cooper culture
Image 01

Opinion — Always Mine.….Paris, Obama and more.

May 20th, 2007 by cooper

From the desk of Oli­via Coo­per as the sounds of the mini-city are being sti­fled by a rather loud ren­di­tion of The Real Slim Shady. It is a Spa­nish ren­di­tion being sung to her by her cou­sin, a soon to be eigh­teen year old, who appa­rently thinks that Olivia’s apart­ment would be a nice place to hang out for the summer.

Barack Obama: Too much Paris Hil­ton, not enough Dar­fur cove­rage

“We see it in a media cul­ture that sen­sa­tio­na­li­zes the tri­vial and tri­via­li­zes the pro­found,” he said, “in a 24-hour news net­work bonanza that never fails to keep us pos­ted on how many days Paris Hil­ton will spend in jail but often fails to update us on the con­ti­nuing geno­cide in Dar­fur or the reco­very effort in New Orleans or the poverty that pla­gues too many Ame­ri­can streets.”

Good point of course, but “DUH” — I just want to scream no frig­gin sh – .

The whole thing is pos­ted at The Swamp/ link above.

Obama’s rhe­to­ric as usual is worth the read, at times it’s rive­ting, but it beco­mes less so in that it has been said before — many times.

When does all this rhe­to­ric get trans­la­ted into action? It’s not like most peo­ple aren’t aware that Paris is incon­se­quen­tial, so who is going to go after the media. Which poli­ti­cians are going to say don’t fea­ture me, fea­ture Dar­fur? I want a pre­si­dent who refu­ses to go on enter­tain­ment media. Who is going to step up in Dar­fur — it’s been four years Obama. Wai­ting for my gene­ra­tion is unacceptable.

Talk is cheap no mat­ter how good you are at it. Your voice sounds good, you are a rive­ting spea­ker, but I want my pre­si­dent to be pro-active, not afraid to take action where action is nee­ded. I want my pre­si­dent to ins­ti­gate chan­ges so that the wor­king poor are no lon­ger poor but wor­king insu­red and with a good chance of sen­ding their chil­dren to college. I want a pre­si­dent who knows that we all need an equal edu­ca­tion. A pre­si­dent who knows that the “Ame­ri­can Dream” is beco­ming impos­si­ble to achieve, and a pre­si­dent who is willing to make the calls that will make it pos­si­ble again.

I’d pre­fer a pre­si­dent who spends the two years prior to the elec­tion actually legis­la­ting ins­tead of campaigning.

I want a pre­si­dent who doesn’t buy into the Laws of Attrac­tion.

eh — we do love our Paris Hilton’s though. I’ve never really got­ten that. Guess it’s because I mis­sed the video.

— —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  —  — –

Inte­res­ting Case in Mary­land which will cause much bio-ethical debate for sure, an appe­llate court in Mary­land issued a 4 – 3 ruling which allows tech­ni­cally for there to be no mother in the case of a surro­gate.


Ruling alters idea of mother

Md. high court finds pater­nity laws must apply equally to men and women. This type of law has been in place for males but this dec­la­res the issue gen­der neu­tral, but it rai­ses some bio-ethical con­cerns for many. Chil­dren bar­gai­ned for and made even with all good inten­tions could end up parent less, at least if I am rea­ding this correctly.

I have mixed fee­lings, but cer­tainly as we head into a world where parents will be able to choose their child’s sex and maybe even their IQ we have got to start thin­king about this.

I’m going to follow this one over the next few weeks as I’m sure there will be much dis­cus­sion on this.

Share This
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • FriendFeed
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks

27 Responses to “Opinion — Always Mine.….Paris, Obama and more.”

  1. piaNo Gravatar says:

    Coo­per I’m at a loss about surro­gacy and the lar­ger issue of pater­nal rights.

    There is a big pro­blem when a woman deci­des on an abor­tion and the man tries to block it. This hap­pe­ned in the 80’s often

    Got a 404 error when trying to read the link, and haven’t had time to read today’s paper or rather never finished the front page

    It’s scary to think that parents could deter­mine so much.

    At the same time there’s a move­ment to stop women from having abor­tions when the amnio shows Down Syndrome.

    I’m sorry but the costs to the family them­sel­ves and society in gene­ral could be very high if that happens.

    Your gene­ra­tion is going to have deal with so much and this will be as big as glo­bal war­ming, in its own way as it deter­mi­nes so much about fami­lial makeup

  2. I’d pre­fer a pre­si­dent who spends the two years prior to the elec­tion actually legis­la­ting ins­tead of campaigning.

    My dear naive Olivia,

    A politician’s job is to get elected-legislation only occurs if it will help them get re-elected.

    Just watched Mr. Smith Goes to Washing­ton with Jimmy Stewart-it is a good documentary.

    Humbly Yours,
    DannyJ

  3. cooperNo Gravatar says:

    Danny: I am young not naive.
    Well, pos­sibly somewhat naive. I am well aware of the chan­ces of what I want to be is never going to be. It is all an “id the sce­na­rio were ideal” kind of thing. It does not mean I can’t use (what I want) to base (what I think) of whiche­ver old can­di­date is vying for a posi­tion I ulti­ma­tely pay for…or sadly don’t pay for as most poli­ti­cal can­di­da­tes are bought. Yes I do know this.

    pia: I fixed the link. It’s something worth follo­wing, although my area of inte­rest is not bio-ethics I think rulings such as thins are inte­res­ting in light of what it could mean for some child. Born to no parents…no one clai­ming them.
    I’m cer­tain it would be rare but to allow for it..I don’t know.…

  4. At this point I’d settle for being able to say something about a can­di­date that rings bet­ter than, “he’s the best we’re gonna get.” And maybe Barack does have more going for him than that, but that’s mainly what I see. The fact that he’s pas­sio­nate and elo­quent doesn’t really count there as far as I’m con­cer­ned. If a poli­ti­cian isn’t pas­sio­nate he shouldn’t be in the game, and if he isn’t elo­quent he needs a fami­liar name and a cabal of rich sup­por­ters to win at it.

    Damn rea­lity…

  5. You’re right, it has all been said before. I know I’ve men­tio­ned it already, but Nor­man Corwin’s book “Tri­via­li­zing Ame­rica” (1983) is a bri­lliant analy­sis of the trend. Unfor­tu­na­tely the only pre­dic­tions of his that didn’t come true are the opti­mis­tic, hope­ful ones. E.g. 24 hour news was com­ple­tely new then, and his hope was that by spe­cia­li­zing on news, these sta­tions might have tur­ned that trend around.

    I think the idea of choo­sing IQ is non­sense. There are so many fac­tors besi­des gene­tics that go into the making of a mind, not to men­tion the inte­rac­tion of the unborn child with the body of the mother, there will pro­bably be a lot of disap­point­ment and even law­suits (Where’s my wunderkind?).

  6. C~

    Yes, I know you aren’t naive, I guess the sar­cas­tic tone didn’t trans­late well through the electrons…

  7. jacobNo Gravatar says:

    “I’d pre­fer a pre­si­dent who spends the two years prior to the elec­tion actually legis­la­ting ins­tead of campaigning.”

    That would be a coup.

    Funny that case in Mary­land skip­ped by the lower courts, it makes sense to make the situa­tion gen­der neu­tral. the whole thing does have some scary impli­ca­tions — as rare as they might be.

  8. o ceallaighNo Gravatar says:

    Coo­per, most peo­ple in these Uni­ted Sta­tes would not agree with the sta­te­ment that Paris Hil­ton is incon­se­quen­tial. Espe­cially not the media moguls. They go where the pro­fit is. If Dar­fur was pro­fi­ta­ble, we’d hear of nothing else.

    But Dar­fur is a synonym for ban­kruptcy, and the media and the poli­ti­cians know this well. No. Paris Hil­ton is pro­fi­ta­ble. And Ame­ri­can Idol, and Dan­cing with the Stars. You might get a sound bite out of Dar­fur, or the gar­bage dump pic­kers of Gua­te­mala, or His­pa­nic migrant wor­kers, if it will raise an eye­brow on the Paris Hil­ton crowd long enough for them to get the idea that Can­di­date X has com­pas­sion. But he bet­ter not actually talk “action”, because then We the Peo­ple might have to turn off Paris Hil­ton and do something. And We can for­get that.

    Yes, you’ve heard this before from me. Don’t blame “them” for doing exactly what We tell them to. See “tra­gedy of the commons”.

    I don’t wish to go where the Mary­land courts are taking us until we’re a whole lot bet­ter at cyber­ne­tics. Will the real R Daneel Oliwa please stand up … (take that, M&M ;) ).

  9. caseyNo Gravatar says:

    Obama has the advan­tage in the spea­king depart­ment.
    I don’t know who is the best can­di­date at this point. I agree all the “wish for” thoughts would be nice, but highly unlikely.

    That ruling is what I call fair, (con­si­de­ring the situa­tion as it applied to males — making it gen­der equal and all) but it is freaky if you look at the possibilities.

  10. cooperNo Gravatar says:

    Inde:
    I am glad you are back. It’s alright to go away of course — how sel­fish of me.
    You are always help­ful in sug­ges­ting books I other­wise would pro­bably not read.

    Danny: I am a tad sen­si­tive to being called naive as I don’t feel so. I also know you haven’t read me long enough to know if I am naive or not. I’m sure a per­cent of the peo­ple who read this regu­larly think of me as naive any­way I pre­fer to call it idealistic.

    Sar­casm — a hard one online.

    I don’t offend easily so even if you did mean to call me naive it would not have bothe­red me I would just coun­ter it with my opi­nion on the subject. ;)

    jacob: A Coup is right.

    OC: I know we have cove­red this before. I know

    it’s pro­fi­ta­ble but I think on some level peo­ple watch that stuff because they can’t face rea­lity. Kno­wing she is incon­se­quen­tial ( which I believe most peo­ple do 0 doesn’t mat­ter because watching reports on Hil­ton are easier than watching real news.

    casey: Good Ole Maryland.

  11. coyotemikeNo Gravatar says:

    Your ears have my pity re: pre-18 cousin.

    The rea­son it has to be said over and over again, is because nobody is making a change. And it isn’t going to change. Tal­king about Paris gets higher ratings, which turns into adver­ti­sing dollars. What makes even less sense is, since there are cable chan­nels devo­ted to cele­bri­ties, why can’t the peo­ple inte­res­ted in such things just go watch those, and leave the rest of us alone (the same applies to sports, in my opi­nion, but that is a sepe­rate issue).

    My dad came up with an inte­res­ting idea: turn the pre­si­dency into a sin­gle 6-year term, no re-elections. Then every pre­si­dent is a lame duck, and doesn’t have to work on get­ting ree­lec­ted. They can just do the job they are meant to do. I doubt it is a rea­lis­tic solu­tion, but it has some potential.

    I read that article on the pater­nity laws. I am all for gen­der neu­tra­lity in ALL laws. But I can see how that could cause some pro­blems, like one of your other rea­ders brought up, when a man may want a child that a woman doesn’t want to carry to term. That would effec­tivly again take con­trol of a woman’s body away from her. I think the solu­tion would have to be full ges­ta­tio­nal tech­no­logy: a baby incu­ba­tor that goes from fer­ti­li­za­tion to birth.

  12. GNo Gravatar says:

    You could rename this “Oli­via Opi­nes” now that you have published your name.

    All poli­ti­cians are the same in my book, they may have dif­fe­rent ideo­lo­gies, but until one pro­ves me wrong poli­ti­cians, are peo­ple who say what they must to get elected.

    If they do anything worthwhile for the peo­ple after­ward is just luck or chance.

  13. DougNo Gravatar says:

    The last thing I care about from any poli­ti­cian is their posi­tion on the media. It’s the one part of life, besi­des reli­gion, that’s cons­ti­tu­tio­nally none of their damn busi­ness and yet what they want to talk about. The second-to-last thing I want to hear from any poli­ti­cian is what’s pain­fully obvious (as you said) into­ned as a serious stand. It really didn’t take Obama long to become one of them.

    As for you, Ms. Olivia/Alice/Tricia/Cooper, you do rea­lize you’re now the T.S. Garp of the internet?

  14. cooperNo Gravatar says:

    coyote: She is actually pretty cool, and easy to be around and thank­fully she is smart and as she is fluent in Spa­nish being of Cuban des­cent she helps me keep that up. I let her stay the night; it will not become a habit. She lea­ves for college in less than three months and is emplo­yed and her boy­friend in home for the sum­mer so I do not feel it will be that bad. I’ve not seen her very mucho­ver the least seve­ral years or my life for that mat­ter so it’s not that bad.

    Talk very sel­dom means action. I just want action, and I wish they would but­ton their lips until that time.

    On the bio-ethics, it will be inte­res­ting to follow the story. I see a horror/ sci-fi / melo­drama in the making.

    G: yea, I agree so there is no where to go here.

    Doug: Yes I know your views, oh.…didn’t I get my views from you?????????

    Funny I thought I was “Alice” .

    Either is bet­ter than Hum­bert Hum­bert, so what can I say.

  15. piaNo Gravatar says:

    Like the new look and the use of the name Oli­via, which I have seen you use before along with all the rest

    Can’t see most of the com­ments but can see your answers

    When I say your gene­ra­tion I mean it spe­ci­fi­cally on ques­tions such as neu­ro­bio­lo­gi­cal because your gene­ra­tion will be hit with both the per­so­nal deci­sions and the lar­ger ones

    About poli­tics I think we all have a res­pon­si­bi­lity, and are all fai­ling. Don’t like the way Barack sepa­ra­tes him­self from baby boo­mers. Tech­ni­cally is – he’s at the tail end, the peo­ple he is trying to dis­tance him­self from – Hil and Bill are at the beginning

    But that’s just seman­tics and no pre­si­den­tial can­di­date will go to real issues because it just isn’t sexy

  16. robotmanNo Gravatar says:

    You got it, talk is cheap, “we the peo­ple” are Cheap. I don’t know why ever­yone uses words to deter­mine who might be the bet­ter can­di­date. There needs to be a bet­ter lit­mus test.

    Paris: incon­se­quen­tial and too skinny.

  17. cooperNo Gravatar says:

    Pia: Is is because the fonts are too pale?

    I can see them but want to know if others are having
    a hard time.

    The old tem­pla­tes second side­bar stop­ped wor­king in IE so I am loo­king around fro something simple.

    Actually no one calls me Oli­via except my mother, and a few ran­dom rela­ti­ves, it’s Tri­cia most often but I’m used to being called coo­per more than anything else.

    Maybe we should just pick the sexiest can­di­date, we couldn’t do much worse.

    Dane: You’re robot­man again?

    She does look ano­re­xic at times.

  18. DougNo Gravatar says:

    Coo­per, throw around the name Hum­bert Hum­bert here and see how many hands go up. You’re funny.

  19. ChrisNo Gravatar says:

    It’s always inte­res­ting to see the views on Obama. I would say he’s a pretty genuine guy, but I’m a little bia­sed I would think.

    Action on Dar­fur is way over due. But it’s like Pia said, it just isn’t sexy. It’s sad, but true.

    Now spea­king of sexy, Paris Hil­ton sure isn’t either.

  20. cooperNo Gravatar says:

    Chris: In gene­ral it is my view on most poli­ti­cal
    can­di­da­tes not just Obama. That article just hap­pe­ned to strike me,and because his rhe­to­ric is at times rive­ting I nee­ded to express my views on rhe­to­ric ver­sus the results or at least the action. He may be the best of them at this point. I am not convinced.

  21. ShaynaNo Gravatar says:

    I am about to fall asleep… but I wan­ted to come by and say “hey” and my good­ness every time I stop by this place has a dif­fe­rent look… I can never tell if I am in Won­der­land or Not! ;)

  22. ChrisNo Gravatar says:

    No need to be con­vin­ced just yet. There’s still plenty of time to make a deci­sion. Just kno­wing that you’re not voting for Bush is enough to make me res­pect you even more ;)

  23. sauerkrautNo Gravatar says:

    Obama loo­ked so much bet­ter kic­king Brad Berenson’s neo­con­ser­va­tive ass in the battle for law review edi­tor. He’s losing his glit­ter with all this “we gotta with­draw” mumbo-jumbo without thin­king about the con­se­quen­ces of that act. Bad enough the chimp in the oval office got us there in the first place.

    As for paris, she’s a rank skank who holds my inte­rest about as much as that pos­sum thun­king around under my exhaust mani­flow. Yeah, I know. I ain’t sup­po­sed to look. …

  24. […] Grier; MyiPhone; Slash Gear; Lucky Lils’ Artic­les Hub; Terra Guru; Whi­tehou­ser; Won­der­lan­dor­not; MacIn­tosh; Meta­bog­gle; The Silly Point; The Median Sib; The Digi­tal Move­ment; CEO Smack; Tours CMS; […]

  25. This one makes sence “One’s first step in wis­dom is to kuess­tion everything — and one’s last is to come to terms with everything.”