going to com­ment… my TV wife (Sarah Shahi) just came on and dis­trac­ted me. I guess that’s what hap­pens when you are des­pe­ra­tely loo­king for a dis­trac­tion… not to men­tion the few glas­ses of wine i had this evening.

    Leigh’s last blog post..Get­ting Drop­ped on Facebook

  12. johnmNo Gravatar says:

    Given the stats I won’t feel at all guilty watching Villa­nova square off against Duke this evening.

    I think there is much room for impro­ve­ment if they want to try to con­vince us most of these ath­le­tes are stu­dents, that or they shouldn’t try to con­vince us.

    johnm’s last blog post..Piece of Land and Peace