The Embryo Speaks (Die Leibesfrucht spricht)

Thank you to Indie for allo­wing me to use this.

This will make you think and is worth more than a pas­sing look. Food for thought on a Tues­day evening.

Writ­ten in 1927 by Ger­man Sati­rist Kurt Tucholsky pos­ted ori­gi­nally at Kurt Tucholsky , a blog which con­tains a selec­tion of works by sati­rist Kurt Tucholsky (1890 – 1935), a blog well worth a link in your side­bar , trans­la­ted into English from the Ger­man by Inde­ter­mi­nacy .

They all take care of me: Church, State, Doc­tors and Jud­ges. I should grow and thrive; I should slum­ber nine months long; I should not worry about a thing – they all wish me well. They pro­tect me. They watch over me. God have mercy if my parents do something to me; then they will all be there. Whoe­ver touches me will be punished; my mother lands in pri­son, my father right behind; the doc­tor who did it must cease to be a doc­tor, the mid­wife who hel­ped is loc­ked up — I’m a pre­cious item. They all take care of me: Church, State, Doc­tors and Jud­ges. Nine months long. But when the nine months are over, I have to see for myself what beco­mes of me. Tuber­cu­lo­sis? No doc­tor will help me. Nothing to eat? No Milk? – no State will help me. Tor­ment and misery? The Church will com­fort me, but that doesn’t fill my sto­mach. And if I have no bread to break or to bite and I steal: the Judge is right there to lock me up. Fifty years of my life no one will care about me, no one. I have to help myself. Nine months long they kill them­sel­ves, if someone wants to kill me. You tell me: isn’t that a strange way to look after the wel­fare of another?

The more things change.…the more they don’t.

trans­la­tion copy­right 2006

There is obviously no need for me to add anything so only a few brief nota­tions. There are many links which can be added to this to make this point as well as some his­tory which is worth noting ; howe­ver, this in and of itself deser­ved some diges­ting on it’s own so I won’t go to much further. You can check out a fairly inc­lu­sive bit of infor­ma­tion here, in regard to the how, why and when ‚so you can relate it to the reli­gious and poli­ti­cal cli­mate of the times. Wiki of course has their own bit with the help of a time­line. A note from more recent his­tory is added as well in Glo­ria Steinem’s Views on ” The Nazi Con­nec­tion”. In a quote from, If Hit­ler Were Alive, Whose Side Would He Be On?, in an abrid­ged article from Speak Out Against the New Right edi­ted by Her­bert F. Vet­ter (Bos­ton: Bea­con Press, 1982)

A return to a strong family life, women’s pri­mary iden­tity as mothers, tax penal­ties for remai­ning sin­gle, loans for young married cou­ples and sub­si­dies for child­bea­ring, prohi­bi­tion of pros­ti­tu­tion and homo­se­xua­lity, con­tra­cep­tion, and abor­tion: all these were issues that the Roman Catho­lic Church, the Catho­lic Cen­ter Party, and the Nazi Party could agree on. And once Hit­ler came to power, popu­larly elec­ted in part by the patriarchal bac­klash against femi­nist suc­ces­ses, he deli­ve­red on his pro­mise to res­tore male supre­macy. In 1933, femi­nists were remo­ved from teaching and other public posts by the same law that remo­ved “non-Aryans” from such jobs. All women were ban­ned from the Reichs­tag, from jud­geships, and from other decision-making posts. Under Hit­ler, choo­sing abor­tion became sabo­tage; a crime punisha­ble by hard labor for the woman and a pos­si­ble death penalty for the abor­tio­nist. ” If the man’s world is said to be the State … her world is her hus­band, her family, her chil­dren and her home … Every child that a woman brings into the world is a battle, a battle waged for the exis­tence of her peo­ple.… It is not true … that res­pect depends on the over­lap­ping of the sphe­res of acti­vity of the sexes; this res­pect demands that neither sex should try to do that which belongs to the sphere of the other.” — Hitler’s speech to the Natio­nal Socia­list Women’s Orga­ni­za­tion, Sep­tem­ber, 1934.”

It also seems if you look at the polit­cal situa­tion , social cli­mate of a nation at any given time, the more poverty and the less edu­ca­tion avai­la­ble to the mas­ses the more likley abor­tion would be loo­ked on as a crime. All of this while at the same time cate­ring to an upper class and igno­ring the fact that indeed there were chil­dren that were not cared for, fed or educated.


 

Share This
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • SphereIt
  • Mixx
  • FriendFeed

21 Comments

  • Really inte­res­ting find coo­per — and of course the ques­tions of para­llel bet­ween the early Nazi poli­cies and the current aspi­ra­tions of the Ame­ri­can Right are worthy of thought. Check out firedoglake’s recent series on right wing online hate speech for more analy­sis of this sort (scroll to the bot­tom for the full list of posts on the topic).

    The point rai­sed vis a vis post-natal care and the sud­den worth­less­ness of human life is always pro­ble­ma­tic for the right to address. Quite simply, for all the care some would alle­gedly have for a fetus during preg­nancy, where is the com­pa­ra­ble care for the qua­lity, sanc­tity, and safety of human life after that? How is an infant any more able to pro­tect itself than a fetus?

    Cross com­men­ted at BIO ;-)

  • I com­men­ted at BIO as it seems a good forum for it. I found it
    fas­ci­na­ting and thank you for poin­ting it out. As I said the the
    com­pa­ri­sons are inters­ting and frigh­te­ning at the same time. The ore we change the more we remain the same — you are right there. The ques­tion is when does the circle
    end.

  • Nice piece and make me want to inves­ti­gate this in more detail
    at some point in time.

    http://www.oldamericancentury.org/14pts.htm

    I will link up your Dar­fur blog but don’t bother with the DJ.

  • Just goes to show you that the human con­di­tion is truly that. The
    human condition.

  • You’ve pos­ted a lot in the last two days I can’t keep up.

    Too Old.

    If the human con­di­tion and the social cli­mate that surrounds it does not change, or if it chan­ges but only ends up at the same place is it worth all the trou­ble in the end?

    We are right back where others have been before. I’m not sure that we are exactly in Nazi Ger­many that seems a bit n the harsh side although the simi­la­ri­ties are — – not plea­sant to take note of.

  • Alice! Thanks for doing all this exce­llent research and put­ting the text into his­to­ri­cal (and modern) pers­pec­tive. I found this highly infor­ma­tive. I read an older set of authors / books and am often asto­nished at how little times have chan­ged. Very few of our issues are new. And one can get quite pes­si­mis­tic about how so much has sta­yed the same.

  • Abso­lu­tely correct of course.

    I just worry about the rami­fi­ca­tions of invo­king Hit­ler. You seem to have done all­right thus far, anyways.

    The Roman Catho­lic Church is full of bullshit. No two ways about it.

  • I don’t even unders­tand where the idea of women being “infe­rior” came from. My mother is one of the stron­gest women I know, but its only since my dad has reti­red that she has been able to give up “tra­di­tio­nal woman’s roles.” I have known far more (in num­ber) inte­lli­gent women than I have inte­lli­gent men, but that may be because I disa­gree with aggres­sive ideas.

    But then again, there are many things I don’t unders­tand about life.

  • I had the same reac­tion to Indie’s trans­la­tion of that piece. It could have been writ­ten yes­ter­day, but for the poetry.

  • Philo: I chec­ked them out good stuff. There is no balance.

    jacob: It needs to end but when?
    I guess never, circ­les never end.

    john: thanks and it is an inte­res­ting thing to inves­ti­gate but frus­tra­ting to see how little pro­gress is made.

    Weirsdo: yup again. I read your com­ment at the blog you men­tio­ned Stei­nem and I remem­be­red that piece by her from a class a cou­ple years a go and went to look it up to use.

    Indie: so much for pro­gress. We have come so far tech­no­lo­gi­cally though. ;)

    Dan: Indeed.

    Joe: we should be appa­lled at any similarity.

    indie: but we’ve come so far tech­no­lo­gi­cally? ;)

    Wom­bat: If I need a body guard I will call you. I don’t care for invo­king Hit­ler too many times a year but if the shoe fits it is only fair. Don’t even get me star­ted on that Catho­lic Church.

    Coyote: I ima­gine there are a lot of things most of us don’t know about life and sadly most peo­ple don’t care.

    Doug: Yes it is a per­fect frame which seems to fit all era’s.

  • I agree with your body guard Womabt. The mind candy that he is. ;)
    The Cathoic Church…egads. A mess.
    You always are good at making me think girl. Thanks.

  • I find the human con­di­tion to be ever chan­ging and ever the same. There are some who argue Nazism’s has a dis­tinct affi­nity with the Democ­ra­tic Party. Arguing the com­mon ground bet­ween Nazism and Democ­rats spans euge­nics (Democ­rats: abor­tion and eutha­na­sia), class/race war­fare (Dems: reverse racism, “soak the rich”), state con­trol of busi­ness (Dems: if it moves, regu­late it; if it doesn’t move, tax it), the sup­pres­sion of oppo­sing views ( Dems: cam­pus speech codes, dis­rup­tion of con­ser­va­tive spea­kers, efforts to muzzle the blo­gosphere).. I find these peo­ple uni­for­med or delu­sio­nal. I did a lac­rosse post. You are bound to live it. Carry on oh… “Broom to the Gar­bage of Society”.

  • Cow­girl Wel­come. My Body Guard. Yes. Mind Candy?

    Dane: Broom to the gar­bage of society — not quite .

  • Coop — Shayna’s will ans­wer the mind candy part ;)

  • Alice I think of you as our cons­cience, and I thank you for that

  • Aww, I wan­ted to guard your body. Mostly against Wom­bat :P

  • Cow­girl: I saw it and finally understood…voila…lol

    pia: don’t know if I want to be a cons­cience any­more than I want to be a “broom to the gar­bage of society ” but beg­gars can’t be .….la di da.

    Coyote: Wom­bat is harm­less , plua I know all his sec­rets and could black­mail him so no worries there. Body guards…I think they would be anno­ying after a time.

  • this is why i’d rather stick to faith than reli­gion. mis­sed your thought-provoking posts. rea­ding you is like coming home.

  • yup…I find this Tucholsky­text espe­cially asto­nishing when one sees what is going on ion South Dakota lately. Or not at all asto­nishing. I think Tucholsky gives the per­fect sum­mary of all the hypoc­risy around this topic. sad.…

  • tran: I’ve mis­sed you so.

    anto­nia: indeed esp­cially asto­nishing but then again not in light of.….….…..