I Guess That’s Why They Call it the Blues

While Democ­rats sweat it out in their kha­kis and jeans, hoping all those newly min­ted young voters actually show up at the polls this fall, a new gene­ra­tion of freshly sui­ted Repu­bli­cans sit patiently on the side­li­nes wai­ting for the old guard to leave so they can take over, and shape a party more to their liking.

These little Rea­gan lovers, for­get­ting I guess that Rea­gan was put into office by Holly­wood and the mob, just can’t wait to bring things back to what it was back in the day, even though they can’t really remem­ber the day, but they’ve heard about it. Can’t wait for the day when they will not be tal­ked down to and dis­coun­ted. Besi­des that McCain and this party are just not tech­no­lo­gi­cally savvy enough, and McCain is an old fogey, or at least his web­site it.

Young Repu­bli­cans, Blue About the Pros­pects Ahead

I loved that article, it made me laugh for the first time today.

Don’t wish it away
Don’t look at it like it’s fore­ver
Bet­ween you and me
I could honestly say
That things can only get better

and I guess that’s why they call it the blues

ah a trend once writ­ten about as women going back to the home and hearth is really nothing more than a fact of eco­no­mic times. .…“oops we goo­fed”, they say. We assu­med it was because women deci­ded they wan­ted to be home with their chil­dren, stan­ding by their man.

What are we gonna do with all though Phy­llis Sch­lafly books now?

In case you didn’t hear, it is THE JALEPENO’s FAULT.

This has been a mere lovely links edition.

peace

Share This
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • SphereIt
  • Mixx
  • FriendFeed

10 Comments

  • And you remem­ber the Rea­gan era, Coop?

  • If those were the blue sta­tes we’d be billions of dollars more sol­vent as a country.

    It was humo­rous, even if it was sup­po­sed to be serious.

  • I read this last night but was too brain dead to com­ment. I still am.

    It did make me laugh. Wish there was an OTN Coo­per School of true snark. Or how not to be overly overtly sar­cas­tic. The Phy­llis Sch­laphy line, among others, is clas­sic Cooper.

    McCain says he has Cindy to unders­tand the Inter­net and I guess all new tech­no­logy for him. I don’t know much about her but she does look like a Bar­bie doll, and I have never heard her say anything inte­lli­gent so that’s scary. It’s scary that he doesn’t take the time to learn something so impor­tant to all of our lives – no mat­ter what our age

    • I know she does some kind of car racing, she is a bit of a dare devil and I don’t think she spends that much time around him usually. I heard her a cou­ple of times early on, she soun­ded much smar­ter than him really.

  • I like these little tid­bits from Aus­tin Walne, YR, 22: “Peo­ple that didn’t grow up under Jimmy Car­ter don’t remem­ber the stag­fla­tion of the ‘70s or the Iran stan­doff. Our job is to edu­cate them on the fai­led poli­cies of the past.”

    (A 22 yr. old edu­ca­ting us on Car­ter — while igno­ring Nixon, Ford, Rea­gan, Bush I and II. Car­ter didn’t (and couldn’t) get anything done. Car­ter spent the last year on a hos­tage cri­sis in Iran because we prop­ped up the Shah in the 1950’s. (And Nightline’s birth told us plenty…) “Stag­fla­tion” star­ted under Ford. Nixon took us off the gold stan­dard and froze prices/wages to get ree­lec­ted in 1972, assis­ting Ford in the finan­cial wrec­king of Ame­rica. Nixon had “Rea­gan Democ­rats” before Rea­gan did — carr­ying the South.)

    Com­pas­sion Con­ser­va­tive: One who takes away your aid, but tells you, “it’s for the best.” Then takes (your taxes), because, hey, you paid, and gives tax breaks to the wealthy or a new pro­gram to a defense con­trac­tor or a pet pro­ject that will go nowhere.

    Taxes on the uber­wealthy in the 1940’s were in the realm of 70% for anyone making over $100,000. (500,000 in current cash.) As they gra­dually came down from the peaks, the defi­cit we began to run, grew. Rea­gan star­ted his “no tax, but spend” phi­lo­sophy right out the gate.
    Cut social “safety net” pro­grams, inc­rea­sed mil. spen­ding to “put pres­sure on the USSR” that was all ready going broke itself. Mar­gi­nal tax rates for peo­ple making under $20,000 grew sig­ni­fi­cantly, while the money peo­ple got their taxes back. Supply-siders jus­ti­fied it as “trickle-down” effect.

    The stock mar­ket, and those eager bea­ver, no-tax paying, bro­kers had a party in the 1980’s. Dere­gu­la­tion, what little regs. remai­ned, has only made a moc­kery out of OSHA, EPA and other alpha­bet soup orgs. Com­pa­nies didn’t care — and made bank on it.

    (I just had to write this…)

  • Late on this, but thanks for the laugh.

  • Knew it wasn’t the toma­toes — and not just because they’re red.