Duke Lacrosse, and more Pig Crap.

This has peen pos­ted on seve­ral other sites inc­lu­ding Abyss2Hope and Justice4twosisters ‚   and I’m sure a few others inc­lu­ding Talk Left — where they appear to be having some group orgasm over it on a daily basis.  I am going to post it here any­way because I have been doing it all along no sense to stop now.

The follo­wing is my inter­pre­ta­tion  of Richard H. Brodhead’s res­ponse to a let­ter addres­sed to the board of trus­tees con­cer­ning the uni­ver­si­ties hand­ling of the Duke Lac­rosse alle­ged rape case.

The real let­ter and a link to it will follow. 

I guess a group of peo­ple got together to let the school know they were dis­sa­tis­fied with the way things were hand­led in regard to these poor boys and the poor vic­ti­mi­zed lac­rosse team. 

These peo­ple — “Friends of Duke Uni­ver­sity ” — can’t grasp the con­cept that jus­tice for all means jus­tice for all and that these boys have to go through th sys­tem because they have been char­ged with a crime.

I think this let­ter, even though I’m sure it was sin­cere and I ‘m sure the board of trus­tees hope nothing more than for the boys to be found not guilty, is suc­cinct and to the point.

My  inter­pre­ta­tion of the the res­ponse first :

yea yea, yea I hear ya. I hope they are not guilty too and feel your pain, but the fact is they were total creepy assho­les and sha­med our school, not to men­tion may have com­mit­ted and horri­ble crime, and now dear parents and friends of Duke Lac­rosse we have to wait and see what happens.

The media is twis­ting is all around and we don’t know what end is up.

Please hear this though.…BUT FOR THE FACT that those boys had a party, (one of many throughout the year des­pite war­nings), a his­tory of bad and indi­vi­dually cri­mi­nal( although pre­viously unpro­seuc­ted behavior),hired strip­pers, got drunk, and hur­led racial epi­taphs and pos­sibly com­mit­ted a very serious crime of rape and god knows what else,none of this would be occu­rring; the­re­fore,  would you all please shut the fuck up and let the sys­tem do it’s job.

Again I say, and not for the last time I’m cer­tain, you can’t play in a pig pen without get­ting pig crap on your shoes and pig crap is hard to get off. Some­ti­mes it takes years, maybe years spent in jail maybe not but it will at least teach you to stay out of pig pens.

The offi­cal res­ponse follows via this a link or you can read more to read it. Let­ter To Duke Uni­ver­sity Board Of Trus­tees Recei­ves Response


Dear Friends: I thank you for sen­ding me a copy of the open let­ter that you published in the Duke Chronicle.

You say that you write not to cri­ti­cize, but to offer sup­port. I take you at your word for that, and I thank you. I well unders­tand that in rai­sing ques­tions of such serious­ness, you are demons­tra­ting your con­cern for the Uni­ver­sity and the desire to make it better.

In a situa­tion as com­plex as the one we’ve been grap­pling with, where power­ful pas­sions have coe­xis­ted with rapidly chan­ging “facts” and where action has been requi­red in the face of deep uncer­tainty, it was vir­tually ine­vi­ta­ble that the Uni­ver­sity res­ponse would be open to ques­tion. It won’t sur­prise you to learn that I have recei­ved cri­ti­cal com­ments from a great variety of points of view, inc­lu­ding dia­me­tri­cally oppo­site ones. I accept that, and would only say that those of us in posi­tions of res­pon­si­bi­lity have acted as best we could to make two points: that what the pla­yers were accu­sed of was, if true, a hei­nous act; and that it would be equally unjust to pre­judge their guilt in the absence of proof and certainty.

This dual mes­sage has been at the heart of vir­tually every public sta­te­ment I have made on the case. I won’t res­pond point by point to your mes­sage but do want to speak to two issues that you raise. You say that “at this point, no fair-minded per­son could any lon­ger believe that a rape occu­rred” and, accor­dingly, you chide the Uni­ver­sity for not sup­por­ting the pla­yers more aggres­si­vely. But as you your­self recog­nize, “the uni­ver­sity can express no opi­nion about the ulti­mate out­come of pen­ding legal matters.”

I am well aware that, after many weeks of media sto­ries that made it seem almost self-evidently true that a rape had occu­rred, recent sto­ries have offe­red exten­sive evi­dence exo­ne­ra­ting the indic­ted stu­dents and ques­tio­ning the legi­ti­macy of the case. But the Uni­ver­sity does not have direct access to the full truth of the case now any more than we did ear­lier, and we can’t speak with cer­tainty of mat­ters that only the cri­mi­nal jus­tice sys­tem can resolve. We are eager for our stu­dents to be pro­ved innocent.

We share the wish for a speedy reso­lu­tion of all the mat­ters that are now in doubt. In my June 5 com­mu­nity sta­te­ment I spoke of the ordeal our team mem­bers have lived through – a pain­ful, costly expe­rience for them­sel­ves, their fami­lies, and the com­mu­nity as a whole. I also rei­te­ra­ted that if the indic­ted stu­dents are the objects of a false accu­sa­tion, they are the objects of an injus­tice as grave as the one they have been accu­sed of.

But as you recog­nize, the Uni­ver­sity can’t go the further step and proc­laim our cer­tainty of their inno­cence. That requi­res reso­lu­tion through the legal sys­tem – which is all the more rea­son why we require the legal sys­tem to pro­ceed in a fair-minded, even-handed, and speedy fashion. You also voice the per­cep­tion that the Uni­ver­sity has been com­pli­cit in sca­pe­goa­ting mem­bers of the lac­rosse team. I recog­nize the gra­vity of the charge, but I do not agree with it. It was the party that the men’s lac­rosse team held on the night of March 13 that pre­ci­pi­ta­ted the sub­se­quent ava­lanche of publi­city and noto­riety. In our sta­te­ments, the Uni­ver­sity has been con­sis­tently cri­ti­cal of the team’s con­duct on that night (while taking scru­pu­lous pains to dis­tin­guish bet­ween the ack­now­led­ged con­duct and the felony char­ges, which have not been established).

But we have not con­fi­ned our cen­sure to this one team. The Cam­pus Cul­ture Ini­tia­tive out­li­ned in my April 5 sta­te­ment recog­ni­zes that the underl­ying issues are per­va­sive in under­gra­duate cul­ture, and not just at Duke. In coming weeks we’ll be wor­king to pro­mote res­pon­si­ble con­duct among all stu­dents: on the men’s lac­rosse team to be sure, but also throughout the Duke stu­dent body. Meanwhile, it was a report the admi­nis­tra­tion com­mis­sio­ned, the Cole­man Report, that gave tes­ti­mony to the posi­tive dimen­sions of the lac­rosse team’s history.

I recog­nize the anguish in your let­ter. I am not sur­pri­sed by it: we are living through an unu­sually pain­ful and cha­llen­ging situa­tion. But in my view, the way to heal this anguish is not to go back and end­lessly debate things peo­ple should have done in the past.

It’s to move for­ward – to a just and speedy reso­lu­tion of the court case, to a proud new future for the men’s lac­rosse team, and to an era of inc­rea­sed res­pon­si­bi­lity and res­pect among Duke stu­dents in gene­ral. I look for­ward to wor­king with you and all other friends of Duke to achieve these goals.

Best wishes,

Richard H. Brodhead President

Share This
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • SphereIt
  • Mixx
  • FriendFeed

6 Comments

  • Some peo­ple are never going to be happy no mat­ter the result. It’s the nature of the game. I’d almost rather see the whole thing put behind us as well. Far too much media time has been taken away from weigh­tier social con­cerns to cover what is, essen­tially, a local legal issue.

  • it is a weighty social issue, pro­bably more sig­ni­fi­cant than a lot of things the media cover. They’re just cove­ring it wrong.
    The rami­fi­ca­tions , both racial and sexual, of the case are natio­nal no mat­ter how you look at it.

  • Your sum­mary is good, but mis­sed the point where Dick said, “No one can sue Duke because we are being res­pon­si­ble by set­ting up a pro­gram to edu­cate our stu­dents not to party like ani­mals, which by the way hap­pens everywhere, so what could we have done?”

  • That’s pretty damn close to exactly what he was saying. Inc­lu­sive of the ” no one can sue us” addition.

    I think it brings up valid social con­cerns almost social emr­gen­cies.
    The media sucks in their spi­ri­ted quest for ratings.

  • I’d almost rather see the whole thing put behind us as well

    Well, that’s easy done. Kill your tele­vi­sion. Stop buying anything from media out­lets and their adver­ti­sers that exploit this and rela­ted issues for ratings. Boy­cott ALL scho­larship ath­le­tics EVERYWHERE and make sure your friends do too.

    And be sure to carry your mirror around with you. Make sure that that face you’re cur­sing is not in fact your own.

  • I still say that sports and college should not be inter­mi­xed. When a stu­dent goes to college to play a sport, then it is point­less for them to attend class, and if they come to college to attend clas­ses, then they really don’t have enough time to worry about how the sports team is doing. The argu­ment that sports bring so much money into the college is point­less, as it all goes right back into the ath­le­tic pro­gram. As a college ins­truc­tor, I would be per­so­nally thri­lled to never have to make a secon­dary sche­dule to acco­mo­date the stu­dent ath­le­tes, or have to explain to a stu­dent that while their absen­ses count against them, the ones for the ath­le­tes don’t.

    I don’t know why stu­dent ath­le­tes have become spe­cial cases. If it has just been a nor­mal Duke stu­dent who was char­ged, would they have gar­ne­red the nation­wide defence that the lac­rosse team has got­ten? Would the case have got­ten natio­nal cove­rage? Would that student’s advi­sor been held accoun­ta­ble for his actions? Yes, the coach should have had con­trol of his team, but he didn’t rape the woman.

    How many thou­sands of women are raped per year whose sto­ries are never told?