Britney, Blog Purity and Blogging Schedules: Issues and Answers Edition

“Suck It Jesus” remarks from a not so funny come­dian with a badly stretched face are not news, except in poin­ting out that Fox news reports it as such.

As for blog purity, there are very few blog purists out there these days, inc­lu­ding myself. Having said that, the purer you are the more likely I am rea­ding you. The pure attract me even as I dive into the realm of the tain­ted. Feel free to enjoy my nefa­rious journey.

Many blog­gers, most with alter­nate non blog­ging lives, are trying to limit their time online in order to do work and get their other life tasks done. I assume some of them are having bet­ter luck than I. I always thought I had a modi­cum of self con­trol. Wrong.

I am doing a fair amount of work at home over the next few weeks. I find my self con­trol is not what I would like. I also find myself fas­ci­na­ted by the evol­ving social cons­truct of social net­works as they relate to blog­gers. I set a sche­dule for myself today in which I was to stay off line until 1PM. I ran, did a rough draft of a pro­po­sal, drank a lot of cof­fee, wrote a second draft, and at 12.57 PM I went online.

Now why, so close to suc­cess as I was at that point, could I not wait that extra three minu­tes? Who knows. I only know that wor­king in front of my home com­pu­ter on full time basis would be a situa­tion bathed in doom. The inter­net sto­kes the fla­mes of capri­cious­ness, fla­mes I cons­tantly try to to douse with a strict work ethic. As loathe as I am to admit it, I like the fire.

I have nothing to say about Brit­ney Spears — wow aren’t you relie­ved. Nothing that is except the song is a catchy dance num­ber, and I was disap­poin­ted to hear my for­merly favo­rite paid to be libe­ral pun­dit Keith Olber­mann get a chuc­kle out of a com­ment on her weight. Wait, oh right, it’s only cer­tain fuc­ked up indi­vi­duals and cau­ses that you care about right? Gotcha.

Catch up on what is going on with the Jena Six at Black Pers­pec­tive Net and keep wri­ting your media.

Don’t for­get Dar­fur is an unfor­gi­va­ble hell on earth; one that China would like to for­get while they sug­gest we have some fun and let the games begin.

Share This
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • SphereIt
  • Mixx
  • FriendFeed

24 Comments

  • Wow, so this is the first time I’m commenting…weird, since I read your blog cons­tantly via feed. =) Anyhow, just wan­ted to drop a line saying that I tag­ged you to do the 7 P’s meme because I’m curious about your ans­wers and think that they’ll be really insight­ful (if not humo­rous as well). Oh, and I chec­ked out the webhost you recom­men­ded, site­ground, and I really like it…I’ve deci­ded to use them to self-host. Thanks!!!

  • Coo­per,

    You wrote:

    “I also find myself fas­ci­na­ted by the evol­ving social cons­truct of social net­works as they relate to bloggers.”

    You know, I’ve been noti­cing that myself, and won­de­ring about it. I ima­gi­ned myself very late to the party because I’ve really only been making efforts to work on my blog and write regu­larly since about June. Lear­ning about MyBlo­gLog and Blog­Ca­ta­log gave me a big boost, and I’m trying to be very thought­ful about my invol­ve­ment in both: I have little use for crowds or big sta­tis­tics unless they are the RESULT of my blog­ging rather than the moti­va­tion for it. So I add con­tacts and sites fairly slowly and care­fully, wan­ting to be in it for the long haul and not for wha­te­ver men­tal spi­kes I get out of sud­den sur­ges in traf­fic. That’s hard some times of course. Any­way, what you said sug­gests to me that this belief I had that I had jum­ped in so late (which I’ve been get­ting sus­pi­cious of any­way) is false, and I’m kinda plea­sed to hear it.

    Well… rather than suck up all your com­ment space, I’ll just say that I’m likely to explore some of these the­mes you men­tio­ned here also. I AM fas­ci­na­ted by blog­gers net­works, by the fact that they exist and by the fact that they’re beco­ming an ende­mic part of world cul­ture. There are so many angles I could look at it from and write about it, it’s almost overwhel­ming — like loo­king into the big­gest prism I ever saw and trying to find the center.

    Thanks so much for stop­ping by my site and lea­ving a cou­ple more com­ments. I’m glad you took a look at the Mag­num essay on Sep­tem­ber 11; I like the work they do there, for many rea­sons. There’s also an exce­llent one on Cher­nobyl; if you go to my site, I have “Cher­nobyl” lis­ted under “Tags on del.icio.us” and there is a link from there. It’s stun­ning; it left me shaking.

    As to blog purists … eh, I don’t know if I am one or not … but if I look like one, it’s because I’m still fin­ding my way around and haven’t had time to break all the rules just yet. Glad you’re rea­ding me anyway!

    Bye for now!

  • Pure as the dri­ven you are.

    Your anth­ro­po­logy knee is showing.

  • I assume by pure you mean an undi­lu­ted blog with a sin­gle thrust: poli­tics, coo­king, pop culture.

    I guess I fall into the tain­ted cate­gory. And proud of it!

  • I don’t know what qua­li­fies as being pure these days. I take a look at some of the posts I wrote three years ago when I first star­ted my site and I rea­lize how much it has all involved.

    Some­ti­mes I worry that it will turn into a parody of itself and I will just be pos­ting things, not because they’re of merit, but because I’ve always pos­ted on a cer­tain schedule.

    I would just hate it to become the filler and non­sense
    I know it could quickly become if I ever lose my diligence.

  • When you have a calling it is hard to ignore. I’m sur­pri­sed you gut­ted it out that long, (as I sit here com­men­ting at 8 am)… !

    On the Olber­mann chuc­kling, I don’t much care for the guy, so I won’t try and defend his actions, but we were just tal­king in psych class about how peo­ple have a ten­dency to laugh at things that make them uncom­for­ta­ble. Did he seem uneasy? Or was he just being a ste­reoty­pi­cal media meat head?

  • I can never work at home. If I’m wri­ting, gra­ding, wor­king on any sort of outside pro­ject, I have to get out of the house. If I’m at home, nothing gets done. I applaud your self con­trol, your dedi­ca­tion, and your 3-minute self-reward.

  • I work from an office in my home. This is a fairly new phe­no­mena, I am just now get­ting the hang of it. i am loo­king for office space just in case.

    I see you as fairly disciplined.

    Blog purity, like any kind of purity, is overrated.

    Keep the spi­rit pure.

  • Oh my favo­rite girl you are a woman now blogger/person – why did you hit on some of my favo­rite sub­jects?
    I’m only let­ting myself com­ment on a few not-random blogs. used to have an ama­zing amount of self-discipline. There was nothing like wor­king at home and pulling all-nighters so I could finish pre-deadline and I guess feel supe­rior
    Then I dis­co­ve­red the crue­lest muse – blog­ging – it suc­ked me in and ans­we­red the need for imme­diate gra­ti­fi­ca­tion
    Every wri­ter cra­ves feed­back and to deny that – well I envied one of my father’s friends for his suc­cess and it tur­ned out he envied me for the feed­back I would get. It tur­ned out that most “real” wri­ters I knew did
    But I’m sca­red that I lost the true dis­ci­pline I need for “real” wri­ting. Which is why I don’t really touch blog­ging and social net­works – though that would make a great the­sis
    Wri­ting as oppo­sed to blog­ging is soli­tary. it’s many hours spent not tal­king to others, not fee­ling the need to have five tabs open
    I have to not care about my blog or care about the “new” enthu­sed blog­gers who ask me to guest post or wha­te­ver and when I refuse “call me out” in a very passive-aggressive (hate that term) man­ner and say that I could be one of the great blog­gers if only.…Screw them I think, I need time to write and to have a life – and real wri­ting lea­ves little time for that – blog­ging inces­sently lea­ves no time for anything and what does it get one? Other than mee­ting some great peo­ple?
    I don’t do ads because it’s not worth the time for the small sums invol­ved. I refu­sed spon­sorship because my blog is mine alone and I don’t want to be behol­den. I guess it’s easier for me than for some others because I can afford to, but I do see too many peo­ple too money hungry in blog­ging and it just doesn’t hap­pen unless you’re Darren – have of course totally researched this – peo­ple can’t make the amount of money they claim to for rea­sons that are too long to go into here
    Blog­ging should be for fun and joy and it’s not for me now. I guess if I really wan­ted to I could do a money making blog, and might in con­junc­tion with my next career if the book doesn’t work – but have to give it my all
    Now that I have writ­ten a post on your com­ments once more – have to go back to my soli­tude
    three minu­tes too soon is per­fect, I applaud you for that

  • Joanne: Thanks Joanne, I will be over and take part espe­cially since mojo likes to read things other than poli­ti­cal namby pamby…

    I read you via the rea­der too. That is the hazard of rea­ders but so convenient.

    I’m glad you pop­ped in.

    Dale:
    Dale, my first ven­ture into any kind of social net­work was because I con­tri­bu­ting to an ongoing study at my school. I was never par­ti­ci­pa­tory on my blog log until this spring des­pite sig­ning up last Decem­ber. I think each per­son has to find a place they find use­ful, and or inte­res­ting, and the more focu­sed parts of any net­work are I think the bet­ter they will do, although I have no idea about that in reality.

    I was sur­pri­sed to find some really good blogs over there while dig­ging and am happy to have some of them on my blo­groll currently.

    I enjoy your blog and was happy to have found it and you know I’ll be over.

    John: You sure it’s not the whole leg?

    San­dra: That an untain­ted by link bai­ting, par­ti­ci­pa­ting in com­mu­ni­ties with no real pur­pose in mind or maybe some vague pur­pose in mind, using ads, par­ti­ci­pa­ting in memes etc.

    MoJo: You are the pic­ture of a purist mojo.

    Dave J: *cough* I did notice that. ;)
    Now that you men­tion it it might have b een an uncom­for­ta­ble chuc­kle but the words he used didn’t indi­cate it to be so.

    Coyote: ha ha, I can say that I get more work in a cof­fee shop with my com­pu­ter than I do at home on my desktop.

    Jacob: The spi­rit, yes of course my spi­rit is pure but I am seve­rely tain­ted. Works for me Jacob. It sounds like your busi­ness is gro­wing, and you may need a regu­lar size office anyway.

    Pia: It is the the­sis of many now I fear. I also have to say that although a blog­ger is a wri­ter there is a dis­tinct dif­fe­rence, for me, in a blog­ger like myself who blogs and the­re­fore has to write to do so, and a wri­ter like your­self who wri­tes, but also blogs.

  • What is a blog purist? Je ne com­prends pas.

    I’m laughing at 12:57. I’m a 1:02 guy, but it’s the same obses­sion. I’d have been thin­king about 1 from 12:32.

  • Yes, I did find it hard to believe Brit would get such a bad for being a nor­mal sized girl. From what I HAD to see, since the remote bat­te­ries went sour, the Brit thing is overdone.

    As far as resis­tance to doing the blog, I have no ans­wers. Look: it’s like jour­na­ling, inte­rac­ting in social dis­cus­sions and befrien­ding various peo­ple all at once. So it is meant to be addictive.

    The fact you still run a bit — and do some work worthy of noting — makes you a little more con­tro­lled than say, me. (Can’t com­ment on others in this zero-one world.)

    Self con­trol: if you didn’t have it, it would be far more noti­cea­ble by those around you. And you would blog about it…in a nega­tive way. Saying, “Why don’t peo­ple unders­tand me?” Since you don’t, it says that you are very con­tro­lled in this pat­tern of beha­vior called blogging.

  • Twit­ney Spears is fair game for laugh­ter. Her set on the MVA’s was so pain­ful to watch that I simply had to change that chan­nel. She’s given plenty of juice to those of us some­ti­mes pos­ses­sed of the poi­son pen. I sus­pect she really, no, really, enjoys the atten­tion — even if a good bit of it is very nega­tive. I am happy to oblige. I guess that puts me more in the pain-in-the-arse type of blog­ger than a purist. Wha­te­ver that is.

  • Coo­per, I find more and more you’re a White lady after my own heart. (no racial con­des­cen­sion, I kid)

    But for real, I just wrote a post yes­ter­day (though I haven’t published it yet) about how I’m dis­ma­yed with the over load of pure cele­brity and fashion blog­ging; not that I don’t think enter­tain­ment should be blog­ged about at all, but that so many peo­ple waste their time cop­ying con­tent from media take out all day when they have this plat­form, is dissapoint.

    I’m also attrac­ted to the more pure blogs, that’s why I keep coming here. And that fact that you keep lin­king me and my dash board keeps sho­wing inco­ming traf­fic from your post :P

    Thanks for the pub; and I’ll be drum­ming up Dar­fur more than lately after this Jena Rally.

  • “sto­king the fla­mes of capri­cious­ness”… I love the poetry you exude. purity is the impos­si­ble dream; I admire your stretch goal. hey, in my busy RT life I met a woman yes­ter­day whom I thought loo­ked like a youn­ger, pretty Brit­ney and men­tio­ned it to her… she was kinda sur­pri­sed. hmm maybe it was just me. any­way, cele­brityhood is a nasty prize for anyone and we should be thank­ful for our pri­vate anony­mity. very few care if I’m over­weight, DUI or other­wise delin­quent. any­way, keep stri­ving for purity and bet­ter luck next time with those last three minu­tes… dude, those are the impor­tant ones!

  • So many things I wouldn’t know if I didn’t read you. So many things you haven’t said.

    If by blog purist you mean someone who wri­tes a blog no one reads, that would be me. You left that land a long time ago.

    If you mean something else, and I think you do, I wouldn’t worry about it. Three minu­tes is bet­ter than five. If the work was done it doesn’t matter.

    I would like some fla­mes of capri­cious­ness to stoke.

  • Doug: Look in the mirror my tail wag­ging long eared friend. Not the loo­king glass…

    Jason P: I so love it when peo­ple called me controlled.

    SK: She is fair game for laugh­ter — for those who want to bother laughing at an obviously trou­bled indi­vi­dual who has made some pathe­tic choices.

    The issue here was her wieght and the fact she wasn’t in shape; it was men­tio­ned all over the place, mostly by men. I would like to see the last time men sat around com­plai­ning about an over drug­ged male pop star carr­ying on an extra four pounds or com­men­ting on the fact that his arms weren’t buff?

    Yea it doesn’t hap­pen. You know why it doesn’t happen?

    Of course you do.

    Yobachi: Ori­gi­nal would be nice.
    I will keep on the Jena thing until it is over, and it will be over. Unfor­tu­na­tely the injus­ti­ces are ram­pant in this land of the …what? Oh yeah… blind.

    toma­we­some: t’is because I read Doug ‚and Pia, and Illy­ria, and a variety of other peo­ple who actually write, that I appear to have some kind of way with words. I am a sponge.

    I think it would be horri­ble to be famous. I am tired of hea­ring it though, and men just need to shut up sometimes.

    I know those last three minu­tes are my downfall.

    Jake: I’ll send you some.….flames of capri­cious­ness they are on sale this week.

  • Well admit­ted Coo­per. I admit my online ten­den­cies all the time. I am an onli­neho­lic, spen­ding at least 12 hours every day in front of my screen. that is if I am not rea­ding my friend’s blogs until I hear the sprin­klers start doing their mor­ning job outside (that’s 3AM).

    I have been con­nec­ted to the web since about 1995 when I had my first (14,400kbps) modem. The web was a very imma­ture envi­ron­ment back then but I could sense it in the air. It took me about 3 years to rea­lize I don’t want to keep on doing what I was doing any­more (com­mer­cial copyw­ri­ting for adver­ti­sing agen­cies) and ins­tead want to make my living out of the Inter­net and be online all the time.

    The Inter­net brings all sorts of peo­ple to meet. But more impor­tant, it brings great minds together. Great minds like Cooper’s and like of some other folks here I have been rea­ding com­ments from recently.

    I truly believe a free Inter­net would change everything. A lot of bad stuff was allo­wed to hap­pe­ned through his­tory because great minds where thin­king apart. The inter­net can bring them all together and maybe save the pla­net. If anything is even capa­ble of saving it in it’s current sta­tus, that is.

  • Coo­per, another new design? I like it. And I love this post. You are abso­lu­tely right. It can become an addiction…not Britney…the com­pu­ter online. Watch it.

    And if you have many lives…many sides to your­self you’ll manage it all. Somehow. And you will. Cause you’re that good…that talen­ted and that smart.

    I’m finally back. Wait till you see some of the cool things I did and peo­ple I met with and wor­ked with on this trip to Maui. I’ll be wri­ting about it on my blog

  • Coo­per, Con­grats to you and good luck on the weeks coming up. Have you chea­ted yet with the idea of peru­sing other’s blogs not quite coun­ting as com­pa­red to wri­ting in your own? I mana­ged to stick it out for nine hours on only one of the days I said I’d strictly work. But I did finish what I set out to do. Good thing, because I was brain-dead when I was done. Years of brin­ging work home and having to get it done has tain­ted me — so the dis­trac­tions are lovely, kno­wing that I’ll still do what I have to do. Purist? Is there one any­more? The second someone calls them­sel­ves that, they’re suspect.

  • Off topic: Mas­ter­piece thea­ter? I never can say I’ve watched though I do watch PBS at times, Char­lie Rose, Tavis Smi­ley and NOVA.

    The BBC world news is pretty decent usually. (I lis­ten in the mor­ning 5AM.)

    Have a good one!

  • […] Paul led me to 101 more rea­sons why I like being inde­pen­dent.  Of course, there’s always the down-side. […]

  • Gil: Con­si­de­ring in past times I spent no time in front of the com­pu­ter it almost unfatho­ma­ble that I spend as much time as I do. Most of the time it’s on I am not really on it, but the fact I leave it on all the time and am always temp­ted bothers me some.

    A free inter­net, and inter­net to pla­ces where it is yet to be, would change many things.

    Ev: ha, ha , I’ve actually had this quite some time I think, at least a month. I will be over for sure.

    Kelly: No I was really good about that the one day, today not so much, but then I left, went to a cof­fee shop and did some work on my lap­top — the one without a wire­less card. I obviously had some suc­cess with that. ;)

    Jason P: I love me some Mas­ter­piece Theater

  • “…inter­net to pla­ces where it is yet to be, would change many things.” Cheers to that Coo­per. agree. http://laptop.org for example.