cooper culture
Image 01

Am I Not Human

April 27th, 2008 by cooper

Once a month, on the 27th, a cam­paign to remind us we are not alone.

A cam­paign, small at this time but sure to grow, in which a sim­ple ques­tion is asked.

AM I NOT HUMAN

We can sit by an ratio­na­lize on how the Olym­pic games are about ath­le­tes, sports­manship, and coming together. We can try to con­vince our­sel­ves The Olym­pics, and where they are being held, have nothing to do with the the plight of those who are being obli­te­ra­ted by their own government.

Or we can think, and post, about those who are rarely trea­ted as, and some­ti­mes not even seen as, human.

We can admit, that by igno­ring the huma­ni­ta­rian plights, (in the face of such as Dar­fur it is immo­ral to do so), loo­king other way while the host of the Olym­pics con­si­ders it’s rela­tionship with Khar­toum, it’s finan­cial invest­ment in Sudan’s oil and the selling of arms to Khar­toum to to be eco­no­mics, and no vio­la­tion of human rights, we are complicit.

We also have to remem­ber that the Uni­ted sta­tes is the lar­gest arms expor­ter in the world, true we have more arms manu­fac­tu­rers, so that must be taken into account, yet accor­ding to the latest data acces­si­ble to yours truly…

Lar­gest Impor­ters:
Greece
South Korea
China
India
UAE
Poland
Tur­key
Israel
Vene­zuela
South Africa
Pakistan

Lar­gest Suppliers:

USA
Rus­sia
Ger­many
France
Nether­lands
UK
Italy
Spain
Swe­den
China

Accor­ding to The World Secu­rity Institute,

“the Uni­ted Sta­tes is sen­ding unpre­ce­den­ted levels of mili­tary assis­tance to coun­tries that it simul­ta­neously cri­ti­ci­zes for lack of res­pect for human rights and, in some cases, for ques­tio­na­ble democ­ra­tic pro­ces­ses. As a foreign policy, this is con­fu­sing, short-sighted and poten­tially very dan­ge­rous. Once wea­pons are deli­ve­red to a country, it beco­mes inc­rea­singly dif­fi­cult to con­trol how they are used, and pre­vent them from being illi­citly diver­ted anywhere in the world. While these coun­tries are currently con­si­de­red impor­tant to U.S. efforts in the “war on terror” now, poli­ti­cal and mili­tary ins­ta­bi­lity makes their con­ti­nued alle­giance to the Uni­ted Sta­tes ques­tio­na­ble. Arming such coun­tries to the hilt with top-of-the-line U.S. wea­ponry could allow them to tar­get the Uni­ted Sta­tes, or its allies or to allow the wea­pons to fall in the hands of ene­mies of the Uni­ted Sta­tes. Selling arms for short-term poli­ti­cal gains under­mi­nes long-term U.S natio­nal secu­rity and stra­te­gic interests. “

By selling arms to coun­tries who then sell to coun­tries which obli­te­rate their own, we are no bet­ter than those who sell directly to those countries.

What kind of game do we play when we spend billions on huma­ni­ta­rian aid yet to not push with all our poli­ti­cal might for the trac­king and pro­se­cu­tion of those who com­mit­ted cri­mes against huma­nity in Darfur?

A losing game.
cross­pos­ted at Darfur:An Unfor­gi­va­ble Hell on Earth

A com­ment disa­bled post

Share This
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • FriendFeed
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks

Tags: , ,

Comments are closed.