cooper culture
Image 01

Monday Mash

June 18th, 2007 by cooper

Something for you to be happy about.
I’m too busy to change my theme this week.

Lots of news posts about China and the media this week. A blog (China Rising) post by Tim John­son, the Bei­jing bureau chief for McC­latchy News­pa­pers really says it all.

Pres­sure on the foreign media

This whole “China is a great place to visit. We treat visi­tors and repor­ters well” is a bunch of rot­ten gra­pes, an Olym­pic smokescreen.

Do not turn your back on the kid who wants to steal your lollipop.

— —  —  —  — –

Mikey’s post briefly refe­ren­cing pedophi­lia just rein­for­ced some fee­lings I had yesterday.

My brother is currently lea­sing, with option to buy, my parent’s old house. All this while he deci­des whether he wants to com­mute to his down­town job or give it up and move clo­ser in. He hos­ted a fathers day event cau­sing rela­ti­ves from as far away as France and as close as twenty miles des­cend. He was like a pea­cock hos­ting his first “big peo­ple event”. If you ever read this Josh you are a pretty peacock — seriously.

There were a variety of fathers and future fathers and lots of little kids han­ging around pool. I heard these kids were rela­ted to me in some way. Many of the little ones I didn’t recog­nize right off. I’ve heard of them of course, maybe even seen them once or twice ran­domly through the years. Some are so young I had pre­viously only seen pho­tos. I like kids because they aren’t mine. I can play with them and leave, so it was all good. I have yet to arrive at the stage where I look at them as something I might want to have. I still look at chil­dren as me only youn­ger and bet­ter able to mani­pu­late them­sel­ves on a tram­po­line, or down the slide of the pool and all that.

I took a bunch of pic­tu­res of the kids pla­ying around in the pool and when I got back here last night was con­si­de­ring uploa­ding them to Flickr. The thought floa­ting back and forth was “can’t do that there are pedophi­les out there”. Con­si­de­ring half these kids tend to run around with their bathing suits falling off a good per­cent of the time (it’s here­di­tary) it just see­med best that I do not post pic­tu­res of them run­ning around in their tiger pat­ter­ned swim wear. It’s sad that I have to think that way, but I do.

Share This
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • FriendFeed
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks

20 Responses to “Monday Mash”

  1. I know how you feel — I am hesi­tant to use pho­tos I’ve found in which chil­dren are depic­ted. But I think if the pic­tu­res are anony­mous, there is pro­bably no problem.

    China is rising up to fill the vacuum we’ve of where we used to be.

  2. GoldyNo Gravatar says:

    I love kids… I am lucky that my brother has four of them so I can play with them ins­tead of having my own :)

    It’s funny, my wife’s best friend just had a daugh­ter and now she seems almost ready for her own.

  3. mojo shiversNo Gravatar says:

    Yeah, it’s always going to be a touchy sub­ject where kids are con­cer­ned. I know firsthand how much ire can be rai­sed when one tends to gloss over the sub­ject in one’s day-to-day affairs.

  4. jacobNo Gravatar says:

    It’s unfor­tu­nate we have to think this way but the ways of the world make it neces­sary. I would be hesi­tant to put pic­tu­res of my son on the inter­net for a variety of rea­sons, at least until he is older.

    We send pic­tu­res back and forth to friends, but my wife doesn’t like the idea of them being pos­ted anywhere.

    It’s funny how all of a sud­den, pre Olym­pics, China wants to make them­sel­ves some kind of pos­ter child.

  5. At first, I thought I was losing my mind with all your ‘siteual’ chan­ges. I seriously was begin­ning to think it was just me and some kind of LSD flash­back or something – LOL! Thank­fully you have men­tio­ned here, you have not had time to change your theme this week!

  6. johnNo Gravatar says:

    You know my posi­tion on China.

    I think you’re over thin­king the pedophile angle. I’d like to think there aren’t that many creeps out there.

    I for­give you for all your design chan­ges. Your ori­gi­nal design– the one you had when you first began was per­fect, yea I know it was at blog­ger and I didn’t read this at the time, but still it was nice.

    This is good, sim­ple and rea­da­ble. I don’t care, the chan­ges are enter­tai­ning. I doubt the way this blog looks is going to mat­ter the peo­ple who read it.

    At one time you pro­mi­sed me a zucchini, you may have to make good on that.

  7. DougNo Gravatar says:

    I won­der about the safety of flickr. How would the cre­tins find the chil­dren? It is pro­bably and sadly best that you not post pic­tu­res of the kids until you can ans­wer that ques­tion, though.

  8. robotmanNo Gravatar says:

    We don’t have that many youn­ger kids in my family any more. The older cou­sins have not had kids, and our family is pretty small. I do have a cou­ple of little kid cou­sins somewhere, I’ve never met them. I wouldn’t be pos­ting “little kid in bathing suit” pic­tu­res either, just because of the creeps out there.

    I think my sister’s kids will arrive already tat­ted and pierced.

    Just an afterthought.

  9. robotmanNo Gravatar says:

    What’s gro­wing in that gar­den any­way? I’m impressed.

    I don’t have a flickr account. Do you have frien­ded pics I need to sign up for?

    Sorry for the dou­ble com­ment I didn’t look at the vege­ta­bles until I wrote the first one.

  10. caseyNo Gravatar says:

    Nice to see you vege-ing out.

    Our Eco­nomy depends on China. That can be chan­ged but not without some work and it isn’t going to happen.

    They are put­ting on quite a front. I’m just as skep­ti­cal about it as you are.

    There are six kids in my imme­diate family. My youn­ger siblings are all past that really young age, but I feel the same way about having my twelve and ele­ven year old sis­ters pic­tu­res pos­ted anywhere.

  11. sauerkrautNo Gravatar says:

    John 11:22 is wrong about “over thin­king the pedophile angle” when pos­ting pic­tu­res of kids. The creeps are, indeed, out there. Many more than we’d like to think.

    It’s a con­ver­sa­tion I’ve had on occa­sion with a school prin­ci­pal or two. Espe­cially when they tell me I need to opt out in having pic­tu­res of the tykes pos­ted on the school web­site. I’ve held the line on the need for public schools to use only those pic­tu­res of chil­dren where parents have opted in to use them.

    It didn’t use to be this way. But then, back in the day, there was no inter­net and the pervs got their dirty pics from Larry Flynt. And we already know what Coo­per thinks about that dirty old bastard.

    meow.

  12. JasonNo Gravatar says:

    Pos­ting any photo invol­ving peo­ple invol­ves some level of risk, not just in terms of pre­da­tors but also other par­ti­ci­pants who may not want their pic­tu­res pos­ted. (I could, say, post quite a few pho­tos of exes, for ins­tance) Part of the rea­son I tend to only use pho­tos of myself invol­ves an immense fear of a law­suit for mis­re­pre­sen­ting indi­vi­duals, from situa­tions where rea­so­na­ble pri­vacy is expected.

    The writ­ten word is one thing. All narra­ti­ves are inter­pre­tive. But direct repro­duc­tions of any sort of image, taken even at pri­vate events, and espe­cially invol­ving minors, can put a blog­ger at risk, espe­cially if something happens.

    Con­sent forms come in handy.

    Lol. Can ya tell I’ve had to talk to attor­neys before. Never fun.

    Who’d a thunk it? Some peo­ple get upset about what I post about? :P

  13. cooperNo Gravatar says:

    inde: too bad about the vacuum.

    Yea, I know it seems unrea­so­na­ble I think part if it is that they are rela­ted to me.
    Goldy: Eh, I can take them or leave them. I not very mater­nal although I do like to boss peo­ple around. ;)

    mojo: That’s why I just let it go.

    jacob: Can’t say I blame you.

    poe­tress: yes I’m insane with
    the chan­ging them virus, or is it called lost iden­tity virus? Not sure.

    John: Well I’ll gladly post the kid­dies from your family on there then.

    Doug: I don’t sup­pose it’s all that safe, or any less safe than anything else really.

    Robot­man: Your afterthought is pro­bably very likely to be the case.

    Casey: I have a few pic­tu­res that are friends only, mostly blog fod­der they are not much dif­fe­rent than what is there except I’m naked in most of them.

    sauer­kraut: Yes I think he is wrong.

    Jason: I wouldn’t post pic­tu­res of others without there per­mis­sion — except Karl but of course I could get in trou­ble for that too as someone poin­ted out to me a long time ago.

    I hope you’ve not had to much occa­sion to see a lawyer.

  14. coyotemikeNo Gravatar says:

    You already know my fee­lings on kids and pedophi­les. (Superthanks for the link. I won­de­red where those extra peo­ple came from)

    As to China … I have an either/or theory on China. Either they are going to decide they need more elbow room and start taking over coun­tries all around them, which have no way of stop­ping them, or the country will fall apart as indi­vi­dual gene­rals with huge armies decide to become war­lords and create their own little fief­dom. Explo­sion or implo­sion. I just don’t know which is more likely.

  15. kellypeaNo Gravatar says:

    Come on, Coo­per. I’m liking the theme chan­ges. It makes me stop and think dif­fe­rently about what you have writ­ten for the day.

    And with res­pect to having chil­dren —  It wasn’t so much a pro­cess of thin­king of them as “something I wan­ted to have.” It was just time, I guess. But they’ve hel­ped me to be more serious about things I may not have con­si­de­red with regard to life. Things that affect many others.

    And I always won­der about those pic­tu­res on flickr as well…

  16. […] to pretty no.. inte­lli­gent, umm.. a ran­dom selec­tion of users.. you find a few gems along the way. Here’s one I saw today that com­bi­nes both — a great […]

  17. joegNo Gravatar says:

    I like sur­pri­ses, theme chan­ging doesn’t bother me as long as you keep wri­ting. This is good, clean and sim­ple. I like the archi­ves and the blog rolls on another page, other­wise you can kick that design all over the place I don’t mind.

    I like it when perio­di­cally you post something per­so­nal about your family even if it is only to call your brother a peacock.

    I’m torn on the issue of children’s pic­tu­res on the net, but I unders­tand having those con­cerns. I don’t think we should always be afraid but I unders­tand the need for caution.

  18. LeighNo Gravatar says:

    Well thank good­ness I’m not around to wit­ness all the theme chan­ges. But it also bums me out as well as I do miss your almost every­day thoughts :)

    I share your sen­ti­ments on the kid photos.

  19. cooperNo Gravatar says:

    kelly­pea: I’m glad because I am doing it espe­cially for you. I really don’t mind it when peo­ple change the­mes, but I think some peo­ple just like to be in a fami­liar place and the theme chan­ges dis­con­cert them.

    joe: Well, you have been here awhile, so if you didn’t like them you would be suf­fe­ring much.

    I am not so much afraid as I am repul­sed by the thought that some sicko could be jer­king off to a pic­ture of a child who was rela­ted to me, and it would be my fault.

    Leigh: If I go to your site and see more sur­fing pic­tu­res I’m going to cry anyway.

    I do have thoughts almost every day.

    When I figure out how to have thoughts daily I will be all set.

  20. LeighNo Gravatar says:

    Coop — I am in loooove… and not with my surf­boards ;) No tears will be shed as I have no surf pics this time my darling