From my blog to god’s eyes — half naked Monday morning.

A few Sun­day Mon­day mor­ning notes and then I’m going to relax and scroll the blogs.

Doug, of Waking Ambrose fame, is the guest on the Music High­way pro­ject this week. You can see his pic­ture on my side­bar so go take a look; he also has done him­self proud at the Pratt­ler.

I say, Doug for President.

I am so impa­tient for my turn at the music highway.…just to see my name in lights. Yea, I’m that way.

There were a lot of car­ni­vals this wee­kend. Mar­ce­lla lists them so go check them out.

Saw Dylan last night in his stop here on his tour of minor lea­gue base­ball sta­diums. I’ve seen him before but really was una­ware that he would be within wal­king dis­tance of my apart­ment until later last week when John infor­med me and offe­red up a tic­ket. I got their late, but before Dylan actually hit the stage, and they con­fis­ca­ted my camera… seriously a female secu­rity guard pat­ted me down.

I had fun though and I was glad I did not drive as the traf­fic was horren­dous. I actually wal­ked and after­wards we all wal­ked into town and hung out at a bar all night wai­ting for the traf­fic to disap­pear so John and the others could go retrieve the car from the par­king lot.

Funny how the exi­te­ment around seeing anyone in NY is so…not there…but out here an hour from two major cities, des­pite the fact that most of these peo­ple tra­vel to these cities for work,  the exi­te­ment and anti­ci­pa­tion was real, and pal­pa­ble, and the peo­ple were much more appreciative.

Maybe blogs are more mains­tream than I pre­viously gave them cre­dit for.

From Your Blog to God’s Ears

Have blogs become part of the mains­tream? Con­si­der the evi­dence of a front-page story in Saturday’s New York Times, which reports on reac­tion to the fede­ral court ruling that the NSA wire­tap­ping pro­gram is ille­gal. The first three legal experts quo­ted are blog­gers; two of the quo­tes are from the blogs, one appears to be from an inter­view with a lawyer-blogger. Stop wri­ting those law review artic­les, legal scho­lars, and get thee to Blogger.

Emily had a hot pic­ture pos­ted this week. Yes go ahead and call me a clo­set les­bian all you want, I know when something looks quite nice male or female.

There may be a  “blog to gods ears” things going on, I assume it inc­lu­des the eyes of the deity as well, but  I’m gonna run with my quar­ter naked Sun­day eve­ning stuff anyhoo and assume god isn’t mes­sing with a com­pu­ter loo­king through blogs like ever­yone else in the free world. My half naked con­tri­bu­tion is on the side­bar for now.

I’m sure I’ll post something of sig­ni­fi­cance somewhere on the web this week.

Keep searching. 

Aden­dum: I have two post at taking place currently. Ree­mer­gence of com­mom sense in Ohio and a Ques­tion about Eeducation. 

Share This
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • SphereIt
  • Mixx
  • FriendFeed

16 Comments

  • I’m sure you’ll post something of sig­ni­fi­cance soo­ner than me, Miss Cooper.

    I swear, one of the years I’ll write something that truly means something.

  • Very intri­guing faux naked­ness.
    Doug always wri­tes well, but I think he is bar­king up the wrong tree with Lieberman.

  • I’m trying to catch up on all the blog postings.

    Of course your blog is more impor­tant thatn you know.

    Love the half naked quar­ter naked flash.

    Dylan=good stuff.

  • mojo: your sto­ries last fore­ver ran­dom com­men­tary on the state of society or my life are sig­ni­fi­cant for a mere moment.

    weirsdo: well inlike some bar­bies I pre­fer faux.
    I kind of like his tree in this case.

    jacob: It will be impos­si­ble. I was not on vaca­tion and could not keep up with them.

  • Yeah, i’m loving seeing all these cool blog­gers on The Pro­ject and what ins­pi­res them to be the kind of per­son that they are.… And I’m really wai­ting for your turn.

    Oh, and as far as I know, even the hete­ro­se­xual girls all know that that female form is vastly supe­rior to the male form. That’s just science.

  • Read your post and had to laugh… 12 ? Hardly but then again, you’re 21 and it
    doesn’t seem you even read any of the posts just loo­ked @ the layout. Shame, I
    was hoping for cons­truc­tive criticism. .…

  • actually it was cons­truc­tive cri­ti­cism, but it’s funny you should come to my blog and post about it as it really has nothing to do with this blog, email would have been more approriate.

    Dyn­grous may be your name but it is how many middle schoo­lers type thin­king it is cute, … most adults and college stu­dents with any sense would skip by your blog for that rea­son. I mean there are thou­sands of blogs to read out there.

    The design wouldn’t lure them to read either as it is stan­dard. That is pretty constructive.

    To eva­luate the con­tent of a blog which appears ideo­lo­gi­cally oppo­site of mine really wouldn’t make sense as if there is rea­dership for what you are saying then they will find you; they would find you soo­ner if the blog was more indi­vi­dua­li­zed or if that dayngr word wasn’t there.
    The con­tent didn’t inte­rest me but it could easily inte­rest others which is why I did not com­ment on your content.

  • Thanks, Alice. Weirsdo and I agree on the cle­ver­ness of your pho­to­graphy. I would add oo-ee. I think I might run as an inde­pen­dent for town dog­catcher. I’m thin­king a hard­line libertarian/national-security plat­form. Want to be cam­paign manager?

    Weirsdo, just to make sure we’re clear, what I’m endor­sing is someone the Repu­bli­cans and Democ­rats don’t like.

  • I’ve read the music pro­ject and it is entertaining.

    Can’t wait to read yours.

    I’m hea­ding over to read your taking place posts.

    Inte­res­ting pic­tu­res i see they are tit­les quar­ter naked sun­day — so you.

  • Dang… I SWEAR… I keep rea­ding ever­yo­nes blog and I SWEAR I have com­men­ted… and when I go back to read the blog again… I obviously DID NOT! I think I am going crazy… or I have a great ima­gi­na­tion… ima­gi­ning I have typed the com­ments out… Geez, I am rambling…

    LOL! I sup­pose you’ll just have to wait until Decem­ber before your light will shine… LOL! :) :) :)

    I would vote for the DAWG…

    and YES… Emily’s itzy bitzy bikini pic was very Hot!!! :)

  • Nice knees.

    I’ll read the rest later I’m unpac­king now but the Emily is hot.

  • Nice knees coop.

    Quar­ter naked is safer I guess.

    What hap­pe­ned to that photo jour­nal you remo­ved after someone copied it way back? I thought you were even­tually going to reins­ti­tute int at another location.

  • You always post something of sig­ni­fi­cance, except when you don’t

    I’m back and back in love with NY. How could I ever have thought.…?

    Mains­tream? If I go mains­tream could you vir­tually shoot me – or really

  • Oh right. Yes, Doug for pre­si­dent for sure

    And I can’t wait to see your name in lights. Love it also :-) Obviously

  • Doug: Oh. You mean Schlesinger.

  • I could have sworn I had aons­we­red these comments.

    Doug: i think I could be a kic­kass dog­cath­cer cam­paign manager.

    joe: um ya.

    shayna: you and me both. crazy that is.
    ego: emily is a les­bian and so out of your reach.… ha ha not out of mine however…

    jake: yeah i have it only half the pic­ture have to be wor­ked with to make them it so they can’t be copied and I’m too lazy to do it.

    pia: ever­yone either posts something sig­ni­fi­cant or doesn’t…it is fairly subjective.

    weirsdo: in that case I am not sure I can vote for him for anything.….….even dog catcher.…;(