Why I Don’t Go Pink for Breast Cancer Awareness Month

I don’t look good in pink. I never wore it, even as a child. My parents knew bet­ter. I’ll try to explain further my rea­sons for not beco­ming part of the pink blog beau monde.

I feel the whole “pink cam­paign” just feeds the breast can­cer cash cow, a cash cow which now inc­lu­des Yoplait Yogurt. Breast can­cer will remain a cash cow until something comes along to replace it, another ill­ness com­mon among upper middle class citi­zens with the money to pay for new and expen­sive treat­ment, something to feed the greed of cor­po­ra­tions who use breast can­cer as a pubic rela­tions tool.

Most women know about breast can­cer, it seems silly to turn pink for a month every year unless you work dili­gently all year long to pro­mote edu­ca­tion in regard to breast can­cer. Real edu­ca­tion. There are great stri­des in breast can­cer research, though sadly the research is not poo­led or coor­di­na­ted bet­ween govern­ment and pri­vate research. There is still no cure, the five year sur­vi­val rate, if caught early is bet­ween 95% and 97% depen­ding on what you read, and the disease is most pre­va­lent among older women.

I sup­port events in my com­mu­nity which make funds avai­la­ble for women who other­wise would be una­ble to get yearly mam­mo­grams and expen­sive treat­ment. I sup­port research into ear­lier detec­tion and cau­sa­tion, more research into envi­ron­men­tal issues which may be asso­cia­ted with breast can­cer — issues which could be inves­ti­ga­tive in fin­ding a cure, if not a way to pre­vent it. I sup­port edu­ca­tion events which give real facts about breast cancer.

I also sup­port a more coor­di­na­ted effort of the dif­fe­rent research bodies. Those truly loo­king for a cure should not find this idea out­lan­dish. I sup­port this all year long, and do not need a “pink month”. I hope all the pink blogs out there are pos­ting some real facts about breast can­cer. I think some are quite sin­cere, many though are disin­ge­nuous. I would bet that on most pink blogs you will not find breast can­cer men­tio­ned once in the pre­ce­ding year.

Many here know this, but for those who do not, my grand­mother died from a nor­mally non-lethal virus pic­ked up in South Ame­rica. She had post breast can­cer che­mothe­rapy indu­ced immune sys­tem sup­pres­sion and this virus killed her. She was atten­ding an aca­de­mic con­fe­rence in San­tiago Chile, I accom­pa­nied her. I’m glad I got to spend the last week of her life with her. The last time I saw her alive was upon lea­ving her at the air­port in Char­les­ton South Caro­lina. I waved goodbye to her and hea­ded to my con­nec­ting flight home.

This in my opi­nion. You have all the right in the world to pink up your blog, and peo­ple should res­pect your right to do so.

Can Wea­ring a Bra Cause Breast Cancer

Study sug­gests DDT, breast can­cer link — I believe it requi­res a sign in.

Breast Can­cer dot Org

Breast Can­cer Action

Think Before You Pink

There Is A Voice Inside Of You
That Whis­pers All Day Long,
“I Feel That This Is Right For Me,
I Know That This Is Wrong.“
No Teacher, Preacher, Parent, Friend
Or Wise Man Can Decide
What’s Right For You– Just Lis­ten To
The Voice That Speaks Inside.

Shel Sil­vers­tein

Share This
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • SphereIt
  • Mixx
  • FriendFeed

38 Comments

  • Pink does not become you.
    Your points will not be well taken by those who have pin­ked up their web­si­tes in order to take part in something they care nothing about, those who care about the issue will understand.

    Think cri­ti­cally or not at all.
    “pink blog beau monde“
    You’ve got to stop with the French words, they are killing me.

  • That’s why I take sup­por­ting cau­ses so seriously and rarely put my sup­port in through my web­site. There are just such a variety of issues that I know next to nothing about that it would seem false to say I sup­port one of them. I never feel like I have enough facts to tell peo­ple my opi­nion is edu­ca­ted enough to be valid.

  • I believe pink blogs, yellow rib­bons, or fake mag­ne­ti­zed rib­bons pos­ted on Chevy truck-bed tail­ga­tes (to surp­port our troops?), red rib­bons for aids, and most all gim­micks are pretty super­fi­cial. Luc­kily society is gro­wing inc­rea­singly aware of the idioc­racy invol­ving these attempts to appear to care when actually doing nothing but gai­ning awa­re­ness that does nothing.….

    Soon someone will invent a rib­ben that means nobody cares about doing anything, but I think that’s been done, but I don’t care about that.

    I am rather curious as to why in medi­cal advan­ce­ments we haven’t gai­ned any really big ans­wers to anything, but fixing things like hair loss, yellow toe­nails, rest­less leg syndrom??…things that don’t really seem to mat­ter with life or death…

    Perhaps more fetal tis­sue, and clo­ning needs to be stu­died but since the Mack Daddy Jesus for­bids this, we’re stuck wai­ting for other coun­tries that aren’t for­bid­den to dis­co­ver true cures.

  • Wow. I’ve always crin­ged at the pink-ribbon pro­duct tie-in, but was too much of a wuss to address it. Hard to cri­ti­cize something so close to the sis­terhood. Corps will do anything to make a buck. Great post. Thank you.

  • Let’s not for­get why AIDS is not a a mar­ke­ters dream even though somewhere around 3 million peo­ple died from it in 2006. It is not a mar­ke­ting cash cow, as you so truth­fully put it. Fifty-nine per­cent of peo­ple with AIDS live in Sub-Saharan Africa and almost thirty per­cent are from parts of Asia, the majo­rity in South and South East Asia. Estee Lau­der and Mer­ce­des aren’t such big hits in pla­ces where clean water is a luxury — no money to be made there. You can’t carry water three miles in a pink bag.

  • Had to come back and add that. I wasn’t thin­king last night.

  • My wife thanks you. I dis­like all the gra­tui­tous pin­king. Like you said some peo­ple genui­nely care and might be pro­vi­ding infor­ma­tion all year long but that is a rare case. She has always crin­ged at these cam­paigns. An aunt she was very close to died a cou­ple of years ago so breast can­cer is something she pays atten­tion to.

    Pia is the only one that can wear pink anyway.

    Good Point John.

  • Sorry to go off-topic, but I won­de­red if you saw this
    char­ming little story:

    http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/years/2007/1002071jena1.html

  • I think Shel Sil­vers­tein should come in every Skin­ner box. By the way, do you think we can use a metaphor other than “cash cow” for breast cancer?

  • I’m with you on this.

    Doug made a very good point about the cash cow.

    I’d rather just give my money, if I had any money which I don’t, directly to whiche­ver cha­rity I sup­port. Pink web­si­tes are use­less the peo­ple are doing something in real life all year long a bout the issue. The world is aware of breast can­cer, I don’t think anyone needs to go there. A post edu­ca­ting peo­ple about some of the les­ser known facts would serve bet­ter than a pink website.

    John, good point about AIDS.

  • Well, no won­der you are a girl after my own heart! I make it a point to shirk such gim­micky shit for many of the rea­sons you so bri­lliantly out­line and add to the list, for my own per­so­nal shir­king, the use of ani­mal research…

    I am also for true, cons­truc­tive research in the ways you have out­li­ned oh bri­lliant chica! Oh what a breath of fresh air to come and read you after mee­ting bimbo after heart-sinking bimbo out there!

    As for pink, I never wore it, grew to loathe it, until I had Lil’ Bohe­Mia… her love of all things girly and all things pink actually has me with quite a few pink items in my clo­set! I know… I have sold out to the color but I figure that it’s ok as long as it’s to Lil’ B! ;-P

    Big boho besos to you sweet Cooperina!

  • Right on, girl, right on. Thank All That Is Good at least some peo­ple in the world still know how to think.

    • Harriett, you are right on about than­king God that some peo­ple in the world still know how to think. Bet­ween the poor edu­ca­tion sys­tem we’ve had for about 50 years, and the mains­tream media medi­cal indoc­tri­na­tion it looks as though the public is being led to the slaugh­ter. For the few of us who have done research on ove­ruse of medi­cal radia­tion ima­ging, it’s a battle with our GP’s as far as being radia­ted, espe­cially since as all they have for treat­ment is the same gar­bage they had when they began trea­ting can­cer many years ago. The bene­fit to risk ratio (and who made that up?) is a hoax. Radio­lo­gists are very use­ful if there are bro­ken bones or another extreme emer­gency , but are over­doing it with patients who have minor com­plaints. I’ve stu­died the research of John Gof­man, M.D., Ph.D. Prof. of Mole­cu­lar Bio­logy as well as Sam Eps­tein, M.D. Research Onco­lo­gist, head of the Natio­nal Can­cer Coa­li­tion, who are the guys that radio­lo­gists are trying to shut up. I guess they have body guards or something. Any­way if I get can­cer again (l4 years sur­vi­vor of breast can­cer) I would defi­na­tely rather deal with the disease than the so called treat­ment. You know my radia­tion the­rapy was abor­ted early on all those years ago due to messy pro­blems as well as inci­sion ope­ning, They said I wouldn’t make it. Well here I am and I believe it is because I was una­ble to com­plete their radia­tion “therapy”.

  • Can’t help but think about my grand­mother who falls for every gim­mick and pro­bably has thou­sand of dollars worth of over pri­ced make-up and what not sit­ting around right now. Makes her feel bet­ter like she’s really done something. I don’t think she ever lif­ted a fin­ger to edu­cate or attend anything; she knows no more about breast can­cer now than she did ten years ago.

    She’d be one of those pink bloggers.

    El movi­miento se demues­tra andando.
    Las “pink blogs” se las lleva el viento.

  • I don’t neces­sa­rily see a need for a “pink month”.

    Both of my mater­nal grand­pa­rents died of can­cer: lung for gramps, ova­rian for grandma(it spread to her liver.) My mother in 2004 lost her kid­ney due to can­cer. So…I figure about 20+ years from now, unless I get to eating bet­ter foods, exer­cise reli­giously, never drink and other bad habits stop­ped, I’ll be loo­king for my first bout. (Gene­tics play a role…as you are pro­bably aware.)

    On a ligh­ter note, pink isn’t a color I’d wear unless I was major lea­gue con­fi­dent, had plenty of cash and Croc­ket and Tubbs also “had my back.”

    On a more off topic note: Sorry, Bal­ti­more needs to go back to being a minor lea­gue team. Great park, shitty team.

  • MoJo: You are wise oh mojo.

    Ben­net: The ans­wer is eco­no­mics dear friend. I honestly believe that. So much money to be made. That of course is mere spe­cu­la­tion but one which I have spo­ken to both scien­tists and phy­si­cians about and it seems it is not uncom­mon theory.

    Two Kni­ves: Your wel­come, yes it’s hard to post something you know is going to offend some but it is what it is at least in my opinion.

    John: That is most true, no money in the third world at least not for purcha­sing state of the art pharmaceuticals.

    jacob: gra­tui­tous pin­king. Nice term.You’re right only pia looks good in pink.

    Dedd: i hadn’t seen it until I loo­ked at these com­ments ear­lier this mor­ning. Thanks dedd.

    Doug: yes, yes he should and honestly it’s the per­fect unin­ten­ded metaphor.

    G: As we all would, or would anyone really if they gave it any thought.

    MizzyB: Well it’s ok because it was the new black, or something like that. If one truly likes the color I see no harm in it of course. :)
    So sweet to see you doing a little visi­ting. I miss you in your “bizziness”.

    Harriett: There are many more but some remain silent. I didn’t recog­nize you in that out­fit Harriett.

  • This is why I keep coming back. This, your P’s, and something about mag­ne­tic screwdrivers.

    A nation of robots and fools.

    The point above me about AIDS is something ever­yone needs to get in to their heads too.

  • I lost my Father to can­cer of the parathy­roid glands 5 years ago and my Mother fully reco­ve­red from Ova­rian can­cer 4 years ago…
    I’m not a big fan of pink but I have pos­ted a fuzzy teddy on my blog…
    I think I’ve said this before…stunning layout !!!!

  • Bri­lliant post Coo­per.
    I never knew how your grand­mother died and am so glad that you got to spend the last week of her life with her.

    Back to that magi­cal year of your birth. It was also horri­ble. The news was filled with school dis­tricts refu­sing to open and other truly stu­pid things because of AIDS.

    The same news­cas­ters who would report this news, smile and seem to agree with it, were all wea­ring red rib­bons the next year

    I have never watched the news on TV again

    I do think red rib­bons ser­ved a big pur­pose at first. they shoc­ked peo­ple. But the shock wore off and the rib­bons became a cliche.

    Though if peo­ple hadn’t been figh­ting for AIDS research 20 years ago – when in Ame­rica it was con­si­de­red a Gay and Hai­tian “thing” we wouldn’t be up to having fight for it in Africa.

    To deny how AIDS was in Ame­rica before it became sexy – is to deny his­tory, and we can’t. I might cringe at the red rib­bon, but how it came to be is important.

    i do believe that blog­gers who know something or even feel something strongly have a res­pon­si­blity to talk about that sub­ject – but am not wri­ting about breast can­cer for the rea­sons you said.

    And yes my blog is pink. I look good in sha­des of pink but gene­rally wear black, gray, taupe, olive etc.

    I just like to shock

  • This is Katrina, com­mu­ni­ca­tions asso­ciate at BCA. Thank you for your sup­port! It means a lot to all of us. Don’t for­get to ask the six cri­ti­cal ques­tions of pink rib­bon mar­ke­ters: how much money is going to the cause, what is it fun­ding, how much was spent on mar­ke­ting ver­sus the amount being dona­ted, what is the maxi­mum dona­tion, and, most impor­tantly, is the pro­duct making us sick.
    Take action on our 2007 cam­paign at: http://www.thinkbeforeyoupink.org/Pages/TakeAction.html
    Thanks again and keep blogging!

  • JoeG: I’m glad you’ve stuck around all this time Joe. Mag­ne­tic screwdrivers…that was a hot search term for a year or so after that post. God knows why.

    Lake­trees: My per­so­nal fee­ling on can­cer is that we could do a whole lot bet­ter. Yes I think you have said before how you liked this. I too am still rather fond of the design.

    Pia: One thing I often for­get is that I was pos­ting in a pri­vate jour­nal among friends the sum­mer before my sopho­more year, so when she died the entry was in that jour­nal. I didn’t start at blog­ger until a few months after she actually died.

    You also wear pink bet­ter than most.

    As for AIDS, the fact that it is not killing enough of the right peo­ple hurts the research.

    Katrina: I was happy to find your site when I was loo­king around for things to subs­tan­tiate my opinion.

  • The approach with pin­king the month is simi­lar to what they do with Black His­tory Month. Some teachers take it to mean they should teach black-related his­tory only during February. It’s a bit anno­ying in the effor to move for­ward. I am cer­tain the MLK would disa­gree with the school admi­nis­tra­tor who sta­ted on tele­vi­sion that teaching about sla­very was best done during that one month!!! Espe­cially since James Earl Ray shot him down during April.

    Still, every bit helps. I just wish they’d make those pink car mag­nets in some place other than China.

  • I’m glad you don’t fall for it. It would have been easy to fall for the mar­ke­ting part after your grand­mother died. I never buy anything I wouldn’t buy anyway.

  • You know, I will admit, I have a pink rib­bon; it is out of res­pect and upon request of my dear friend Dee who was diag­no­sed with breast can­cer over 5 years ago and who is now can­cer free. And I love pink; I’m just a girl like that.

    But I will not fall for all the mar­ke­ting bullshit of going pink for an entire month. That is a ploy to make this a money making machine at the cost of people’s lives. I will not be a part of that.

  • Every bit does help, but I don’t see a whole lot of encou­ra­ging to do anything or edu­ca­tion just pink blogs follo­wing the crowd.

    KAITI: i know you so I know that.
    Mar­va­llus: That is a whole dif­fe­rent story of course, and there are many peo­ple who do it for good rea­sons. Just edu­cate, send peo­ple to pla­ces to get infor­ma­tion, and tell them to donate their money directly.

  • It all really just ridi­cu­lous, there is a cure (more than likely) howe­ver the money machine would come to a screeching halt if it were relea­sed. After all it only affects women (mostly). If breast can­cer was killing off the male popu­la­tion a cure would be out and avai­la­ble imme­dia­tely. Isn’t it strange how men are cured of their tes­ti­cu­lar and colon can­cers, but woman are dying from ute­rus, cer­vi­cal and breast can­cer. Male doc­tors are quick to remove a woman’s ute­rus etc. rather than find a cure for what is killing them.

  • Debohobo, with all due res­pect, colon can­cer affects both gen­ders. Look at all the work Katie Kou­ric did after her hus­band died of it. Tes­ti­cu­lar can­cer has a much lower “cure” rate than does breast can­cer, even when caught in early sta­ges. I have a cou­sin who is in the ter­mi­nal sta­ges of that disease now. And then there’s the big one: pros­tate can­cer. That’s what killed Jerry Orbach. And a very com­mon form of treat­ment, if it can be called that, is to leave it alone until it beco­mes serious. Hardly what I call a cure.

  • What you wear on the outside doesn’t mat­ter. We are all PINK on the inside.

  • I put the follo­wing on our home page in hopes it would stand out.

    Web sites will Go Pink during the month of Octo­ber to bring atten­tion to Breast Can­cer Awa­re­ness Month, get peo­ple tal­king about breast can­cer, and raise money for research.

    But to be clear, rai­sing money isn’t the pri­mary pur­pose of this web event.

    The hope is that you turn your site pink (in wha­te­ver way works for your site), go out to that World Wide Web thing (in fact you’re on it right now! :) ) and edu­cate your­self about the mul­ti­ple issues rela­ted to Breast Can­cer, then take that new­found know­ledge and tell someone else what you’ve learned.

    Not ever­yone will read that. Not ever­yone who is Going Pink will think it’s more than a cool, fun way to “raise awa­re­ness.” It truly is my hope that peo­ple edu­cate them­sel­ves and pass that know­ledge on to others. You never know how know­ledge will influence someone, but I hope it can be in a posi­tive way in at least a few people.

    I don’t advo­cate buying pink vacuum clea­ners to show sup­port. I hope peo­ple will donate money to orga­ni­sa­tions that actually help, but only if they have money to spare.

    If any one would be inte­res­ted in sha­ring their opi­nions (hope­fully laced with facts) on the Pink for Octo­ber blog, please regis­ter and we will publish it. We only do rough copy edi­ting to make sure spe­lling and gram­mar are correct and all links work.

    Thanks for lin­king this up on the 9rules note.

  • You’re so right on this, Pink for Octo­ber seems to be a band­wa­gon that web­site desig­ners jump onto for a month to show off their design skills. I’m sure it was star­ted with good inten­tions but that’s unfor­tu­na­tely been lost amidst all the hulla­ba­loo about the colour rather than the disease.

  • Weishing, have you loo­ked through the list of sites Going Pink? Most, and by most I mean almost all sites that are par­ti­ci­pa­ting are not run by peo­ple who are web­site desig­ners. Look through the list, see how peo­ple are res­pon­ding beyond the color.

    As I said above, many will just change the color of their site and leave it at that. But many will do more than that too.

    Your sta­te­ment sounds like an assump­tion to me. And if you feel this way, please join Pink for Octo­ber and do more than turn your site pink. Unless you are already doing something, in which case please leave a link to it.

  • Debo: I have no idea if there is a cure I do believe the medi­ci­nes they just keep inven­ting are just more and more toxic and not near enough is done on research for cau­sa­tion, that is much more expen­sive and no where near as pro­fi­ta­ble but much more likely to actually lead to an cure.

    Matthew: I have no objec­tion to peo­ple doing something they always do. I have a large pro­blems with a band­wa­gon full of peo­ple who do things for no rea­son, and I have a much lar­ger pro­blems with the mar­ke­ting done by cor­po­ra­tion who sell all year long under the guise of breast can­cer. I think peo­ple know about breast can­cer. I think if they care they should actually advo­cate for bet­ter health care edu­ca­tion affor­da­ble treat­ment and real educ­tion. I feel they should list the faci­li­ties doing research on breast can­cer and encou­rage peo­ple to sup­port whiche­ver one they pre­fer and why.

    I rarely if ever write about breast can­cer, so for me to turn pink would be ludic­rous, but I unders­tand others wan­ting to, but as I said I find most pink for the month blogs disingenuous.

    This par­ti­cu­lar post was writ­ten because I have had peo­ple ask me seve­ral times over the last cou­ple of years why I do not go pink or have pink rib­bons con­si­de­ring my grand­mother died as a result of breast can­cer treat­ment. It wasn’t writ­ten neces­sa­rily in regard to any blog cam­paigns it just so hap­pens many blogs turn pink and peo­ple send emails advo­ca­ting going pink so blogs get mentioned.

    I also think that there are many peo­ple who do things rou­ti­nely for breast can­cer, other ill­nes­ses or any cause as part of their daily life, ove­rall I find this a much bet­ter way to actually do something about issues one cares about.

    I feel there is an acute awa­re­ness of breast can­cer. I don’t think peo­ple need to go pink. I have other things I think peo­ple should be aware of and have only so much time to blog so I prio­ri­tize these things, I think many peo­ple do the same. I fully appre­ciate that ever­yone has the right to do what they want and should and hope the peo­ple out there going pink are offe­ring up some worthwhile infor­ma­tion. I’ll look through some tomo­rrow if I have the time.

    Weishing: I think the pink thing star­ted long before blog desig­ners got in to it, entrenched in the heart of cor­po­rate greed.

  • wow, where have I been.
    I see both points of view. I see your point clearly because peo­ple fall for a lot of things without thin­king. Most peo­ple don’t think they just follow ran­domly, which is why they go pink, bllue, or pur­ple wha­te­ver the case may be.

    You should have expec­ted to offend some peo­ple with your post even if you didn’t mean to. Peo­ple get really upset when their moti­ves are questioned.

  • Matthew, I’m not ques­tio­ning the spi­rit behind the cam­paign to go pink on blogs (which I know you star­ted!). It’s just I get a little irked when peo­ple go pink merely to jump on the band­wa­gon rather than unders­tan­ding what it really sig­ni­fies. Some do it to freshen up their site, some others do it because they think their theme looks nice in pink, these aren’t rea­sons for going pink. Someone who merely pla­ces a badge in sup­port but wri­tes a thought­ful article on breast can­cer awa­re­ness is much more relevant.

    I guess I shouldn’t gene­ra­lise, I’m not cri­ti­ci­sing the spi­rit of your cam­paign. My ire is direc­ted more towards those who go pink yet don’t really unders­tand the pur­pose of it all. I myself don’t “go pink” because there are just too many cam­paigns to sup­port. I’m actually more con­cer­ned about the mas­sac­res in Burma at the moment. There are lots of things that kill a lot more unfor­tu­nate and inno­cent peo­ple, like the mili­tary action in Iraq for example.

  • Also, if you hap­pen to peruse some of the com­ments on “pin­ki­fied” blogs, you’ll find that quite a few of them focus on how beau­ti­ful the site/theme looks in pink rather than on breast can­cer, which is unfortunate.

  • weisheng: I think I like you.
    I do think that those who do something with rea­so­nably good intent do get hurt by those who do not. I hap­pen to agree with you on Burma and other issues because they are things many peo­ple in this country are not aware of and need to be. Some peo­ple disa­gree with me on this as I’m sure they’d disa­gree with you. Matthew wants to bring atten­tion to breast can­cer. I hope he brings edu­ca­tion. I just don’t hap­pen to agree that pin­king is the way to go but says he has had some suc­cess in rai­sing awa­re­ness and edu­ca­tion and if he has than in the end he has ser­ved his pur­pose and has been suc­cess­ful for his intent. I can unders­tand that though a mul­ti­tude of pink blogs some have to be worthwhile and have worthwhile infor­ma­tion. I just think most are disin­ge­nuous and of course that is not the fault of Matthew or anyone. I par­ti­ci­pa­ted in the boobi-thon when youn­ger. Until I loo­ked at the cam­paigns they sup­por­ted and where the money went and them I rea­li­zed it was not for me. I just want peo­ple to think before they do things. A pink blog in and of itself does not raise awa­re­ness, and buying Estee Lau­der or wha­te­ver will not find a cure.

  • I guess I’d admit my mis­take at direc­ting my first com­ment at the Pink for Octo­ber cam­paign itself, because Matthew’s aim is admi­ra­ble. It’s more an irri­ta­tion at those sites that don’t reflect that aim, so for that gene­ra­li­sa­tion I would apo­lo­gise. The pro­blem with such cam­paigns is they always start with a noble intent but some of those par­ti­ci­pa­ting end up derai­ling it. I guess that’s just ine­vi­ta­ble. For exam­ple, as much of an Apple fan­boy as I am, I get irri­ta­ted when I see them pro­mo­ting the product(RED) iPods. These are meant to pro­mote AIDS awa­re­ness, but at the pre­sen­ta­tions it’s pretty obvious Steve Jobs him­self doesn’t have much inte­rest in the cause and peo­ple buy it because they like that “pretty red colour”.

    Well, I brought up Burma because I saw your ban­ner below. I was quite struck by a Bur­mese friend’s post on Face­book because she’s living in semi-exile in the UK while her family remains in Burma. She desc­ri­bed how her mom came so close to death when a sol­dier poin­ted a gun at her head and told her to walk and not look back. I come from the nearby state of Sin­ga­pore and the West often points a fin­ger at us for being a nanny state and having an autho­ri­ta­rian govern­ment. That’s true but for us Sin­ga­po­rean citi­zens it doesn’t make a dif­fe­rence because we’re enjo­ying a pros­pe­rous eco­nomy and a fan­tas­tic stan­dard of living. But a govern­ment like the Bur­mese junta mas­sac­ring its own citi­zens is enti­rely dif­fe­rent and very regrettable.

    Unlike you, howe­ver, I think I’m very apathe­tic when it comes to pro­mo­ting cau­ses. I just feel, pro­bably wrongly in your opi­nion, that what we do doesn’t really make a real dif­fe­rence in the end. There are so many layers of power that it’s impos­si­ble for our thoughts to fil­ter to the top. Look at the US, that’s why it’s citi­zens vote on such a narrow spec­trum of issues, because that’s the agenda that the power bro­kers are defining.

  • I don’t always agree with you, but I see that you are objec­tive in your
    pos­tings. Des­pite the dif­fe­ren­ces I still enjoy rea­ding your posts and I
    often learn even when our view­points are dif­fe­rent. :-)