cooper culture
Image 01

Acceptable Risk

December 28th, 2007 by cooper

The mur­der of Bhutto, a horri­ble tra­gedy which does not bode well for the area, or us as a mat­ter of fact, but surely not a total sur­prise to anyone. Bhutto knew of the dan­gers, almost reve­led in them or so it seems.

Three men at a zoo, in a country where peo­ple often mis­ta­kenly believe rules and regu­la­tions will keep them safe. Sur­prise, there are no real regu­la­tions, though six­teen and a half feet is the recom­men­ded height for enc­lo­su­res recom­men­ded by the Zoo asso­cia­tion, no one can really say how high a tiger can jump, and when an ani­mal esca­pes no one has to report it to the fede­ral agency which ins­pects zoos? Not to men­tion that the Tiger invol­ved in this attack, an attack which killed one man and seriously inju­red two more, mau­led a wor­ker last year unbek­nown to the zoo visi­tors, most who go in expec­ting that the zoo is a safe place, with vigi­lant
zoo­kee­pers, and pro­per security.

Zoo’s may be as safer than Pakis­tan, at least for­mer a Prime Minis­ter retur­ning to seek poli­ti­cal redemp­tion, but zoo’s in this country are not as safe as we might think.

While poli­ti­cal can­di­da­tes take advan­tage of this fact of Bhutto’s mur­der to plea their case, remem­ber we are not safe here, life is a gam­ble and there are no gua­ran­tees, but should the death of a for­mer Prime Minis­ter in an area his­to­ri­cally known for poli­ti­cal wars and assas­si­na­tions con­cern us any more than the deaths at a zoo?

And what of what unins­pec­ted trac­tor trai­lers with dri­vers run­ning on caf­feine, uppers, and one hour of sleep a day, hos­pi­tals per­for­ming sur­gery on the wrong side of your brain, the rising cost of health care, the subs­tan­dard edu­ca­tion, and the coo­pe­rate rip off taking place in New Orleans.

Bhutto took a risk, she was a risk taker. The risk was huge, but she was aware of it, as was the world.

The three men who were visi­ting the zoo on that day did not sign up for their risk.

postsc­ript:

Kind of a dead week in blog land. I’ve been busy with guests, and as for­tune would have it I left something in D.C. which I now much drive in to the city to reco­ver. Woe is me, my sche­du­led inter­net time for the week is shot to hell. Hope to be back later to catch up on my blog scrolling.

Share This
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • FriendFeed
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks

Tags: ,

19 Responses to “Acceptable Risk”

  1. BillyWarholNo Gravatar says:

    Yeah Ama­zing how the Media TV Chan­nels + the Vie­wing Public were con­su­med by that Tiger Zoo Story*

    sigh.…..

    Hope U had a Great Christ­mas Coop!

    Happy New Year + All the Best to U + yer Family + Friendz in 2008!

    Cheers! Billy ;)) xoxo

    Peace*

    p.s. It’s my New Year’s Reso­lu­tion to have less “Hummm” Blog Posts but I’m not even sure that will be possible*

    ;))

  2. o ceallaighNo Gravatar says:

    Well, zoo­kee­pers are con­ti­nually ama­zed that these things don’t hap­pen more often rather than less, given the pro­pen­sity for the cus­to­mers to pull stunts like jum­ping into the lion enc­lo­sure or thro­wing Jack in the Box ham­bur­gers at the gori­llas. Not to men­tion the per­pe­tual gap bet­ween income and expen­di­tu­res expe­rien­ced by most zoos. Besi­des, the zoos I’ve visi­ted have tried to inform their patrons of the risk. They could go to the extent of having those cus­to­mers sign a wai­ver (the idea has cros­sed their minds, often), but see “income”, supra. Yes, Pogo, you’ve heard this mes­sage before.

    I’m sure that the same peo­ple who think that 9/11 was an inside job will have a field day with the Bhutto assas­si­na­tion. Might could even be … Quilly just finished rea­ding A Thou­sand Splen­did Suns, about the for­ces of revo­lu­tion and counter-revolution in Afgha­nis­tan. The last para­graph speaks of a naming game prac­ti­ced by lead cha­rac­ter Laila, for her newly-conceived child. The book ends:

    “But the game invol­ves only male names. Because, if it’s a girl, Laila has already named her.”

    Need I say more.

    Happy New Year any­way, Cooper.

  3. CoyotemikeNo Gravatar says:

    I just saw something in the Bhutto case. She sent an email to CNN saying she would blame Musha­rraf if anything hap­pe­ned to her because he wouldn’t give her the secu­rity she asked for. She sent it in October.

    I thought this only hap­pe­ned in bad spy movies :(

    As for the tiger … I have mixed thoughts about zoos. I can see them as good for kee­ping some spe­cies from disap­pea­ring fore­ver, but caged wild ani­mals are still wild ani­mals and all of them have killing instincts.

    and on that note … Happy New Year!!!

  4. sauerkrautNo Gravatar says:

    When I first saw the tiger story on the news, I was ama­zed that a 350 lb tige could jump over a 20 foot moat on the way up’n’over a 18 foot fence.

    Then the height of the fence was redu­ced to 16′.

    Then it came out that the moat was a bit wider than ear­lier repor­ted but dry as a bone. Some good that does.

    Then the news chan­ged to “one of the 3 was taun­ting the tiger.” The inter­view with the father was pri­ce­less. To him, it mat­te­red not that his son may have taun­ted the tiger, only that the tiger should not have escaped.

    The incon­sis­tent sto­ries with the tiger was repea­ted during the cove­rage of Bena­zir Bhutto’s assas­si­na­tion. First one thing, then another, then yet another, back to an ear­lier thing now revi­sed, and so on. The shock of her being killed is mag­ni­fied when the news media can­not get the facts straigh­te­ned out prior to airing their sto­ries. When did these half-complete and half-assed sto­ries become accep­ta­ble ways of pre­sen­ting news stories?

    I feel tre­men­dously for the three chil­dren of Mrs. Bhutto. And a pox on those idiots who take the oppor­tu­nity to rehash the old rumors and innuendo about Mrs. Bhutto and her husband.

  5. piaNo Gravatar says:

    I spent the after­noon with my 17 year old kind of godchild – would be had she been bap­ti­zed. She didn’t even know about Bhutto or who she was. That was the truly sad thing to me

    Though I agree with her that Ame­rica is no lon­ger a democ­racy I found it heart­brea­king that she has no desire to help change the USA, but will spend win­ter break in Costa Rica wor­king on an eco­lo­gi­cal mis­sion – I totally agree with that but to just assume that Ame­rica is going to further slide and not try to help fix it, I don’t know about that
    She didn’t know about the tiger either and of course felt more for it than for the peo­ple
    I just found this all inc­re­dibly sad

  6. mojo shiversNo Gravatar says:

    You make an inte­res­ting point about tigers and Bhutto. I guess that’s why they make a dis­tinc­tion bet­ween inno­cent bys­tan­ders and willing par­ti­ci­pants because there is always a risk in put­ting your face, your name, and your repu­ta­tion out there.

  7. jacobNo Gravatar says:

    Great points coo­per. It’s not like Pakis­tan wasn’t a hot bed any­way, and the way we mes­sed up in Afghanistan…

    The woman knew the score. The result won’t be plea­sant, but this isn’t a surprise’s but it’s great fro some pre­si­den­tial can­di­da­tes because Ame­ri­cans are so gullible.

    The tiger thing though, that had to come as a sur­prise to those there. Why not just make the fen­ces high enough? A hun­dred feet should do.

    I’ve mis­sed it here, trying to catch up. Star­ting at the top.

    Happy New Year as well.

  8. laketreesNo Gravatar says:

    both sto­ries are sad.. Coo­per !
    and always there is the question…“if only“
    here in Aus­tra­lia we heard news of a nine month old baby being mau­led to death by the family pet dog.…
    I have no ans­wers for these tra­ge­dies.… it just shows that we as inte­lli­gent human beings can make huge errors in our jud­ge­ments and decisions…and often others pay the ulti­mate price…because of those human errors…

    a pea­ce­ful and happy New Year to you .….

  9. DougNo Gravatar says:

    Nice job put­ting Pakis­tan and the San Fran­cisco zoo together. I wouldn’t have thought of that. Wel­come to the Mon­key House.

  10. cooperNo Gravatar says:

    Billy: Cheers to you as well Billy and Happy New Year. Don’t drink and drive.

    OC: A fence or enc­lo­sure should at least be expec­ted to be the height sug­ges­ted by the asso­cia­tion to which zoo’s belong or why even have a sug­ges­ted height. Lordy.

    I read a “A Thou­sand Splen­did Suns” and you need not say more.

    Happy New Year to you, suf­fe­ring as you are in that climate.

    Coyote: Happy New Year. I’m sure we’ll here something every day such as ” nope it was defi­ni­tely a bullet which killed her” „,

    SK: The fence was less than thir­teen feet high, the moat was dry, there was no food around so they weren’t taun­ting it with food.

    I ima­gine if you are taun­ting an ani­mal in what is basi­cally a cage in a zoo you still shouldn’t expect the ani­mal to be able to jump out no mat­ter how stu­pid the taun­ting is.

    I can’t honestly say I feel a whole lot about Bhutto, her­self or her family, why would I feel any­more than I do for a stran­ger down the street . The situa­tion is alar­ming and sad
    and scary though.

    Pia: You know though, it’s kind of like Oprah who found it too hard or too unap­pea­ling to try to help kids here with a school. It’s har­der and more com­pli­ca­ted to help here.

    MOJO: exactly

    jacob: I have no idea but as that tiger had
    mau­led someone before even if it was taun­ted it surely should have been obser­ved more carefully.

    Kim: same to you and yes it’s all very sad.

    Doug: The mon­key house is where I belong.

  11. protagorasNo Gravatar says:

    C–

    *jumps into tiger cage for protection*

  12. protagorasNo Gravatar says:

    C–

    *jumps into tiger cage for protection*

    ;)

  13. MarvalusNo Gravatar says:

    Exce­llent, exce­llent points, Coop…no need to say more…

    Happy New Year!

  14. Miz BoheMiaNo Gravatar says:

    We’ve been to that zoo… it’s the “in” thing for kids here as the kid’s zoo is great… and the tigers are not too far.

    That same tiger, Tatiana, mau­led its kee­per last year. My close girlfriend/honorary god­mother of my chil­dren was there with her two girls and they saw it all and they were trau­ma­ti­zed beyond words and nee­ded coun­se­ling and now it’s hap­pe­ned again, only worse, the damn tiger was out and for a while they thought all 4 tigers were out. The incom­pe­tency of the zoo has come to light in a major way and I, for one, do not plan on retur­ning. One death was tra­gic, it should never had hap­pend but my god what if there had been kids around? This has been huge and heart­brea­king and shoc­king and terrif­ying and anger-inducing news here in SF and I am not the only one who plans to boy­cott the zoo. SF is NOT the place to be killed by a damn tiger!

    As for Bena­zir Bhutto, the tra­gedy of it all lea­ves me speech­less but not at all surprised.

    Have a safe drive back to DC…

  15. Miz BoheMiaNo Gravatar says:

    And as a side­note with regards to the zoo, I would have no pro­blems with it being shut down as I am not one to sup­port zoos to begin with. The cou­ple of times I have gone has entai­led my swa­llo­wing my views for the sake of the kids though we have used it as a plat­form for ani­mal rights and how inef­fi­cient zoo setups are for the ani­mals and their true wel­fare and what their “true wel­fare” entails. Wild­life sanc­tua­ries? Now they have my full blessing…

  16. ColinNo Gravatar says:

    I too,am amberdextrous.I always thought that it meant the abi­lity to use both arms equally well.I can pitch a base­ball with both arms.I wasn’t aware it had anything to do with handw­ri­ting but what do I know,I’m a grade nine dropout.

  17. cooperNo Gravatar says:

    pro­ta­go­ras: Show yourself.

    Mar­va­lus: Happy New Year to you as well.

    Mizzy B: Oh to see you alive and I assume breathing is a treat. Yes funny how I hear very little about that part.

    I actually dis­like zoo’s and those tra­ve­ling ani­mal car­ni­vals make me sick. We will all be in cages one day.

    Hugs Mizzy B.

    Colin: ?

  18. weirsdoNo Gravatar says:

    It is not that one life is neces­sa­rily more valua­ble than another (I don’t believe all are equally valua­ble, but also don’t believe I can judge which are), but that Bhutto’s death may have a much wider impact than that of the man at the zoo.

  19. cooperNo Gravatar says:

    weirsdo: World­wide it will have grea­ter impact, but here in this country where most peo­ple couldn’t find Pakis­tan on a map it won’t.