My dreadlock contribution.….….….politics of black hair and cultural appropriation

I was 16/17, hard to remem­ber which, and did it to be cool.

Why not, I could.

I heard nothing, or at least not much, of cul­tu­ral appro­pria­tion at that time. Though I’d had a minor les­son in it from my best friend in second grade, of indi­ge­nous abo­ri­gi­nal des­cent she put in in my place once or twice even a 6. The les­son was monior ony because I was not quite old enough to grasp it fully at the time.

I ven­ture to guess that not many white teens gave it much thought.To me it meant simply that I was uber cool and I didn’t really care for the un hip babushka, part of my Austrian/Polish/Hugarian heri­tage and my India, Per­sian side had never been fully explo­red due to the fact that my great greats on that side were both orphans in the truest sense.

The clo­sest I came at that time to even get­ting a hint that there was something wrong with me in dread­locks, something that had very little to do with how they loo­ked (which was kind of ridi­cu­lous), was my father saying “coo­per that’s an awful thing to do”, and when I asked why (assu­ming he had mis­pla­ced his uber libe­ral cool­ness) he said “quite frankly because you are not black”. He said “think about it, I shouldn’t have to explain it to you”.

My father ten­ded to think his kids were smart and would figure things out for them­sel­ves and I did not go on to inves­ti­gate that con­ver­sa­tion any further at that point in time. My black friends didn’t say anything good or bad, that may have been a big hint I mis­sed.
None of my white friends thought they were anything but cool.What the hair meant to me was nothing, what it meant to black peo­ple and what my wea­ring it meant never ente­red my mind at that time.

I wouldn’t wear dread­locks now if you paid me, maybe because I unders­tand why I shouldn’t. At least I think I unders­tand.
It was the dis­course that comes from aca­de­mic course work that hel­ped me unders­tand finally for good the thing my father was saying back in the day. It was the same thing my friend told me in 2nd grade, at least in some way. She told me I “couldn’t be an abo­ri­gi­nal native for a cos­tume event because I wasn’t an abo­ri­gi­nal native”. I cried, and my mother said the same thing to me then as my father said to me years later. She said it in sim­pler form, she said my friend was right. We moved on. I guess it is easier to leave small seeds when it comes to second graders.

In the mode of Doug’s Waking Ambrose

 Wiki Cul­tu­ral Appropriation:

Cul­tu­ral appro­pria­tion is the adop­tion of some spe­ci­fic ele­ments of one cul­ture by a dif­fe­rent cul­tu­ral group. It deno­tes “Accul­tu­ra­tion” but often con­no­tes a nega­tive view towards accul­tu­ra­tion from a mino­rity cul­ture by a domi­nant cul­ture. It can inc­lude the intro­duc­tion of forms of dress or per­so­nal adorn­ment, music and art, reli­gion, or social beha­vior. indi­ge­nous cul­tu­ral con­texts, may take on mea­nings that are sig­ni­fi­cantly diver­gent from, or merely less nuan­ced than, those they ori­gi­nally held. Or, they may be strip­ped of mea­ning altogether.

There is a natu­ral human ten­dency to mimic, adopt and adapt tools and beha­viors which are admi­red, valued, or con­si­de­red use­ful. But when a domi­nant or favo­red group copies and begins to assi­mi­late cer­tain cul­tu­ral aspects of another group while mar­gi­na­li­zing, rejec­ting, oppres­sing, or other­wise deva­luing the peo­ple whose cul­ture they covet, resent­ment and some­ti­mes open hos­ti­lity can arise among mem­bers of the ori­gi­na­ting cul­ture. Objec­tions have been rai­sed towards this resent­ment, as some claim that it holds all mem­bers of a domi­nant cul­ture accoun­ta­ble for the actions of those in power, while deva­luing the role of the individual.

Ambrose like Definition/via cooper:

Raping a women, then after she deci­des she wants the to keep the baby that your seed plan­ted, taking that as well.

Share This
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • SphereIt
  • Mixx
  • FriendFeed

30 Comments

  • What if you (or I) don’t have anything cul­tu­rally sig­ni­fi­cant? What if there are no sym­bols that say “here is Mike?” There isn’t a tribe for someone who’s cul­tu­ral back­ground is split 16 ways.

    The clo­sest I can come is to dress anony­mously; My clothes are plain, my hair is short, I don’t wear jewelry, my tat­toos aren’t anywhere that they can be seen. The few cul­tu­ral arti­facts I have don’t have anything to do with me, they are just interesting.

    So I can unders­tand the desire for peo­ple to want to find someone to fit in with, perhaps in rejec­tion of things they don’t have a choice in being. Think of the word counter-culture: it lite­rally means a rejec­tion of your per­so­nal cul­ture. But for someone like me, there is nothing for me to rebel against.

  • First and fore­most we own the cul­ture that surrounds us whether we( you and me) came on the May­flo­wer or on a boat through Ellis Island.

    it’s not about rebe­llion; it is about taking from a race of peo­ple, aka black Ame­ri­cans and Indians who his­to­ri­cally our nation-( so I am not saying you per­so­nally or even your family as I don’t know their heri­tage but our nation the one we are citi­zens off)- deba­sed, degra­ded, tor­tu­red, and put into sla­very. A race of peo­ple that had no choice.

    A race of peo­ple who due to two hun­dred years of ins­ti­tu­tio­na­li­zed sla­very endu­red a deba­se­ment, degra­da­tion and an oppres­sion so pro­found that we can’t pos­si­ble expect fifty years of civil rights — much of it faux civil rights– to come anywhere close to get­ting close to the degree of repa­ra­tions that need to be made.

    A race of peo­ple from which we often decide to take what in the past has been only theirs and make it ours; if it suits our pur­pose, if we think it is cool, and if we want it.

    To not unders­tand that it is wrong is part of the pro­blem; unders­tan­ding that it is might go a long way in con­tri­bu­ting the solution.

  • I’m not really sure how to res­pond to this. I think I just grab­bed on an idea and went the wrong way with it. I do rea­lize it is wrong when someone tries to act like they are something that they aren’t.

  • I never unders­tood the whole cul­tu­ral appro­pria­tion thing to be anything wrong.

    I always thought of it more as an assi­mi­la­tion of cul­tu­res. a nor­mal course taken as part of a chan­ging social cons­truct as society evolved.

    I then moved to Texas.

    I have come to think that cer­tain things can be sha­red as the cul­tu­ral cons­tructs change but others as you sta­ted for the rea­sons you sta­ted and more, so many more, can not.

    I think the soo­ner that is accep­ted the better.

  • I still so pis­sed at the stem cell veto I can’t think. I had to read this twice.

    I can’t wrap my head around the con­cept of cul­tu­ral appro­pria­tion as it applies to hair so much.

    I am posi­tive you are more inc­li­ned to think that way than I am being I am a psycho­logy major with aspi­ra­tions now toward lin­guis­tics and you are an anth­ro­po­logy major with lea­nings toward taking over the UN.

    I thought I’d throw that in because I just figu­red it out.

    So the only thing I can say is that you have again given me something to think about.

    What is the res­pon­si­bi­lity toward the cul­ture of the black men and women who do white people’s dreadlocks?

    I know they have seve­ral pla­ces that do dreads where I go to school in Ohio and the peo­ple that do them are black. I have seen them doing dreads on white people.

    I guess they should not be so willing to allow the appro­pria­tion to take place in the first place and should be able to feel free to say “fuck off man you aren’t get­ting no dreads here”.

  • I actually got an edu­ca­tion in dreads recently. In what might at first seem an unu­sual place. The JazzSchool in Ber­ke­ley, Cali­for­nia. Where I took a per­for­mance stu­dies class in Bob Marley’s music. Old fat white guy does reg­gae (our band had a three-piece horn sec­tion, trum­pet, trom­bone, and sax; I got the trumpet).

    You may know this already, how dreads are spe­ci­fi­cally Jamai­can and are, in ori­gin, inse­pa­ra­ble from Ras­ta­fari cul­ture and faith — Ras Tafari being a name of Ethio­pian Empe­ror Haile Selas­sie I. Selas­sie also held the title “Lion of Judah” — thus, as I unders­tand it, to wear dreads is to iden­tify with, and in a sense be, a lion.

    One could argue that anyone not Ras­ta­fari who sports dread­locks is com­mit­ting an act of cul­tu­ral appro­pria­tion. Espe­cially when worn as a aggres­sive “mains­tream poli­ti­cal” sta­te­ment — for ins­tance, the more radi­cal groups of New Zea­land Maori who adop­ted dreads, but not Ras­ta­fari, during my stay there in the 80s. (Inci­den­tally, there were many “whi­tes” in New Zea­land who iden­ti­fied them­sel­ves as Maori and wore dreads, if their hair could be so trea­ted without it loo­king more stu­pid than leo­nine.) Bob Mar­ley the Con­ci­lia­tor (or at least so his modern dei­fiers would claim) would have likely spo­ken against such a use of dreads.

    His com­ment to a white per­son with dreads likely would not have reflec­ted a sense of being offen­ded, but, rather, the thought “That is not I”, mea­ning that it’s not an accu­rate reflec­tion of the white person’s sac­red indi­vi­dua­lity. (Ras­tas use “I” where more con­ven­tio­nal English uses “you”.)

    There’s a lot to be said for this. To wear, carry or act out something in igno­rance of your own heri­tage, or in flat­tery or emu­la­tion of another’s, is to dimi­nish your own self, your own his­tory. Wouldn’t it be far bet­ter if we could each embrace our own his­to­ries, fix the pro­blems they have, and move for­ward? Cue the Star Trek theme …

    :)

  • Hmmm… I think it is all in the inten­tion of the indi­vi­dual and I would agree with the voice of dis­sent, that not all peo­ple from the majo­rity can be held accoun­ta­ble but then yeah, live as an exam­ple that shall set you aside from the actual oppres­sive majority…

    … as for the dread­locks, I think it fine, actually and had tons of black friends who never woulld have thought my doing something like that odd. I once brai­ded my entire head, dread­locks are not for me, and a black chick did it and thought it cool and the like and it became a bridge for much con­ver­sa­tion and a con­nec­tion… me, in an all black area get­ting braids… but then again I also don’t see myself as white and neither did the African-American com­mu­nity when I lived in the US and that may have had something to do with it so…

    I do see both sides of the issue but do not think it as black and white as if you are not black don’t get dreads.

  • I see your point. It is a terri­ble thing to both covet a crea­tion and hate the crea­tor. I tend to emu­late only peo­ple I admire, which requi­res a cer­tain sense of accep­ting that per­son for who they are and not quib­bling about what might make them unworthy of admiration.

    Frankly, though, I’ve always thought it more impor­tant to get to a stage of ful­fill­ment and bliss that peo­ple would be cla­mo­ring to emu­late me.

  • What may be even sad­der is that white tee­na­gers feel so little con­nec­tion to their own cul­tu­res, as CoyoteMike’s com­ment sug­gests, that they go elsewhere to fill the void. If I were black, I believe I’d be flat­te­red. I’d also laugh at white dread peo­ple. It rhy­mes with white bread.
    In other words, this seems symp­to­ma­tic not only of domi­nant appro­pria­tion, but of the fact that the mino­rity cul­tu­res have done a bet­ter job of pas­sing down a heri­tage, des­pite oppression.

  • So I lied, I’m back on to read a few blogs during vacation.

    I enjo­yed your post — I havent seen many girls / guys wea­ring dread­locks in Europe, but I think I saw it more often in the Nether­lands than in Ger­many. Maybe it was a mini-trend about the time that you did it.
    I never sen­sed anything wrong with it, maybe because in Europe, the black-white race issues arent as pro­mi­nent. Black cul­ture is more res­pec­ted over here.

    Your defi­ni­tion of cul­tu­ral appro­pria­tion was chi­lling. I hope that has never hap­pe­ned. Though I have heard of women raped in Bos­nia who were later for­ced to bear the child in Catho­lic Croatia.

  • Per­so­nally this is a dif­fi­cult one for me. When we were in the Baha­mas a few years ago my god­daugh­ter – had she ever been bap­ti­zed had her hair done in dreads. Her mom’s of Puerto Rican des­cent – mostly Spa­nish with some Black blood; he father is from Colom­bia – mostly Spa­nish with some Indian blood

    So was she adop­ting another cul­ture or taking from one that mini­mally is part hers?

    When I was in kin­der­gar­ten, I mean grad school, we were sup­po­sed to sign a con­tract saying that the only oppres­sed peo­ple in Ame­rica at this moment – 12 years ago were Black or Native American.

    I refu­sed because it was so sim­pli­si­tic. Did they mean ins­ti­tu­tio­ni­li­zed? Did they mean have less rights legally? Etc.

    I had done all the rea­ding – and this was never defi­ned or truly dis­cus­sed on more than a pater­na­li­tis­tic level – and I did chose that word carefully

    So I asked many ques­tions. I was told that no white male could ever been con­si­de­red to be opres­sed. On the sur­face I unders­tood what they meant. But what about a white male born bor­der­line retar­ded with emo­tio­nal pro­blems who comes from a poor family in an area where he can’t get help and will be bullied? And una­ble to hold a job?

    What about the “white” Native Ame­ri­can who claims tri­bal ide­nity so that he can run a casino, though his family has been “pas­sing” for white for gene­ra­tions and has gra­dua­ted from Har­vard? Does he deserve that spe­cial treat­ment because over a hun­dred years ago his family was disc­ri­mi­na­ted against?

    I see so much disc­ri­mi­na­tion in this country against so many groups that when I refu­sed to sign the con­tract, I did begin a “war” in school. This was at the height of PCness – wish I had pic­ked a time to go back to school where things were less sim­plis­tic, and more varia­bles were added to the equation

    That said in my heart I agree with your father because I do believe in accu­la­tra­tion rather than assil­mia­tion – and unders­tand what he wan­ted to teach you

  • Exce­llent Post, Coo­per. What is Cul­tu­ral Appro­pria­tion??? What WE as humans make it to be. We are the ones who ste­reotype one cul­ture to the other. One day… One day… I dream, I hope, I wish… we will all be seen in each others eyes as ONE… not black, yellow, white, brown, etc… but ONE.

  • I have res­pon­ses to all your com­ments but as I was cove­ring a blues fes­ti­val or at least the begin­ning of one, which inc­lu­ded a pre– party from six to nine at a local bar and grill I have little con­fi­dence that this will make sense.
    So here is the short version.

    Coyote: ;)

    nochoice: it’s been awhile hey? It’s cer­tainly not a pre­fe­ren­tial assi­mi­la­tion.
    Yea for Texas.

    G: the stem cell things blows; I am more inc­li­ned as you well know. Think hard friend. As for what is the res­pon­si­bi­lity of the black men and women who do dreads on white peo­ple — well that is not for me to say.

    OC:
    jazz school? Nice. I know a little of the dread his­tory but nothing of the Ethio­pian Empe­ror.
    Cer­tainly it would be bet­ter if we could, I’m fairly cer­tain we can. ;0

    Mizzy B: “but then again I also don’t see myself as white and neither did the African-American com­mu­nity when I lived in the US and that may have had something to do with it so” well there in may lie the difference.

    mojo: I cer­tainly emu­late you can’t you tell?

    Weirsdo: I’m not fee­ling all that sad about white tee­na­gers. I guess because I am not that far from being one and I think it is all a bunch of crap. There is plenty of cul­ture there for them to grasp if they choose, if they get off their butts and look at it and stop rel­ying on tele­vi­sion for it. Sadly I see white tee­na­gers as a bunch of whiny babies most of the time.
    The mino­ri­ties may just have held on to something to keep an iden­tity which had been taken from them by the nation in which they were ens­la­ved or wiped out.

    Indie: the defi­ni­tion was a metaphor of sorts. I’m jea­lous of your vaca­tion. I’m flat­te­red you stop­ped by here.

    Pia: Let us assume she has a right to dreads. If it is part of your cul­ture there is no mini­mally about it.

    Oppres­sion as I see it is as I desc­ri­bed above in my expla­na­tion to coyote.

    One sin­gle white male born with men­tal disa­bi­li­ties to a poor white family who hap­pens to live in an area where there is no help is disad­van­ta­ged, maybe to a sig­ni­fi­cant degree, he is not oppres­sed in the man­ner of which I speak.

    Taking all things into account, depen­ding on the state he lives in , the laws of that state in regard to peo­ple with disa­bi­li­ties, and the types of pro­gram avai­la­ble he could be oppressed.

    Oppres­sion is not a word I would usually apply to all disad­van­ta­ged indi­vi­duals. Now if a law in his state pre­ven­ted him, (due to his disa­bi­lity), from doing things he wan­ted to and could do.… that would be a form of oppression.

    One is not always oppres­sed due to a disad­van­tage but one that is sig­ni­fi­cantly oppres­sed is always disadvantaged.

    The degree of the oppres­sion can make the disad­van­tage hard to over­come and if a mathe­ma­ti­cal for­mula was applied to the oppres­sion of say.…. Afri­can
    Ame­ri­cans … due to ins­ti­tu­tio­na­li­zed sla­very both the degree of the disad­van­tage and — mathe­ma­ti­cally — the time it would take to make up for the disad­van­tage that has occu­rred due to said oppres­sion — would be sig­ni­fi­cantly more than the two hun­dred years of slavery.

    As for the Indian ques­tion I say my ans­wer is yes but please don’t make me explain it now. My com­ment guard is watching.

    Shayna: Hey girl. We will not all be one , that is not meant to be but we cer­tainly should be to a point where we cele­brate who we are and let ever­yone else cele­brate who they are — appre­cia­ting the dif­fe­ren­ces and let­ting it all roll.

  • You do not emu­late me, Miss Coo­per. You’ve always had your own style and your own sense of what’s impor­tant. That’s why I keep rea­ding you, because you say something that I’ve never heard before.

  • Well done.

    I nee­ded a hea­dache, but yet well done.

    Off to pon­der it all I go.

  • Blushing off the flat­tery and moving for­ward, I have a dif­fe­rent pers­pec­tive on cul­tu­ral appro­pria­tion. There was an article I read in college called “A world in Pid­gin.” The more cul­tu­res meet, the more they exchange ideas and values which inc­lude style and fashion. Well, except for me. We live in a creole world where cul­tu­ral power has dif­fe­rent chan­nels from mili­tary and eco­no­mic power. I have to think that’s a good thing.

  • […] do spend too much time thin­king about. She fra­mes it around a great story. I’m proud. | Per­ma­link No Comments» […]

  • I can­not help but throw just a tiny bit more gaso­line on the fire. If you will indulge me, the follo­wing quote is from the Wiki­pe­dia online page devo­ted to the dreadlock:

    “Dread­locks are a uni­ver­sal phe­no­me­non and through the ages, peo­ple of various cul­tu­res have worn dread­locks. It can be said that what are known today as “dread­locks” are one of the oldest and most uni­ver­sal hairsty­les known”

    It goes on to say how dreads have appea­red in ancient Egypt, in Cel­tic dra­wings, in India, and basi­cally everywhere else. It is actually the most human of hairsty­les, as all hair that is left alone, without brushing, com­bing, cut­ting, trying to con­trol will even­tually form them­sel­ves into dreadlocks.

  • The words “or” and “it” should be on either side of the phrase “trying to con­trol”. Stu­pid brain fell asleep.

  • I should learn never to post anything I can’t arti­cu­late well on the internet.

    MoJo: BOO

    Joe: Pon­der on sorry for the headache.

    Dawg: think there are quite a few dif­fe­rent pers­pec­ti­ves on this issue. In regard to oppres­sed popu­la­tions my views are pretty much firm.

    Lan­guage — being a form of know­ledge only in that it chan­ges the brain — does have the power to change peo­ple over time as it can change know­ledge but only in so much as the thoughts — which are always con­cep­tual– can be chan­ged by their framing.

    Pig­din although dif­fe­rent from the lan­gua­ges it was deri­ved from has words that mean the same as the words from the lan­gua­ges it was deri­ved from, so it is the thought that needs to be chan­ged or refra­med. I believe.
    Or maybe I don’t wtf do I know any­way I only took the man­da­tory lin­guis­tics as it anno­yed the shit out of me.

    Yes une­qual cul­tu­ral power… which we do not make any­more equal, and may make less so, by taking what was never ours from a peo­ple that our nation oppres­sed and making it ours because we want to, taking it out of con­text and rob­bing the power and mea­ning of it from the peo­ple it belongs to.

    To enjoy the dif­fe­ren­ces while let­ting them be dif­fe­rent and rea­li­zing they are and everything being all equal and fair and having no oppres­sed popu­la­tions anywhere would be the ideal.

    Cul­tu­ral appro­pria­tion is morally ques­tio­na­ble on the grounds that it pre­tends to make a sta­te­ment and further­more claims ownership of something that is not right­fully ours and it hap­pens often to oppres­sed peo­ple and in the con­text of dread that is what happens.

    Some would say that cul­tu­ral rela­ti­vism prec­lu­des a cer­tain degree of assi­mi­la­tion and at this time it is false assi­mi­la­tions based in cul­tu­ral appropriation.

    Coyote: I ban the use of wiki quo­tes from my blog for ever…………damn you coyote………

    I am not pos­ting anything more that requi­res me to post ans­wers or look like a fool for the rest of the year month week
    We have to look at which popu­la­tions have feel that dread­locks are his­to­ri­cally and CULTURALLY sig­ni­fi­cant in this case.

    If you tell me that they are cul­tu­rally sig­ni­fi­cant to you then I would say liar, liar pants on fire but as you don’t often wear pants I guess that would not work.

    When pie­ces of a cul­ture (dreads) are taken out of con­text, rob­bing them of power and mea­ning, (to the peo­ple to which they are his­to­ri­cally and cul­tu­rally sig­ni­fi­cant) I call cul­tu­ral appro­pria­tion. At least as I see it now after rea­ding a ton of shit on it over the last few weeks and then thin­king about it.

    I will not deny that there is quite a pos­si­bi­lity that my thought pro­cess is faulty but that is where it stands at this moment.
    And I am not going to proof this.

    My brain is also asleep.

    I’m gonna have fun here tomo­rrow but for now a long day of The Blues and I am going to sleep.

  • Wow, I’m the cause of a new rule, and I got dam­ned. That’s alot to take from just tal­king out of my ass.

  • Something to think about as I go out to play a round of golf.

    I read this yes­ter­day but it was beyond me to comment.

    My degrees are in business.

    I never spend much time as an under­grad or in grad school giving any thought to things that did not apply to my majors and my ulti­mate goal.

    I applaud that you think about many things and give us all stuff to think about.

    I can wrap my mind around it but I can’t arti­cu­late exactly what my fee­lings are about it without thin­king about it a little more. A lot more to be more exact.

    Just wan­ted to let you know I read it.

  • I agree about white tee­na­gers. What I meant was, it’s sad that so many are just whiny babies flai­ling around grab­bing stuff because they never grew up. It’s sad even if a lot of the situa­tion is their own fault.

  • The degree of the oppres­sion can make the disad­van­tage hard to over­come and if a mathe­ma­ti­cal for­mula was applied to the oppres­sion of say….. Afri­can
    Ame­ri­cans … due to ins­ti­tu­tio­na­li­zed sla­very both the degree of the disad­van­tage and — mathe­ma­ti­cally — the time it would take to make up for the disad­van­tage that has occu­rred due to said oppres­sion — would be sig­ni­fi­cantly more than the two hun­dred years of slavery.

    An an engi­nee­ring stu­dent I love this part.

  • Hey all this is one big res­ponse because I am a cou­ple days late and a dollar or two short.

    Group Hug.

    Yeah it sucks in light of the post but I get a little weak when the com­men­tary gets long.

    I appre­ciate all the dia­lo­gue, it shows you are not assholes.

    :)

    Love ya

    coo­per

  • […] And to wrap all of this up, Coo­per, a White woman, wri­tes a great post on her expe­rience having had dread­locks and how she came to rea­lize that it was problematic. […]

  • I guess you com­ple­tely left the old dj site?

    This is a pretty awe­some post coop and being His­pa­nic and Fili­pino I appre­ciate all efforts.

    I remem­ber peo­ple saying that I used the Filipno Card to get into college and I remem­ber you saying
    ” it’d be pretty stu­pid not to use wha­te­ver card you have, we all use our cards and if your card hap­pens to be the “fili­pino card” you bet­ter play it”.

    Or something like that.

    If I join this world of blogs I’ll let you know. I hope to retain my name. ( filipinocard)

    sig­ned

    the fili­pi­no­card

  • […] This is a white woman who felt it neces­sary to cut her locs. […]

  • Came across this by acci­dent. Exce­llent. I live in Gra­nada Spain where half the under 30 white popu­la­tion have locs but spea­king with peo­ple I find no cons­cious­ness or unders­tan­ding of what they are doing. It began to irri­tate me soon after i arri­ved here. Its such an insult and i feel like i am per­so­nally being sto­len or as you say appro­pria­ted. I feel like publishing Colin Ken­nedy Dono­van and Qwo-Li Dris­kill post in Spa­nish and stic­king up pos­ters everywhere.

  • IMHO, the cul­tu­ral appro­pria­tion issue can get way, way out of hand.

    I’ve been at the front­line of this issue at times simply as a white woman whose natu­rally curly hair most easily is main­tai­ned in “black” hairstyles.

    One needs to dis­tin­guish bet­ween the wea­ring of a style which is com­mon in many cul­tu­res and does not neces­sa­rily have a mea­ning (for exam­ple, a hat — such as a fedora) and wea­ring a style that has religious/ritual/cultural mea­ning when igno­rant of that mea­ning (such as a yarmulke).

    I think one can wear dread­locks without being Ras­ta­fa­rian because dread­locks are com­mon in many cul­tu­res. Look:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dreadlocks

    Wea­ring dread­locks “to look like a Ras­ta­fa­rian, because it’s cool” is a totally dif­fe­rent matter.

    The whole ques­tion is one of intent, and it’s hard to gauge intent just by loo­king at someone.