Going to the Chapel and I’m Gonna Get.…Vacuumed?

Looks like some of us will be marr­ying robots some day. I wan­ted to share my inef­fa­ble exci­te­ment with you, in the wee hours of the morning.

I’m naming mine Dorian (Grey).

My disease free Dorian won’t have to worry about that pesky aging thing either. Oh to be satia­ted by a robot, just let me bask a moment my sanguinity.

I do hope that Dorian does a bet­ter job of suc­king up than my Roomba does at suc­king dirt off my floor. Even though it’s likely Dorian will end up just like the Roomba, used only for enter­tain­ment pur­po­ses, I’m pla­cing my order now.

There could be pro­blems of course. I could end up with a demo­nic robot, worse yet a slat­ternly one. Rumor has it that robot fune­rals are cheap though so it really won’t mat­ter. This will be one spouse I can legally bury in my back yard.

This won’t be enti­rely new to me. I’ve dated a robot before; his name was .… I for­get. There is no doubt in my mind he was a robot though. That was my last foray into peo­ple who know my brother and go to the school of busi­ness. I’m hoping they craft my Dorian bet­ter than that.

Is there really a Uni­ver­sity in Maastricht?

Share This
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • SphereIt
  • Mixx
  • FriendFeed

19 Comments

  • The pos­si­bi­li­ties are end­less. I don’t know if it fas­ci­na­tes or appalls me, to meet my neigh­bors and not know if they are robots or not. Would the guy say “this is my wife susie — shes a robot? What if my robot pre­fe­rred the robot married to the woman next door?

  • 3:30 am. robots. hmmm…

    In future years, peo­ple will hope­fully spend less time in a vacuum and more in rea­lity. The hell with the robots, too.

  • Robots have a lot of poten­tial. Volume con­trol will make the dif­fe­rence bet­ween my marr­ying a robot or just dating around.

  • Can’t say that I would come out against robot mates. A robot maid makes more sense. It doesn’t look like anyone will be living clo­ser to rea­lity in the future. Ever­yone con­ti­nues to ease away from the rea­lity line.

    Is real life so unplea­sant? Are real peo­ple like­wise so?

  • I wouldn’t want a robot you couldn’t argue with.…then you couldn’t make up

  • Coo­per, do i sense a recent inc­rease in per­cen­tage of sex rela­ted issues on your blog? Any­way, when you order your Dorian could you do me a favor and please kindly see if there are also some nany­bots to help me improve my paren­ting ser­vi­ces and, oh, see if there are some Geisha­bots for me. Perhaps my wife won’t object if I tell her you get one too.

  • Coo­per, do i sense a recent inc­rease in per­cen­tage of sex rela­ted issues on your blog? Any­way, when you order your Dorian could you do me a favor and please kindly see if there are also some nanny­bots to help me improve my paren­ting ser­vi­ces and, oh, see if there are some Geisha­bots for me. Perhaps my wife won’t object if I tell her you get one too.

  • Nothing wrong with a good robot­man.
    Dorian Grey: Nice name.;)

  • Ins­tead of marriage coun­se­ling there’d be upgra­des. You could surf the web while lying in bed. pos­si­bi­li­ties are endless.

  • Make sure you use surge-protection so you don’t down­load a virus.

    Maybe I should have used “fire­wall” ins­tead of “surge-protection” but I couldn’t make it come out right.

  • jacob: it fas­ci­na­tes and appalls me. You could trade.

    sauer­kraut: Well I had guests this wee­kend and they kept me up late because they were watching a base­ball game. Feel sorry for me yet?

    Doug: I see poten­tial there as well Doug. I bet those little robot dogs would be quite inex­pen­sive to feed too.

    Johnm: Clea­ning is unplea­sant so the maid robot is something worth con­si­de­ring. I’m not seeing the robot marriage part­ner as a real possibility.

    Pia: It would be n ice to have a robot to prac­tice argu­ments on.

    Gil: I’ll check. I tried to order Dorian last night but couldn’t find any place quite ready to meet the qua­li­fi­ca­tions at this time.

    Robot­man: Human robot­men are dif­fe­rent. They are much less hygie­nic as well.

    EW: It could go either way too. It could be a per­fect solu­tion or a night­mare. It’s the not kno­wing that would be fun.

    Coyote: Surge pro­tec­tion sounds about right.

  • Ooops. came to do some further com­ment rea­ding here and sud­denly noti­ced I pos­ted twice. shame on me. but what do you think? when such a thing hap­pen, should you use a third mes­sage to apo­lo­gize or would that just make that worse…? :) )

    Coo­per I am not sur­pri­sed. we aim high. it takes a really hi-tec stuff to have us satisfied…

  • I was thin­king about hol­ding out for a female robot com­pa­nion … but then I deci­ded that I should work on being a bet­ter judge of cha­rac­ter and fin­ding some one worthy my life.

  • If somehow robots were extre­mely sexually attrac­tive (and of course, plia­ble to my whims), then I guess, yeah, hook me up with one.

    I’ve some­ti­mes come to the conc­lu­sion that a real rela­tionship requi­res:
    1) well, two peo­ple, pos­si­ble three — since there is one MFer han­ging around hoping to screw it up for the other two.
    2) Com­mu­ni­ca­tion that results in copu­la­tion. Can a poem getta a guy laid? Maybe a novel on exis­ten­tia­lism — results in a worthwhile cou­pling?
    3) Money. At least one per­son will be more inte­res­ted in having it than they should. Thus, your busi­ness major guy was actually your soul­mate, just, well he couldn’t get past some other cri­te­rion, I’ve yet to invent. Or yet to get from these weird posts…of yours. ;)
    4) Genes/Jeans. If we match up with our mirror or can see our­sel­ves wal­king in their Denims, maybe they are right for us. A robot could be all that. Like what we like and do what we want.

    If I had a female robot, first she’d be someone that doesn’t hate base­ball. Second, she has coo­king as a top pro­gram. Three, let the sexual olym­pics begin!!!
    Fourth, she’d bet­ter be able to write bet­ter than I! Fifth, just be good with cash, will ya!

    Well, humans and robots. I, ROBOT might be a good refresher course in that interaction.

  • Jason — I believe what you are loo­king for is called a blow-up doll. I hear they come in various sizes and have a num­ber of dif­fe­rent names. This may not be the pro­per place to inc­lude the squee­king part.

  • Gil: Nah, I’m sup­po­sed to delete it like a good blog­ger hos­tess would.
    Jon: That is an exce­llent solu­tion. Won­der why most peo­ple don’t think that way, even when not choo­sing their robot.

    Jason: That the­sis they gent­le­man wrote would lead one to believe that it is but a mat­ter of time until peo­ple start having those fee­ling toward their robots. But how sad really. Nothing is per­fect to make it so we might as well just …I don’[t know but I don[’t think I want a robot for anything but clea­ning and maybe giving me piggy backs. I used to love those things.

    SK: That whole blow-up doll thing is another kettle of fish.

  • When it comes down to it, we all have desi­res to act or choose not to act on. If there is a machine (or blow up) that pro­vi­des a release and somehow satia­tes our desi­res, then it is a worthy enough path.

    Arti­fi­cial means are beco­ming the sta­tus quo in America/World society. Drugs to balance us, cos­me­tic ope­ra­tions to mold us and machi­nes to do wha­te­ver we need them TO DO. Why would sex be ANY different?

    Pills for sexual dys­func­tion.
    Pills to make us happy.
    Com­pu­ters to do our ‘mun­dane’ cal­cu­la­tions. (can you do a multi-linear regres­sion or Laplace trans­form without it –in 60 seconds?)
    All the PDAs to com­mu­ni­cate, like, how you your so not into him/her. (How much of your ‘social inte­rac­tion’ now is on a key­board or video link? That’s pretty imper­so­nal, don’t you think?)
    DNA expe­ri­ments above ALL our heads. (Clone me up, Scotty!)

    No it isn’t what we should be doing — but as time marches on, these things are an inevitability…

    20+ years ago, if you pidd­led with a com­pu­ter TOO much, you were a geek, loner and a loser. Now all the “cool” peo­ple are com­pu­ter savvy. Plenty of igno­rant peo­ple (peo­ple you would never talk to nor­mally) have plenty of tech­no­logy in their hands that they avoi­ded like a pla­gue not too many years prior.

    Hence, when a func­tio­nal appa­ra­tus for part­nership comes out, and peo­ple mock, deride or sneer at its usage (and per­ma­nent lin­kage to it), we will soon enough find that this ROBOT will become accep­ted as peo­ple even­tually ack­now­ledge it use­ful and won­drous nature. (And since the first users will be very com­for­ta­ble with tech, it isn’t like they would be chea­ting on huma­nity that much…)

    Every prior gene­ra­tion loses something to tech.

    And no, I haven’t “blown up any date”, yet. ;)

  • I had a super long, and semi-witty res­ponse (a blog post in and of itself), but ALAS the tech­no­logy I used fai­led to res­pond in satia­ting way…

    But one day, my tech will pro­vide that ulti­mate satia­tion, and well, huma­nity be damned.

    When you use your PDA, lap­top, cell, mic­ro­wave or other ins­tru­ment of effi­ciency, remem­ber: those things are com­ple­ting tasks you find mundane.

    I’ve met a few peo­ple that feel sex is a mun­dane task too. They’re usually married. ;) So why not have it com­ple­ted by something, a robot, that won’t piss you off if you suck lite­rally and figu­ra­ti­vely at it?

    We star­ted this slip­pery slope with test tube babies, gene­tic map­ping and other enhan­ce­ments to our phy­si­cal beings. This is just another ave­nue of exploration.

  • sauer­kraut…

    Why is this so?…