Bearing False Witness, The Abstinence Only Lobby

I apo­lo­gize, to myself for the most part, for not being timely on this. I lost my head on my wor­king vaca­tion, was­ting my free time ens­con­ced in Middle English prose, and it slip­ped my mind.

The hole in the head gang, other­wise known as the Natio­nal Abs­ti­nence Edu­ca­tion Asso­cia­tion, lob­bied Con­gress today to encou­rage con­ti­nua­tion of fun­ding for “Abs­ti­nence Only” pro­grams. With Obama cut­ting pro­grams they wan­ted to be sure to push for con­ti­nua­tion of one of the most pro­ven inef­fec­tive, was­te­ful exam­ples of ways to spend your money. And, oh my god, they were expec­ting 500 tee­na­gers to attend the lobby, pro­ving, they say, that tee­na­gers really sup­port this thing. Saying 500 poten­tial tee­na­gers at a lobby pro­ves tee­na­gers sup­port this thing is about as erro­neous as much of the infor­ma­tion taught in these pro­grams. Last time I chec­ked there were about 30 to 40 million tee­na­gers in this country right? Their inter­pre­ta­tion tech­ni­que is cer­tainly crea­tive, I’ll give them that.

Millions of your dollars have gone to these pro­grams, with little to sug­gest they do anything but harm. The teen birth rate is up 3 per­cent natio­nally, the first time in 15 years that we have seen any inc­rease, and in some sta­tes it is up much higher, with highest teen birth rates in the South and South­west. One in four tee­nage girls is infec­ted with an STD. Much of the empi­ri­cal evi­dence out there sug­gests a com­prehen­sive approach to sex edu­ca­tion works best and offers the best chan­ces of pre­ven­tion of both preg­nancy and disease. Not to men­tion abs­ti­nence only seems to do even more harm to the ever vul­ne­ra­ble — the less edu­ca­ted and those on the lower tiers of the socioe­co­no­mic ladder.

Another cog in their wheel of decep­tion, this group in par­ti­cu­lar, to fire up the anti-abortion crowd, likes to label the peo­ple who oppose “abs­ti­nence only” the “pro-abortion peo­ple”. You see it cons­tantly in their rhe­to­ric, yet if you look around on the web you will notice the inc­rea­sing trend of pro-life peo­ple screa­ming out against abs­ti­nence only edu­ca­tion. They are also pretty fond of slut sha­ming, and bla­ming the inc­rease in tee­nage preg­nancy on movies like Juno.

So, if you don’t mind, in your free time, get on the phone or com­pu­ter and let your legis­la­tors know that this has to end. Unless you have some insi­dious sense of natio­nal pride about the fact we have one of the highest rates of tee­nage births and STI’s in the industrialized/ tech­no­lo­gi­zed world.

To make it easier I’ll do all the grunt work, here ya go.

Explo­ra­tory links:
Just a sam­ple of some crazy pis­sed of ran­tings out of Texas, though you have to unders­tand Texas have been suf­fe­ring for much lon­ger because Bush ins­ti­tu­ted this use­less pro­gram there long before he got to us.
Buzz: Sex Ed in Texas Gets an “F“
—–
Accu­racy, Effi­cacy And Ethics Of Abstinence-only Pro­grams Ques­tio­ned By Public Health Experts
Com­prehen­sive Sex Edu­ca­tion: What are the argu­ments? What is the evi­dence?
Abstinence-Only Ed Sez, “You can’t rape a slut!”
Abstinence-Only a Fai­lure, Latest Research Shows
US clergy call for an end to abstinence-only sex edu­ca­tion
Peace
I so want to say “of my ass”, but I’m way to old for such an exhi­bit of immaturity.

Share This
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • SphereIt
  • Mixx
  • FriendFeed

17 Comments

  • Thanks for remin­ding me of this. Ala­bama has an appa­lling sex edu­ca­tion pro­gram that is full of misin­for­ma­tion. Essen­tially they are telling kids that con­doms do not dec­rease the risk of any STD but HIV. They back this claim up with an NIH study done in 2001. What they fail to say is that the CDC held a workshop to eva­luate the NIH study and relea­sed a report not only detai­ling the down­falls of epi­de­mio­lo­gi­cal stu­dies, but sta­ted that in a lab envi­ron­ment it is phy­si­cally impos­si­ble for those viru­ses to pass through a latex barrier. Conc­lu­ding that con­doms, used correctly, are inc­re­dibly effec­tive in redu­cing STDs. Yep, the kids never hear about that part…

    belle’s last blog post..As if we need an excuse to buy shoes…

    • I really don’t think anyone cares about sex edu­ca­tion or the disea­ses rela­ted to it any­more. Why do you have to pay for school pro­grams any­way just make them part of a curriculum.

  • I haven’t been up on news – nothing pene­tra­tes my rapidly aging brain because of the audit and moving howe­ver:
    yes­ter­day Bris­tol Palin announ­ced (or her mother’s reps did) that she and Levi broke up.

    If her edu­ca­tion had inc­lu­ded sex ed she might have made another choice

    Belle is abso­lu­tely right about con­doms. For those of us who lived through the AiDS epi­de­mic when it was a death sen­tence and the sick­ness itself was more than horror, con­doms are a necessity.

    it’s com­mon sense that if con­doms reduce HIV they will reduce other STD’s. Actually we tell the kids in our lives to use them and we do supply them not because we fear HIV but everything else

    I have been thin­king about bla­ming Juno which did nothing to make tee­nage preg­nancy cool. per­so­nally I wish she had thought lon­ger about having the fetus abor­ted than moving straight to the adop­tion angle and I am adop­ted but it was a movie

    That her father and step mother were accep­ting – well they did say to each other they wished it were something easy like heavy drugs. While that was very funny it wasn’t a joke

    I think Juno should be requi­red vie­wing in every tenth grade class as it brings up many issues. If sol­ved sort of easily, again it was a movie but it left me still thin­king months after seeing it as I could relate from almost all angles

    pia’s last blog post..Wacky Wed­nes­day weird­ness – blame it on the full moon….

    • I have a rea­der full of things which flit past me at ligh­te­ning speed daily. I just hap­pe­ned to catch this one.

  • You know this state still accepts the fun­ding so a lot of schools still teach abs­ti­nence only, and the preg­nancy rate has inc­rea­sed for the first time in some time, the schools follow the extra penny here.

    jacob’s last blog post..Tiger or Sergio

    • That is what hap­pe­ned in this county but they are not teaching it any­more, again. It is all about the money that went along with it.

  • Ah, I don’t mind. I still remem­ber catho­lic school­girls fondly.

    Doug’s last blog post..Detec­tive

  • Middle English —->slightly more doa­ble than Old English. ;)

    What is it that these peo­ple don’t unders­tand about this not working?

    g’s last blog post..The Daily Grind

    • They unders­tand all right.

      Well, we could talk for hours about Old English vs Middle English, but hope­fully we won’t.

  • what ever hap­pe­ned to Parents edu­ca­ting their chil­dren…
    it seems to me that the crea­tors of these pro­grams have very little sense and much less inte­lli­gence :0
    have a good wee­kend Cooper…

    laketrees’s last blog post..The Spi­rit of the Bush

  • I’m sur­pri­sed anyone is still giving them the time of day.

  • “The hole in the head gang” — bless you my child.

    Like loo­king at Juno would make anyone wanna get pregnant.

    casey’s last blog post..Power Yes, Da Bomb No

    • “Like loo­king at Juno would make anyone wanna get preg­nant.“
      She cer­tainly loo­ked uncom­for­ta­ble throughout.

  • I almost married a for­mer Catho­lic school girl.

    She didn’t believe in abs­ti­nence, either. And the horror to think that she’s never been divorced!

    sauerkraut’s last blog post..Little girl sells Girl Scout Coo­kies online, gets in trou­ble with GSA