Monday Mash

Something for you to be happy about.
I’m too busy to change my theme this week.

Lots of news posts about China and the media this week. A blog (China Rising) post by Tim John­son, the Bei­jing bureau chief for McC­latchy News­pa­pers really says it all.

Pres­sure on the foreign media

This whole “China is a great place to visit. We treat visi­tors and repor­ters well” is a bunch of rot­ten gra­pes, an Olym­pic smokescreen.

Do not turn your back on the kid who wants to steal your lollipop.

— —  —  —  — –

Mikey’s post briefly refe­ren­cing pedophi­lia just rein­for­ced some fee­lings I had yesterday.

My brother is currently lea­sing, with option to buy, my parent’s old house. All this while he deci­des whether he wants to com­mute to his down­town job or give it up and move clo­ser in. He hos­ted a fathers day event cau­sing rela­ti­ves from as far away as France and as close as twenty miles des­cend. He was like a pea­cock hos­ting his first “big peo­ple event”. If you ever read this Josh you are a pretty peacock — seriously.

There were a variety of fathers and future fathers and lots of little kids han­ging around pool. I heard these kids were rela­ted to me in some way. Many of the little ones I didn’t recog­nize right off. I’ve heard of them of course, maybe even seen them once or twice ran­domly through the years. Some are so young I had pre­viously only seen pho­tos. I like kids because they aren’t mine. I can play with them and leave, so it was all good. I have yet to arrive at the stage where I look at them as something I might want to have. I still look at chil­dren as me only youn­ger and bet­ter able to mani­pu­late them­sel­ves on a tram­po­line, or down the slide of the pool and all that.

I took a bunch of pic­tu­res of the kids pla­ying around in the pool and when I got back here last night was con­si­de­ring uploa­ding them to Flickr. The thought floa­ting back and forth was “can’t do that there are pedophi­les out there”. Con­si­de­ring half these kids tend to run around with their bathing suits falling off a good per­cent of the time (it’s here­di­tary) it just see­med best that I do not post pic­tu­res of them run­ning around in their tiger pat­ter­ned swim wear. It’s sad that I have to think that way, but I do.

Share This
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • SphereIt
  • Mixx
  • FriendFeed

20 Comments

  • I know how you feel — I am hesi­tant to use pho­tos I’ve found in which chil­dren are depic­ted. But I think if the pic­tu­res are anony­mous, there is pro­bably no problem.

    China is rising up to fill the vacuum we’ve of where we used to be.

  • I love kids… I am lucky that my brother has four of them so I can play with them ins­tead of having my own :)

    It’s funny, my wife’s best friend just had a daugh­ter and now she seems almost ready for her own.

  • Yeah, it’s always going to be a touchy sub­ject where kids are con­cer­ned. I know firsthand how much ire can be rai­sed when one tends to gloss over the sub­ject in one’s day-to-day affairs.

  • It’s unfor­tu­nate we have to think this way but the ways of the world make it neces­sary. I would be hesi­tant to put pic­tu­res of my son on the inter­net for a variety of rea­sons, at least until he is older.

    We send pic­tu­res back and forth to friends, but my wife doesn’t like the idea of them being pos­ted anywhere.

    It’s funny how all of a sud­den, pre Olym­pics, China wants to make them­sel­ves some kind of pos­ter child.

  • At first, I thought I was losing my mind with all your ‘siteual’ chan­ges. I seriously was begin­ning to think it was just me and some kind of LSD flash­back or something – LOL! Thank­fully you have men­tio­ned here, you have not had time to change your theme this week!

  • You know my posi­tion on China.

    I think you’re over thin­king the pedophile angle. I’d like to think there aren’t that many creeps out there.

    I for­give you for all your design chan­ges. Your ori­gi­nal design– the one you had when you first began was per­fect, yea I know it was at blog­ger and I didn’t read this at the time, but still it was nice.

    This is good, sim­ple and rea­da­ble. I don’t care, the chan­ges are enter­tai­ning. I doubt the way this blog looks is going to mat­ter the peo­ple who read it.

    At one time you pro­mi­sed me a zucchini, you may have to make good on that.

  • I won­der about the safety of flickr. How would the cre­tins find the chil­dren? It is pro­bably and sadly best that you not post pic­tu­res of the kids until you can ans­wer that ques­tion, though.

  • We don’t have that many youn­ger kids in my family any more. The older cou­sins have not had kids, and our family is pretty small. I do have a cou­ple of little kid cou­sins somewhere, I’ve never met them. I wouldn’t be pos­ting “little kid in bathing suit” pic­tu­res either, just because of the creeps out there.

    I think my sister’s kids will arrive already tat­ted and pierced.

    Just an afterthought.

  • What’s gro­wing in that gar­den any­way? I’m impressed.

    I don’t have a flickr account. Do you have frien­ded pics I need to sign up for?

    Sorry for the dou­ble com­ment I didn’t look at the vege­ta­bles until I wrote the first one.

  • Nice to see you vege-ing out.

    Our Eco­nomy depends on China. That can be chan­ged but not without some work and it isn’t going to happen.

    They are put­ting on quite a front. I’m just as skep­ti­cal about it as you are.

    There are six kids in my imme­diate family. My youn­ger siblings are all past that really young age, but I feel the same way about having my twelve and ele­ven year old sis­ters pic­tu­res pos­ted anywhere.

  • John 11:22 is wrong about “over thin­king the pedophile angle” when pos­ting pic­tu­res of kids. The creeps are, indeed, out there. Many more than we’d like to think.

    It’s a con­ver­sa­tion I’ve had on occa­sion with a school prin­ci­pal or two. Espe­cially when they tell me I need to opt out in having pic­tu­res of the tykes pos­ted on the school web­site. I’ve held the line on the need for public schools to use only those pic­tu­res of chil­dren where parents have opted in to use them.

    It didn’t use to be this way. But then, back in the day, there was no inter­net and the pervs got their dirty pics from Larry Flynt. And we already know what Coo­per thinks about that dirty old bastard.

    meow.

  • Pos­ting any photo invol­ving peo­ple invol­ves some level of risk, not just in terms of pre­da­tors but also other par­ti­ci­pants who may not want their pic­tu­res pos­ted. (I could, say, post quite a few pho­tos of exes, for ins­tance) Part of the rea­son I tend to only use pho­tos of myself invol­ves an immense fear of a law­suit for mis­re­pre­sen­ting indi­vi­duals, from situa­tions where rea­so­na­ble pri­vacy is expected.

    The writ­ten word is one thing. All narra­ti­ves are inter­pre­tive. But direct repro­duc­tions of any sort of image, taken even at pri­vate events, and espe­cially invol­ving minors, can put a blog­ger at risk, espe­cially if something happens.

    Con­sent forms come in handy.

    Lol. Can ya tell I’ve had to talk to attor­neys before. Never fun.

    Who’d a thunk it? Some peo­ple get upset about what I post about? :P

  • inde: too bad about the vacuum.

    Yea, I know it seems unrea­so­na­ble I think part if it is that they are rela­ted to me.
    Goldy: Eh, I can take them or leave them. I not very mater­nal although I do like to boss peo­ple around. ;)

    mojo: That’s why I just let it go.

    jacob: Can’t say I blame you.

    poe­tress: yes I’m insane with
    the chan­ging them virus, or is it called lost iden­tity virus? Not sure.

    John: Well I’ll gladly post the kid­dies from your family on there then.

    Doug: I don’t sup­pose it’s all that safe, or any less safe than anything else really.

    Robot­man: Your afterthought is pro­bably very likely to be the case.

    Casey: I have a few pic­tu­res that are friends only, mostly blog fod­der they are not much dif­fe­rent than what is there except I’m naked in most of them.

    sauer­kraut: Yes I think he is wrong.

    Jason: I wouldn’t post pic­tu­res of others without there per­mis­sion — except Karl but of course I could get in trou­ble for that too as someone poin­ted out to me a long time ago.

    I hope you’ve not had to much occa­sion to see a lawyer.

  • You already know my fee­lings on kids and pedophi­les. (Superthanks for the link. I won­de­red where those extra peo­ple came from)

    As to China … I have an either/or theory on China. Either they are going to decide they need more elbow room and start taking over coun­tries all around them, which have no way of stop­ping them, or the country will fall apart as indi­vi­dual gene­rals with huge armies decide to become war­lords and create their own little fief­dom. Explo­sion or implo­sion. I just don’t know which is more likely.

  • Come on, Coo­per. I’m liking the theme chan­ges. It makes me stop and think dif­fe­rently about what you have writ­ten for the day.

    And with res­pect to having chil­dren —  It wasn’t so much a pro­cess of thin­king of them as “something I wan­ted to have.” It was just time, I guess. But they’ve hel­ped me to be more serious about things I may not have con­si­de­red with regard to life. Things that affect many others.

    And I always won­der about those pic­tu­res on flickr as well…

  • […] to pretty no.. inte­lli­gent, umm.. a ran­dom selec­tion of users.. you find a few gems along the way. Here’s one I saw today that com­bi­nes both — a great […]

  • I like sur­pri­ses, theme chan­ging doesn’t bother me as long as you keep wri­ting. This is good, clean and sim­ple. I like the archi­ves and the blog rolls on another page, other­wise you can kick that design all over the place I don’t mind.

    I like it when perio­di­cally you post something per­so­nal about your family even if it is only to call your brother a peacock.

    I’m torn on the issue of children’s pic­tu­res on the net, but I unders­tand having those con­cerns. I don’t think we should always be afraid but I unders­tand the need for caution.

  • Well thank good­ness I’m not around to wit­ness all the theme chan­ges. But it also bums me out as well as I do miss your almost every­day thoughts :)

    I share your sen­ti­ments on the kid photos.

  • kelly­pea: I’m glad because I am doing it espe­cially for you. I really don’t mind it when peo­ple change the­mes, but I think some peo­ple just like to be in a fami­liar place and the theme chan­ges dis­con­cert them.

    joe: Well, you have been here awhile, so if you didn’t like them you would be suf­fe­ring much.

    I am not so much afraid as I am repul­sed by the thought that some sicko could be jer­king off to a pic­ture of a child who was rela­ted to me, and it would be my fault.

    Leigh: If I go to your site and see more sur­fing pic­tu­res I’m going to cry anyway.

    I do have thoughts almost every day.

    When I figure out how to have thoughts daily I will be all set.

  • Coop — I am in loooove… and not with my surf­boards ;) No tears will be shed as I have no surf pics this time my darling