cooper culture
Image 01

Dear Great, Great Uncle Ralphie.

February 24th, 2008 by cooper

Ralph Nader, like the child who doesn’t want to play hide and seek yet never hesi­ta­tes to go around telling Sammy where Mary is hiding. Like that child, he is chan­ging the rules of the game while not really being affec­ted by the results. Like that child, Ralph, quite aware what he does could be at the expense of a nation, has jum­ped in to the bur­ning ring of fire.

His time is over. Not exactly irre­le­vant, he is like a tick on my dogs tail, he has to be addres­sed for the harm he could do even though the like­lihood of real harm is pretty slim. It’s like he hasn’t noti­ced the peo­ple are sho­wing up again, deman­ding real ans­wers for them­sel­ves. The peo­ple no lon­ger need Ralph Nader. We can thank Pre­si­dent Bush for that.

I give him cre­dit, at least he didn’t do what most of the gene­ra­tion of LSD and pro­test marches, and the end of the gene­ra­tion before them did,“Turn on, tune in, drop out”. I thank him for not follo­wing in the foots­teps of his his con­tem­po­ra­ries. I thank him for not giving it up when things got rough, when things didn’t turn out like ever­yone thought they should after the pro­tests against the war, the marches against racism, and the essays on cor­po­ra­tism — long before it was called cor­po­ra­tism. When all that did not bring imme­diate suc­cess or change in policy, they all quit, hea­ded to the hills, some even­tually became part of the pro­blem. Ralph Nader didn’t, and I thank him for that.

We can take over from here though. My gene­ra­tion will not give up so easily, are not as likely to head for the hills.We are bet­ter equip­ped with a large body of know­ledge at our fin­ger­tips – so what if most of it comes off the inter­net — at least thirty per­cent of it is accurate.

Great Great Uncle Ralphie.…please !! We can handle this.

—-
The rest, without attemp­ted saga­cious­ness, is just for fun.

For those who have totally mes­sed up their life with their online pre­sence, and I know some of you have, I’ve seen your FB and My Space pages, there is a solu­tion. The Repu­ta­tion Defen­der.


And for you there who want to let someone know, though you know love is all you need, you gave them something else, Jeze­bel points out a site where you can send an anony­mous card to your lovers to let them know you might have given them an STD. in Spot.


A quic­kie sto­len from Think Pro­gress, which I hate to men­tion here as it might cause the more con­ser­va­tive of you to head for the blog­ging hills, but there ya go, like you didn’t already guess what “left of most lines” meant, even if you’ve never really read any of my posts com­ple­tely I think you pro­bably got the gene­ral idea.

Peace

Share This
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • FriendFeed
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks

Tags: , ,

29 Responses to “Dear Great, Great Uncle Ralphie.”

  1. johnmNo Gravatar says:

    Exactly. I couldn’t have said it bet­ter myself, even to myself.

    The links could be help­ful too, for a friend or two, not me of course.

    Video — hila­rious.

    I don’t get around much.

  2. the amoebaNo Gravatar says:

    My gene­ra­tion will not give up so easily, are not as likely to head for the hills.

    Ah, coo­per … that’s what we said. [I use “we” loo­sely … in those days, I pro­fes­sed to be right of cen­ter. Which con­ti­nued until I finally figu­red out what that’all meant. Sigh.]

    Until, like Abbie Hoff­man, “we” dis­co­ve­red money and power. As did Nader, in a dif­fe­rent way. He’s worth millions, though he claims that he never sees it. Life on the $25K per annum he says he lives on (accor­ding to Wiki­pe­dia) is a whole lot easier when you have a pile of peo­ple wor­king in the cor­po­ra­tions you’ve fun­ded pre­pa­red to do everything for you but wipe your tush.

    Obama is the new Ken­nedy, and your gene­ra­tion is about to live Came­lot II. McCain might somehow sur­vive Vicki, as Nixon sur­vi­ved Chec­kers, and put up some kind of a fight, but Nixon had the advan­tage of follo­wing after a repu­ta­ble, if con­ser­va­tive, Pre­si­dent — an advan­tage McCain lacks. I don’t see Obama win­ning in anything less than a lands­lide — with or without Hillary on the ticket.

    May you and your gene­ra­tion fare bet­ter with your Came­lot than we did with ours.

  3. joegNo Gravatar says:

    I really liked your pre­vious post, let­ter to your body, for speed’s sake I’ll say it here. Good for you.

    I didn’t live Came­lot. I came slightly after to this world. Quite a bit after really. Not sure if your gene­ra­tion will do bet­ter, are they all like you? Doubt it, hope so, but doubt it.

    We no lon­ger need Nader, if we ever did, but you’re right to thank him — he did more in his way than most though not much came of it if you exa­mine it. Mes­sed up a few things too, at least if you ask some people.

    I hope peo­ple are paying atten­tion now, but how long into an eco­no­mic reco­very will the las­si­tude return? Not before the elec­tion cer­tainly, I agree Obama will win, barring some unfor­seen affair with a covert ope­ra­tive from the Middle East. It’s the mor­ning after where we fail, maybe we can stay awake and be wary of the mor­ning after.

    I have hope, first time in a long time. That’s a good thing.

    But damn the mor­ning after is where we have to stay awake.

    I’ve been away so long I pro­bably could have writ­ten a book here.

    great uncle joe

  4. kaitNo Gravatar says:

    How old is he any­way? Older than John McCain?

    I love the woman in the bot­tom frame who doesn’t quite know what to say but who tries to dif­fuse the situa­tion somehow while trying not to laugh or cry.

  5. piaNo Gravatar says:

    Ralph Nader is directly res­pon­si­ble for the mess this country is in

    I’m a baby boo­mer so all I care about is that big pay out I will get after selling my apart­ment :) The one in the city that was a mess when I first moved into it – but because of my gene­ra­tion and ones above it now has wor­king sub­ways, schools sort of and more.

    My gene­ra­tion made inner cities liva­ble – we did a lot of things that we’re not cre­di­ted with

    I will ask why nobody ever talks about GenX or the one after it? Why aren’t they res­pon­si­ble for change?

    GenX came of age during peace time – after the reces­sion that began in 70 and ended in 82 – they would make fun of my gene­ra­tion while they were coke and ecs­tasy fue­led. Why were they exempt from making this a bet­ter country?

    Peo­ple who gra­dua­ted college in the 90’s wal­ked into great paying jobs, bought expen­sive apart­ments or homes. Now they’re com­plai­ning – and bla­ming everything on us. Sorry it doesn’t work that way. Every gene­ra­tion is res­pon­si­ble to make this a bet­ter country

    If I’m gene­ra­li­zing – my entire gene­ra­tion has been gene­ra­li­zed and I’m tired of it

    The chil­dren I didn’t have but my friends did are all Obama volun­teers along with their parents. Maybe we rai­sed spoi­led kids who actually give a damn – maybe they lear­ned it from us

    Ralph Nader is a true gene­ra­tion above baby boo­mers – that was “the silent gene­ra­tion” as were the gene­ra­tions beneath mine
    But nobody ever says “Gen X & Y should do more.” It’s always the baby boo­mers and has been since we were in our 20’s.

    Accor­ding to that blog I used to write for, all baby boo­mers wal­ked around with rocks in our poc­kets during Viet Nam so we could throw them at troops. Baby boo­mers are solely res­pon­si­ble for the state of the country Not true but who cares?

  6. sauerkrautNo Gravatar says:

    Ralph Nader is a fly on the pim­ple on my ass. The dog is not res­pon­si­ble for him.

    As Pia wrote, Ralph Nader put us into the funk of the last 8 years. Of, as joeg, wri­tes a han­go­ver that’s las­ted 8 years of mor­ning afters.

    Ralphie­boy was rele­vant at one point. Very rele­vant. Although I now think it would be very kewl to own a Cor­vair. But his ego-driven antics in 2000 are unfor­gi­vea­ble. He is the ego to Hillary’s id.

    Perhaps he could do us all a favor by dec­la­ring iron­pan­tsuit unsafe at any speed.

    OC? Hillary on Obama’s tic­ket? Hush, man. That’s blaspheme.

  7. GNo Gravatar says:

    I agree with ever­yone, not much for argu­ment I can see all points. My parents became law­yers, one cor­po­rate one civil rights…I’m “Caught in the middle with you”.

    I think all gene­ra­tions can take over now, finally.

    What did hap­pen after the six­ties?
    The gen before the boo­mers sat around in shock and the boo­mers moved on. Very few sta­yed in that peace, love and unders­tan­ding mode when pro­fit came their way. Those who talk most should at least be able to finish their speech, they didn’t finish it, that is why peo­ple blame them.

  8. Jason P.No Gravatar says:

    Yeah, I really can’t be too happy with Nader.

    Look at the timing:
    NYT puts out the story about McCain and within a week, Nader is put­ting his hat into the ring.

    The Con­ser­va­ti­ves may rally around McCain because of that wac­ked way of pre­sen­ting “facts.” AND Nader can be just enough of an upset­ter to get votes away from Obama…

    (As Hillary is back to “trying to fight” — instead of just accep­ting the defeat humanly, and pos­sibly, get­ting a VP shot.)

    It should be fun…

  9. JasonNo Gravatar says:

    Actually, your gene­ra­tion gives up any­time there’s a new trend — or there’s a neato gad­get to be owned. Why give up when odds are it’s just as easy to buy off a whole gene­ra­tion that’s lived its entire exis­tance as nothing more than a string of pop cul­ture fan­cies crea­ted by viral mar­ke­ting gurus?

    Lol, chica, guess I’m just way too cyni­cal these days about the fate of our nation. Get­ting old and crotchety.

  10. cooperNo Gravatar says:

    john: You get around more than I do these days.

    amoeba: thanks you I hope we fare bet­ter too.

    joe: hope is good b ut wht hap­pens when it doesn’t work out? Do you just say fuck it?

    kait: Fairly old though he doesn’t look that bad for his age.

    pia: Someone shuld have gien gen x something to do.

    Oh,pia I care.

    sk: you exhaust me.

    g: you have a point in that ever­yone has a point.

    Jason P: I don’t watch any of it any­more though I will watch the deba­tes and did last week. I’ve allo­ca­ted my free time to “The Wire” ins­tead of to pun­dit news.

    Jason zp: Yea well I guess you my be han­ging around the wrong pie­ces of my gene­ra­tion, though I won’t argue their are plenty of them like that there are more of the others yet the world con­cen­tra­tes on the cul­tu­res cliquers.

  11. mojo shiversNo Gravatar says:

    I didn’t even know I had a online repu­ta­tion to defend. Hmmm.

  12. I was about to write something along these lines actually. But then again Hillary is pro­vi­ding plenty of fuel, so I’ll be ok.

    As for our gene­ra­tion… you do not accu­ra­tely repre­sent it. I would like to say that I don’t either, nor do the peo­ple that we gene­rally asso­ciate with. There may be hope for us, but really what we ought to be saying is that we will be noto­rious and relent­less in our refu­sal to give up and that there will be others who follow the example

  13. laketreesNo Gravatar says:

    inte­res­ting links Coo­per …
    just learnt that Turn on, tune in, drop out came about because someone wan­ted something snappy to pro­mote the bene­fits of LSD.… :)
    .…do peo­ple really pay to have their repu­ta­tions defended ??

  14. Hi Coo­per,

    The video is pri­ce­less … I don’t think he could have plan­ned the follow up to his point any bet­ter than the insi­pid bit of Vegas-like infotainment.

    As to Nader, he doesn’t unders­tand that the very folks that the Green Party was appea­ling to back in 2000 are now being brought into the pro­cess by Obama again, so he is com­ple­tely irre­le­vant. Plus he has no party or move­ment behind him … just a waning cult of personality.

    I’m begin­ning to see some really nasty hate-speech floa­ting around the right wing pro­pa­ganda machine regar­ding Obama, and we could be in for a really ugly campaign.

  15. Jason P.No Gravatar says:

    Do you mean –http://www.thewire.co.uk/ or http://www.the-wire.com/ or the TV show “The Wire”. I assume nothing.

    Pun­dits and wonks have their uses, like men. ;)

    Deba­tes are gene­rally what i watch.

    Anywho, just count the days until someone else is saying, “I do solemnly swear…”

  16. caseyNo Gravatar says:

    I don’t know much about Nader, I saw a clip of him last night on some show and really I couldn’t make sense of half of what he was saying.

    That video was priceless.

    Those other links are inte­res­ting — Repu­ta­tion Defender????

    inks­pot not a bad idea, but I can see all sorts of peo­ple yuc­king around with it.

  17. cooperNo Gravatar says:

    mojo: I’m glad you know now.

    EW: Maybe it’s wish­ful thin­king but I have hope for our gene­ra­tion. I see more and more huma­ni­ta­rian and civic action from peo­ple my age daily, and I also see them researching the issues.

    lake­trees: I don’t know I haven’t had cause to check it out .….yet. ;)

    Fran­cis: You are right, Nader is mis­sing that very point, which means he dis­re­gards their pov or doesn’t know about it — neither makes him look good.

    Glad yuo enjo­yed the video.

    JasonP: The Wire — HBO usa

    casey: I could see it being a yuc­ker for sure.

  18. Hi Coo­per,
    Me again … I’ve just tag­ged you with a meme. If you have some free time to spend on it (I know you’re busy), it might be worth a look. Details are here.

  19. DougNo Gravatar says:

    Nader might make Sena­tor Obama a bet­ter can­di­date. I would feel a lot bet­ter if something would.

  20. the amoebaNo Gravatar says:

    But, Doug, Obama’s a great can­di­date! Look at all these young peo­ple follo­wing him around.

    er, what was that about a flute pla­yer in motley …?

    ;)

  21. hi coo­per,

    i’m glad you lean to the left. at the risk of get­ting toma­toes (or worse) thrown at me, i will ven­ture to say that the peo­ple i know on the right are more apt to say “don’t bother me with other sour­ces. i know where i stand.”

    i once pla­ced to the left of the Dalai Lama on a per­so­na­lity test which, though i take it only half seriously, i’m sure holds some truth.

    i’m lin­king to you. thanks for having the cou­rage to make poli­ti­cal statements!

  22. YobachiNo Gravatar says:

    Ralph Nader is an ego maniac.

  23. cooperNo Gravatar says:

    Doug:

    Well you will have two choi­ces from the main menu, but then there is that sub menu, and of course the “write in” .
    I say knock your­self out.

    amoeba: You have the same menu options as Doug, we all do. To assume mine are any less thought out because I’m twenty two is quite frankly insulting.

    Obvious to anyone is the fact that all poli­ti­cal can­di­da­tes want to get elec­ted, most would do anything to do so, some may appear pied piper-ish, which indeed would frigh­ten those of you who lived through all that…yet most peo­ple I know do not get their infor­ma­tion via tele­vi­sion, they know where to go to look up senate record, state senate records, which lobbyist’s work for which can­di­date currently, who exactly con­tri­bu­tes to the campaigns,…and on and on.

    Most peo­ple are loo­king beyond the words.

    lydia: I believe I am in that Dali Lama cor­ner as well, if I remem­ber correctly. I’m coming your way as soon as I relax with a left lea­ning glass of tea and a salad.

    Yobachi: I think there is a touch of that, yes.

  24. the amoebaNo Gravatar says:

    Coo­per, you think care­fully, you’ve shown that throughout your pos­ting life here. I dare­say those in your imme­diate vici­nity think care­fully. Does that apply to ever­yone wea­ring an Obama but­ton? I wonder.

    After all, if we were truly lis­te­ning to what the world is telling us right now, there wouldn’t be a car on the roads.

  25. cooperNo Gravatar says:

    amoeba:
    As many as are thin­king about any other can­di­date so I guess it makes it even in some way.

    If there weren’t a car on the road I’m afraid most peo­ple would be without work making it hard to house and feed them­sel­ves. Again I hate to go back to the past but it could have been plan­ned much dif­fe­rently maybe even legis­la­ted, though we know peo­ple love small govern­ment. It’s not like they weren’t aware of this in the seven­ties, they were.

  26. zydeco fishNo Gravatar says:

    wow, you made me feel sorry for Ralphie.

  27. cooperNo Gravatar says:

    Zydeco: That’s unfortunate.

  28. Great post. Although I don’t really feel sorry for the Ralphie. In some sick way he’s con­nec­ted to why we’ve had nearly 8 years of Bush, although he wouldn’t admit it.

    I don’t think we have anything to worry about this year. I loved the point that Obama made about Nader — to paraph­rase — that Ralph is someone who feels if you don’t hold his exact views you’re not com­mit­ted enough.

    BTW — it’s great to be rea­ding your posts again.

  29. cooperNo Gravatar says:

    Spa­ce­monk: Where have you been? I hope you are pos­ting again.